Memo: Enter MrBeast

Every industry is overdue for a digital-first reset. Even casual restaurants are beginning to adjust to a brave new world, accelerated like many other categories by the pandemic.

By and large, foot traffic slowed at shopping malls. Retailers and department stores earned the majority of the media’s attention, but in the process, tens of millions of square feet in commercial kitchens and dining rooms were going to waste. The wage workers who ran them suffered from job losses. Restaurants were sinking into bankruptcy by the dozen. Over the last year, new concepts began to take shape based on proven experiments. To better understