No. 338: UpWest and Hygge

Hygge-2PM

A publicly-traded retailer launched a DTC brand. This is a deep dive into their reasoning, the build, and their internal expectations. 

Middle-class retail is at an impasse. Since the beginning of 2019, there have been 19 bankruptcies to include Forever 21, Gymboree, Charlotte Russe, Payless ShoeSource, Diesel, and Destination Maternity. And there are another eight retailers at risk to include: J.C. Penney, Neiman Marcus, J. Crew, and Hudson’s Bay. In Gilded Age 2.0, I explain that our current retail era signals a casualty of the middle class consumer; a class that once emerged in response to the industrial and financial booms of the late 19th century and the governmental reforms of the mid-20th century.

With a flailing gig economy, stagnant wages, and rising personal debts, 2019 presents a break from the mid-century momentum that defined the 20th century. We are beginning to hear faint echoes of an earlier time of boom or bust and feast or famine. Rather than appealing to pure luxury consumers or fast fashion-loving millennials, the “long middle: erroneously remains the bullseye of the target. Retailers have been slow to optimize for a new market of coveted consumers.

In a recent report by Business of Fashion proclaimed that America still doesn’t have an answer to LVMH. They explain:

Spoilt for choice, consumers are less interested in mid-priced products available at scale: they want dangerously affordable fast fashion or pure luxury. (And preferably at a discount.) It’s harder for consumers to see the value in something that is not cheap but not that expensive, either. Especially if it’s not utterly unique. That’s a problem for Tapestry in particular, which deals exclusively in accessible luxury. [1]

Against the backdrop of abundant choice and a bifurcating market, Ohio retailer Express launched a new brand. Express is currently trading at a $265 million market cap with north of $2b in sales. The cost of that revenue is extraordinarily high compared to healthier retailers. Trailing twelve months, Ralph Lauren Corporation earned north of $6.5 billion with a $2.45 billion cost of revenue.

In contrast, Express earned (TTM) north of $2.1 billion with a $1.5 billion cost of revenue. A 25% gross profit margin heading into a crucial holiday season, the Columbus-based retailer hopes to use the DTC initiative to improve their long-term outlook. The effort has been met with a mix of pessimism and optimism. 

Pierre Kim of Away

For years, retailers have been criticized for not evolving quickly enough to meet the demands of their customers, so what do they have to lose with this new strategy? Their core labels may be faltering, but they still have brand equity. Why not use it to experiment and launch new businesses?  [2]

Paul Munford of Lean Luxe

There’s baggage associated with being under a legacy retailer’s umbrella—it decreases the value of the brand to the savvy consumer,” he said. “However, execution will always ultimately be the key here. Spinoffs need to feel like their own entity, as opposed to a sub-brand of the legacy retailer. [2]

There are merits to both arguments. And a little bit of digging provided more clarity for this report. Under the umbrella of Les Wexner’s Limited Brands, Express launched as women’s clothier “Limited Express” in 1980 Chicago. Led by CEO Michael Weiss, the brand expanded to eight stores in 1981 and by 1986, Express began a test for menswear in 16 of its 250 stores. The men’s line spun out as Structure in 1989.

I remember the brand very clearly. As a twelve year old in 1995, the halls of my middle school were split between the haves and the have nots. For the ones with, shirts by Polo and Structure were the daily wears and all I could remember is the sensation of having neither.

4
Remember this?

The advancements that Express made during that 20 year run are astounding to think about. In 2001, Express became a dual gender brand – a pivot that Madewell is currently attempting to execute. Structure “sold” to Express, or at least that’s how I remembered it. Because immediately, I became a fan of Express. In actuality, the brand was owned by the same holding company. It funneled its mens business to a brand that provided more opportunity. L Brands then, quietly, sold the mark to Sears in 2003. The Structure brand was never heard from again.

Express is no longer owned by L Brands, one of the most prolific builders of retail brands in history. It was sold to Golden Gate Capital Partners, a private equity firm with $15b in assets under management. And then, in May of 2010, the retailer went public.

Demographic vs. Psychographic | Part Two 

In 2016, Express made its first play for the direct-to-consumer era by acquiring a minority stake in HOMAGE, the Columbus Ohio retailer led by founder Ryan Vesler. It’s a genuine brand, one where the founder-product fit is as valuable as its product-market fit. The minority investment with vintage t-shirt company meant that Express bought a new audience of a key demographic: the college-aged millennial.

Homage President Jason Block said in an email that Express will consult with the company on an ongoing basis and the investment will allow Homage to expand both its digital and brick-and-mortar presence. [3]

Aside from investing in a growing company,  Express gained the rights to include a limited selection of HOMAGE products in store. The investment was intended to bolster foot traffic while, potentially, benefitting from the long-term flip – if and when the HOMAGE brand grew with the help of Express. It’s unclear whether or not this initiative was successful for either of the brands. The company is currently trading below the price it maintained during the period that Express began its partnership with HOMAGE. The publicly-traded retailer’s missteps over the past two years were due, in part, to a number of macroeconomic shifts.  The launch of UpWest represents a strategy shift of its own.

In Psychographics in Focus, I explain the difference between a demographic and psychographic. Consumer psychology involves the interest in lifestyle, behavior, and habit. It’s an encompassing measure that considers our idiosyncrasies, our temperament, and even our subtle personality traits. These are the variables that influence our behavior as consumers. Psychographic segmentation is the analysis of a consumer cohort’s lifestyle with the intent to create a detailed profile. [4]

Taking a community-building approach, UpWest plans to connect with new customers through experiential events, including a regional tour across the US that features the UpWest Cabin, a mobile pop-up exhibit featuring relaxation-focused experiences like yoga and meditation classes. Slated stops include Columbus, Chicago, Nashville, Denver and Austin.  [2]

From the typeface, to the story-telling, to the merchandising – the UpWest brand is designed to attract fans of the digitally-native industry. Rather than a specific demographic, Express pursued an interest (DTC) and is building a brand atop of that engaged audience.

DTC As A Psychographic

Веб Смит в Twitter

DTC, 2012: a tech stack strategy. DTC, 2016: a logistics strategy. DTC, 2020: a brand strategy.

In a span of three days, I received multiple emails and texts from contacts close to the launch of UpWest. Kaleigh Moore, Forbes writer and 2PM collaborator had a story in queue by then. In the Lean Luxe Slack, it was a topic of conversation. Rather than building in-house with Express’ existing engineering group, UpWest contracted Shopify agency BVAccel to handle the design and development work. This was a nod to several of the most successful digitally native brands in the space to include Untuckit, Cubcoats, Chubbies, and Rebecca Minkoff. 

Comparison-Upwest

The site’s architecture communicates a desire to be mentioned in the DTC conversation, this includes UpWest’s partnership with Klaviyo and its new-age loyalty program. It would appear that UpWest chose to focus on the DTC psychographic for the sake of earned media and brand positioning. As far as the nuts and bolts are concerned, the site’s build communicates that the desired target demographic is millennial-aged women. On day zero, the brand has an explicit purpose: to provide comfort for body, mind, & spirit. The clothes, are priced similar in design and price to Marine Layer – its next closest competitor.

Identifying Waves: Importing Hygge to America

In the past year, this concept of Scandinavian coziness has made inroads with an international audience. [5]

Imagine a whiteboard in one of Express’ suburban Columbus boardrooms; the word “hygge” would have been at the center of it in big and bold lettering. You can picture the brand’s chief comfort officer (and Express’ SVP of Strategic Initiatives) standing in the corner of the room, jamming as Cody’s It’s Christmas plays on the room’s four Sonos speakers. The brand wants you to feel a feeling. Analysts agree. Emily Singer, founder of the DTC newsletter “Chips and Dip” had this to say:

There’s something very boring about it. Maybe that’s intentional. This line feels a little too on the nose: ‘Welcome to curated comfort. For those who are seeking peace and calm in a stressful world.’ Brands tap into emotional states, but it’s rarely laid out so explicitly.

It’s this perceived boredom that is viewed as an understated luxury in American culture. To the Danes, hygge is free of economic status. The culture’s entire focus is on practicality, movement, wellness, and mindfulness. It’s this underlying culture that Express hopes to import with the help of some obvious visual cues from well-known DTC retailers.

The UpWest typeface is nearly identical to the typeface of Outdoor Voices and Marine Layer’s. Ironically, both retailers have references to Scandinavian hygge throughout their brand messaging. But for UpWest, there’s no understatement. Every message is turned to maximum volume. Like the primary header of Express.com: UpWest’s primary menu is a throwback to “Limited Express”, a retailer for women-first and men-second. There are elements of luxury abound. Upwest’s blog features new-age terms like: nourish, mindfulness, tranquility, and sanctuary. The traveling pop-up is a “cabin.” These are all symbols of wealthier millennials with time and resources to spare. As is the concept of philanthropy and sustainability (though UpWest sells products that are made with synthetics).

It starts with our cozy apparel, home and wellness products. We want to surround you with calm and give you balance. But it’s not just the tangible things. It’s also about slowing down. Diving deeper. And giving back.

Not to be outdone, UpWest wants consumers to help them donate $1 million to the Mental Health Association. The Express-borne retailer plays the entire DTC hand of cards. This report began with a simple statement: middle-class retail is at an impasse. To the average consumer, this DTC play is akin to Structure being launched as Express Men. Like a sheep, the seventeen year old me bought from Express as soon as my adolescent wallet would allow. The mechanics are similar here. Express is attracting an existing audience (the DTC psychographic) and using it to invigorate a brand that is plateauing.

Заключение

The UpWest bet is that the retailer can earn the business of the upwardly mobile DTC audience by engineering a product-market fit. One with heavy branding, ideal-alignment, and market messaging. This is one of the first upmarket attempts that we’ve seen from a specialty retailer. It’s one that deserves praise. Their management team engineered a brand with contemporary pricing and luxury messaging – void of pricing promotions (for now). They’ve acknowledged that the data shows a middle-class at an impasse. They have the supply chain, the logistics, the distribution, and a snapshot of a brand. But do the executives at Express truly understand what makes the top DTC brands work? That remains the question that could move the market.

Time will tell if Express can duplicate the brand architecting of their L Brands era – a time defined by face-less brands, clever signage, billboards, and foot traffic. My guess is that Express will find an audience that is more sophisticated and critical than the young adults of the 80’s, 90’s, and 2000’s. Messaging, distribution, and customer acquisition methods will evolve with this realization. And if that’s the case, their hygge may be tested for quite some time.

Research and Report by Web Smith | About 2PM 

No. 337: Stick To Sports

For as long as there has been athletic competition, there has been a narrative that permeates from the field of play. Gladiators of Rome were commonly first-generation slaves, bought and sold at the whim of their owners – the sporting promoters of their day. Like today’s gladiator sports, cruelty was a part of the spectacle. And the minds of the time contrasted in their approval or disapproval of their era’s proudest spectacle. Great minds like Seneca disapproved of the competition. Marcus Aurelius once abolished a tax on gladiator-based taxes and commerce; he wanted nothing to do with the capitalism of it all. And still, he couldn’t resist hosting lavish games from time to time. The spectacle of cruelty was insatiable to the average man and the great one – alike.

As it was, as it will always be. Sports was never without its social commentary. Jesse Owens’ olympic showing wasn’t just impressive because of the speed of his feet; he beat the myth of German superiority with a foot race. Jackie Robinson wasn’t just a baseball player, he was remembered as a hero. That was the narrative that was formed about the man, even while his involvement lacked the popular sentiment that it is awarded today. Janet Guthrie was a media fixture, not just because of her precedent off of the track but because of her accomplishments on it. Before Danica Patrick, there was her. And with a little more support from sponsors and officials, she could have accomplished much more.

Since when has sports been about athletic accomplishment alone?

On a November evening after the Baltimore Ravens’ decisive victory against the undefeated New England Patriots, ESPN National NFL Writer Kevin Seifert made a statement with a simple tweet. He listed three quarterbacks, each of whom are considered candidates to win the league’s coveted most valuable player award. The quarterbacks that Seifert listed: Russell Wilson, Deshaun Watson, and Lamar Jackson are what veteran industry analysts would call: unconventional, mobile, dual-threat. However, they’re more than that. In each case, whether these quarterbacks pass or rush, they lead from the front. More than anything else, that’s their common thread.

Kevin Seifert on Twitter

If we’re doing the MVP now, I’m going: 1. Russell Wilson 2. Deshaun Watson 3. Lamar Jackson

Here is a selection of quarterbacks drafted before 2019’s MVP candidates: Ryan Tannehill, Brandon Weeden, Brock Osweiler, Mitchell Trubisky, Baker Mayfield, Sam Darnold, Josh Allen, and Josh Rosen. To the casual observer, this thought may as well be morse code. So consider the following: the National Football League has never had three African-American quarterbacks in the front running for most valuable player. And certainly not in an era of the sport’s greatest quarterbacks, namely Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers. We’re still in a period of firsts in this 150 year old sport. Brigham Young University started their first African-American quarterback in the year 2019. The sentiments of the 1950’s still linger. So what Seifert was doing was making a statement without controversy. To the untrained eye, it was merely the fact of the matter. But to those who understand the historical significance, it was a dog whistle of sorts.

“If you ask me is there a false narrative out there, I will tell you ESPN being a political organization is false,” he said. “I will tell you I have been very, very clear with employees here that it is not our jobs to cover politics, purely.” [1]

But even with the mandate by new ESPN President Jimmy Pitaro, Seifert found a way to toe the proverbial line. Wilson, the 75th pick of the 2012 draft is now the highest paid quarterback in the league. Bears quarterback Mitchell Trubisky was drafted before Watson. And Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson was publicly and privately coaxed to convert to wide receiver by many in the media. He didn’t fit the image. His chorus of detractors included former Indianapolis Colts GM Bill Polian [2].

After this historic game, Bleacher Report took a muted approach as to avoid the conversation altogether. In the NFL, running backs don’t win MVP over transcendent quarterbacks. In the last 20 years, just four have won. Sixteen quarterbacks have been selected in that time. Just the same, here was their take:

And [Jackson] a clear MVP candidate. This game firmly planted him in that discussion, along with Panthers running back Christian McCaffrey, Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson and Texans quarterback Deshaun Watson.[3]

Meanwhile, at Deadspin, the two lead stories are written by a generic “Deadspin.” A sign that no one is behind the wheel. The reports were merely a collection of embedded tweets. There’s one on the Ravens surprise victory. The one where the quarterback (that should have played receiver) trounced the greatest of all time. As the two shook hands upon leaving the field of play – battered and bruised – Jackson uttered “You’re the GOAT.” As if Brady needed a reminder. The other Deadspin “story” featured the Cleveland Browns latest off-the-field issue.

The only report with any personality was written by Karu F. Daniels of The Root, another property of G/O Media. It was repurposed into Deadspin content. One can only wonder what Deadspin would have written about a unique moment in the sport’s vaunted history. But the site is currently a shell of its former self. The staff quit en masse after being told to by G/O Media management to “stick to sports.” A common refrain in today’s corporate media.

G/O Media is the product of Great Hill Partners’ acquisition of the former Gizmodo Media Group. The all-equity transaction was facilitated with Jim Spanfeller, best known for his leadership at Forbes.com. Perhaps, it’s his lack of experience in sports media that permitted such a fatal miscalculation.

The Irony of The “Stick to Sports” Mandate

Google Search interest for “Stick to Sports” peaks in September 2017

On its merits, the nature of the phrase is divisive. When ESPN’s Rachel Nichols spoke out in September of 2017, the peak of its interest, she raised questions around the hypocrisy of it. It was around that time when J.J. Watt was rightly praised for raising $20 million for hurricane relief while other athletes faced pushback for highlighting other extracurricular causes – most often around social justice issues. With the current state of American politics at a relative boiling point, the separation of societal politics and corporate entertainment have never been more difficult to parse. ESPN found ways around its “stick to sports” mandate by elevating intelligent and nuanced figures like Pablo Torre, Stephen A. Smith, Max Kellerman,and Bomani Jones. Deadspin wasn’t as forward thinking and they ultimately paid for that.

“Stick to sports” is, of course, a fault line in 2019’s culture wars. [4]

But as the state of our political machine continues to polarize Americans, the mandate becomes harder and harder to follow. Yet, it becomes more important to disobey. In fact, at some point, the mandate becomes bad business. This is especially true for digital media where Deadspin rival and The Chernin Group-owned Barstool Sports has thrived by using sports as a platform to enter adjacent conversations. And I am using the word “adjacent” liberally here. Several of the top stories on Barstool Sports currently include an Instagram influencer questioning his history syllabus, a feature on the “Watchmen” series, and a woman that tattooed her eyeballs.

The banner of Barstool’s homepage features a link to the media group’s famed Chicks podcast. And all of this is to say, it seems to be working for Barstool. This includes its cozy relationship with Fox News, including regular appearances by founder Dave Portnoy on Tucker Carlson. And this isn’t an argument against their approach. Rather, it was an acknowledgment that Barstool Sports has thus far succeeded by understanding the property’s psychographic. The Chernin Group seems to have avoided the stick to sports conversation with CEO Erika Nardini.

Ringer, Deadspin, B/R, Barstool and Psychographics

Consumer psychology involves the interest in lifestyle, behavior, and habit. It’s an encompassing measure that considers our idiosyncrasies, our temperament, and even our subtle personality traits. These are the variables that influence our behavior as consumers. Psychographic segmentation is the analysis of a consumer cohort’s lifestyle with the intent to create a detailed profile.

The Ringer is jovial and care-free. Bleacher Report is dead-pan with the occasionally dry humor. Barstool is edgy and offensive as a strategy. And so was Deadspin.

While largely focused on sports, Deadspin for years had delved into a broad range of topics in a voice that was sometimes rude, often funny and always conversational. On Tuesday, the site’s top editor, Barry Petchesky, was fired after refusing to go along with the order. The departures shocked fans of the site, which put a new spin on sports coverage for a generation of digital natives. But they were the result of a long buildup of resentment between the journalists and their new bosses, according to interviews with 13 current and former employees of Deadspin and G/O Media.[5]

Nov 4: Barstool’s Homepage

For Deadspin, the majority of their sensationalism involved topics that were completely unrelated to sports in substance, this report isn’t necessarily about the history of those articles. Bill Simmons’ The Ringer shares a similar narrative with Barstool. On the homepage, you’ll find stories about Mr. Robot, Jeopardy, AppleTV+, and The Watchmen. Bleacher Report contrasts the three. The publication leans heavily towards strict sports coverage, a methodology that works for them. But even B/R featured an epic story on Colin Kaepernick written by Rembert Browne. And most recently – a story about Jared Lorenzen, the former Kentucky quarterback who died prematurely. Which brings me to the point: where do you draw the line when your publication covers sports? Collegiate and professional sports represent a layer of American life, not the totality of it. Sports is merely a dimension, not the whole.

No Code and The Business Case FOr: Stick To Sports

OM on Twitter

Let me rewrite this tweet from Jason. 1/ Deadspin writers are immensely talented and have a huge following. They have a lot of goodwill at present and as a result they should Marshall their collective resources and start a new publication. Let’s call it SpunOut. https://t.co/161I1HkInj

The editors and writers who resigned from Deadspin had a basis for their frustration. Sticking to sports is a nearly impossible proposition in today’s media. Given how rare it is to see a media company stick to their original charter, it’s understandable that Deadspin’s former employees saw the charge for what it really was: a euphemism for staying away from covering athletes who’ve immersed themselves in left-leaning causes.

But we’re in an ever-expansive era of digital media. Companies are rewarded for reaching. Complex Media is developing television shows and consulting third parties on commerce and audience development. Barstool Sports has a podcast starring two employees who discuss their friendship and sex lives, and Bleacher Report successfully collaborated on soccer kits with top hip hop artists.

Whatever happens moving forward, the Deadspin that was is no longer. It was one machine of a blog with nearly 30 million monthly visits and a penchant for engaging and re-engaging their loyal readers, many who’d visit the site multiple times per day. But it begs the question, if Deadspin was still Deadspin, what might they have written of Kevin Seifert’s idea? How would it have covered a tweet that should have been more than inconsequential. It’s doubtful that Deadspin may have told the story in the same ways that Barstool, Bleacher Report, ESPN, and The Ringer relayed theirs. To those platforms, the MVP race was not a story at all. But take it from NFL veteran and commentator Cris Collinsworth. As the Ravens led the Patriots, with the crowd in disbelief, Collinsworth quipped:

We’re going to be able to point to quarterbacks in the NFL that got a chance because of this night.

But in 2019, for many digital publishers, that’s too loaded of a statement. But many understood what it meant. And that understanding is part of the story too. The market has a need and the opportunity rests on the journalists who decide to forge their own paths. It’s only right that Deadspin alumni launches a Substack with the call sign of their mandate: Stick to Sports. Used ironically,  of course, as one last jab at the man they called an herb. The publication would almost instantly lead the Substack board.

With that model, Deadspin’s former writers and editors would have the freedom to do it the right way. Anyone who’s ever played the game knows that sports doesn’t end when you step off of the field of play. A sport is America’s pastime, it’s the most watched television event, it’s the most expensive event ticket, it’s the basis of a nation’s network of country and athletic clubs. Across America, hotels are built solely to support a thriving youth sports cultures of areas that would otherwise be barren without its expensive field complexes. Young people wear jerseys and the shoes of sporting legends. And adults bet and cry and yell and travel to watch their teams. It’s the irrationality of it all that reminds us that sticking to sports is an impossible task. And media should reflect that impossibility. Seifert knew the significance of his tweet, America should have known it too.

Доклад Веба Смита | Около 2 часов дня

№ 336: "Цикл большего

Под Rothys и Veja's городских жителей-миллениалов проглядывает едва заметная тенденция. Растет число работников в возрасте 20 и 30 лет, которые предпочитают брать на работе отгулы для поддержания психического здоровья, ссылаясь на переутомление. Товары на основе CBD стали обычным явлением в кассах специализированных магазинов. Приложения и оборудование для медитации входят в моду. Вместо того чтобы потреблять все больше и больше товаров, высокооплачиваемые миллениалы предпочитают брать отгулы. Это изменение приоритетов совпадает с другим: бумом компаний, стремящихся к арбитражу стоимости путем поиска новых путей роста. Компания WeWork, возможно, является лучшим примером этого бизнес-цикла, который рухнул - по требованию - с помощью разгневанного, финансово свободного профессора Нью-Йоркского университета, которому нечего было терять.

Два тренда возглавляют этот отчет: (1) сдвиг в сторону ментального минимализма и (2) отход от цикла "бизнес больше". В январском репортаже BuzzFeed News первая из этих двух тенденций начала набирать обороты в основных средствах массовой информации:

И что теперь? Должен ли я больше медитировать, договариваться о большем количестве свободного времени, делегировать задачи в отношениях, заниматься самопомощью и установить таймеры на своих социальных сетях? Иными словами, как мне оптимизировать себя, чтобы выполнить эти рутинные задачи и теоретически вылечить свое выгорание? Миллениалы, которым уже за тридцать, постоянно задают этот вопрос и не могут дать на него адекватного ответа. Но, возможно, это потому, что это вообще неправильный вопрос.[1]

Каждое ежедневное задание, работа, внеклассное мероприятие и хобби имеют много общих черт друг с другом. Больше, больше, быстрее, больше, лучше и больше. Редко какое ежедневное событие бывает простым, маленьким или незначительным. И это начинает проявляться. Если вы читаете эти строки, то, скорее всего, процветаете в среде, где вы занимаетесь на Peloton или Tonal перед работой, ездите на Uber Black, отвечая на электронные письма на MacBook за 2 000 долларов, принимаете микродозы, чтобы стать "безграничным", периодически поститесь, чтобы оптимизировать свою физическую форму, а затем работаете по двенадцать часов в день, чтобы оплачивать ежемесячную аренду за 3 500 долларов. Откровенно говоря, мы все перегорели. И здесь есть связь: бренды начинают проявлять сочувствие к этому поведенческому течению.

Поэтому легко понять, почему многие из нас так злы. Мировые WeWork были построены на этике позитивных вибраций и единства - в сочетании с тем, что технический аналитик Ранджан Рой называет "высокопарным языком самореализации, напоминающим о горящих людях", который сегодня кажется оскорбительно несовместимым с реальностью жизни людей. Так почему же Pattern или любая другая компания, которая наносит на свои продукты поверхностный слой "жужжащих" слов, способствующих выгоранию, должна быть другой?[2]

Психология потребления - это интерес к стилю жизни, поведению и привычкам. Это всеобъемлющее исследование, которое учитывает наши идиосинкразии, темперамент и даже тонкие черты характера. Именно эти переменные влияют на наше поведение как потребителей. Психографическая сегментация - это анализ образа жизни потребительской когорты с целью создания подробного профиля.[3]

Pattern Brands, группа, стоящая за Gin Lane (RIP), находится в авангарде этой тенденции. Легендарное креативное агентство, которое разработало форму потребления для миллениалов, консультируя Hims, Harrys, Dia & Co, Ayr, Bonobos, Shinola, Stadium Goods и Rockets of Awesome, возвращается к созданию сообщений, которые повлияли на "бизнес-цикл большего". Оглядываясь назад, можно понять, что Recess и Haus были двумя последними DTC-проектами Gin Lane. Завершив успешную кампанию с двумя "душевными" брендами, они как будто телеграфировали о своих планах сосредоточиться на новой эре сообщений.

Что это значит для брендов DTC?

За последние месяцы компания Everlane выпустила свою безударную обувь, Allbirds - аналог Rothy's, Rhone - достойного конкурента Mizzen+Main и Ministry. А компания Away начала закладывать фундамент для работы с товарами повседневного спроса (CPG). Когда-то бренды считали, что они могут построить надежный путь роста, определив одну потребность в продукте и одну потребительскую идентичность.[4]

Масштабируйте быстро, масштабируйте там, масштабируйте сейчас. Это мантра многих современных ведущих цифровых брендов. Многие производители товаров начинали с единственного, ключевого продукта. Затем они перешли на путь роста, соответствующий традиционному бренду категории. Правда, большинство DTC сделали это преждевременно. Напротив, успешные традиционные бренды выходили за рамки своей первоначальной направленности через десять и более лет работы. В нынешнюю эпоху розничной торговли переход от продукта к категории происходит всего за несколько лет. Основатели нанимают талантливых специалистов по продуктам, чтобы удержаться на вершине растущего разнообразия SKU - многие из которых изначально не были предназначены для этого. Представьте себе, например, обувную компанию, разрабатывающую багаж, или компанию, разрабатывающую рубашки для одежды. Для поколения потребителей бизнес-цикл "больше" - это не только студенческие кредиты, растущая арендная плата или крах WeWork. Он также отражает бренды, которые мы потребляем. Кажется, что каждый бренд стремится стать больше, быстрее и сильнее - подсознательное напоминание о том, что мы должны делать то же самое. Ситуация начинает меняться.

В недавней беседе между мной и сотрудницей AdWeek Анн-Мари Алькантарой мы обсудили эти концепции в ходе марафона, который проходил без протокола. Для борьбы с гиперростом, необходимым для получения венчурного финансирования, на ранних стадиях современный бренд-новичок должен больше походить на издателя или сообщество, чем на розничного торговца. Обоснование простое: покупатель мимолетен, а сообщество живет долго. Чаще всего это отражается на брендах с более сильным органическим присутствием. Brooklinen - яркий пример.

Brooklinen: Бренд "Спальня"

Перестав быть просто брендом постельного белья, Brooklinen хочет владеть спальней так же, как Away стремится владеть путешествиями. Дальше их стратегии расходятся. Brooklinen относится к классу компаний, занимающихся производством постельных принадлежностей с использованием цифровых технологий, к которым относятся: Parachute Home, Buffy и Hill House Home Inc. Основанная в 2014 году, компания отчиталась о продажах на сумму около 60 миллионов долларов в 2018 году; дуэт жены и мужа привлек только 10 миллионов долларов на сегодняшний день, что, вероятно, повлияло на их путь роста от компании, производящей продукты, до присутствия в категории. В данном случае ограничение капитала оказалось эффективным механизмом роста.

Снимок экрана 2019-10-28 в 3.51.34 PM
От: earthy-minimalist в Brooklinen

В отличие от многих современных брендов, ориентированных на цифровые технологии, соучредители компании Рич и Вики Фулоп отказались от традиционной схемы "расширения категории" в пользу двустороннего формата рынка, который соответствует вышеупомянутым тенденциям. Потребители будут вознаграждать те бренды, которые предлагают ценность, не пытаясь сделать все. Запуск маркетплейса Spaces получил широкую огласку в СМИ благодаря грамотным сообщениям команды основателей и пиар-работе Линдси Мартинез из Ogilvy, рекордной фирмы Brooklinen по связям с общественностью.

На выставке будет представлено 100 изделий от 12 партнерских брендов (в дополнение к 89 изделиям, созданным Brooklinen). Среди дизайнеров будут как независимые ремесленники, так и признанные бренды, такие как Simply Framed, The Sill, Floyd, Dims и другие.[5]

Этот запуск вызвал любопытство ряда отраслевых наблюдателей, которые еще не были знакомы с партнером Brooklinen по рынку RevCascade или технологическим стеком SaaS-компании. Вместо того чтобы выходить за рамки 89 SKU бренда за счет разработки или "белой этикетки" других продуктов в категории, Brooklinen в партнерстве с RevCascade запустил двустороннюю торговую площадку. При среднемесячной посещаемости в 600 000 - 650 000 посетителей с намерением совершить покупку, предложение сопутствующих товаров от модных брендов, таких как The Sill, решает сразу несколько задач: монетизирует существующий трафик и одновременно расширяет представление потребителей о том, как Brooklinen вписывается в их жизнь.

По словам Веба Смита, основателя платформы для исследования розничной торговли и сообщества 2PM, выход Brooklinen на рынок - это не совсем новая концепция. Это то, что Смит называет линейной коммерцией, когда бренд использует существующую аудиторию для монетизации дальнейшего дохода, роста и трафика.[6]

Является ли Brooklinen менее категоричным брендом, чем Casper? Короткий ответ - нет. Более того, рынок может вознаградить компанию, производящую постельные принадлежности, за ее двустороннюю рыночную стратегию. Компания RevCascade предоставила Brooklinen инструменты, необходимые для запуска гибридной торговой площадки, на которой представлены (1) оптовые (2) прямые (3) и дропшиппинговые товары. Таким образом, подход Brooklinen отражает закон линейной торговли.

При таком количестве новых брендов в разных категориях любой компании трудно "пробиться сквозь беспорядок", - говорит Фулоп.

Команда основателей Brooklinen объединила существующую аудиторию (600 тыс. MAU) с дополнительной коммерческой возможностью. В их случае это удалось сделать без дополнительного найма, разработки или маркетинговых препятствий, связанных с запуском новых продуктов. Благодаря своему подходу они предлагают новые продукты, сохраняя при этом фокус на производстве качественного текстиля.

В комментарии к 2PM: Джош Векслер, соучредитель компании RevCascade:

RevCascade позволяет любому ритейлеру, продавцу электронной коммерции или издателю запустить собственную курируемую торговую площадку или программу дропшиппинга, чтобы поднять свой бренд, лучше обслуживать потребителей и получать новые доходы с нулевым риском для товарных запасов. Утвержденные Brooklinen бренды (они же продавцы или поставщики) используют "мастер регистрации" RevCascade для создания своего профиля, загрузки товарных запасов и настройки параметров доставки. Параллельно с этим, используя автоматизированную интеграцию RevCascade с Shopify для получения данных о товарах, обновлении запасов и данных о транзакциях, Brooklinen смог запустить свою торговую площадку менее чем за 30 дней.

Опираясь на сильную привязанность к основным продуктам компании, Brooklinen получил конкурентное преимущество по обоим показателям: DTC и marketplace. Рассмотрим Verishop, популярный, хорошо управляемый и капитализированный маркетплейс, который был запущен в июле 2019 года:

[table id=49 /]

Обсуждаем ли мы подход Pattern Brands к устранению культуры выгорания или влияние цикла more на постоянно переполненный рынок быстрорастущих брендов, партнерство Brooklinen с RevCascade может послужить примером для многих их коллег. Потребители устали от компаний, которые стремятся расти ради роста. Для них это напоминание об их собственной жизни, которая проходит в быстром темпе и под высоким давлением.

Консьюмеризм всегда будет существовать в той или иной форме, но беспорядок брендов, стремящихся дорасти до следующего рубежа, может многим не понравиться. От Мари Кондо до Core Meditation, культура беспорядка стала катализатором средств от выгорания. На сегодняшнем рынке будут вознаграждены те, кто предлагает легкость, ценность и простоту. Бренд обязан внести свой вклад в решение проблемы, а не в цикл увеличения количества.

Читайте материал № 336 здесь.

Репортаж подготовлен Вебом Смитом и отредактирован Трейси Уоллес | Около 2 часов дня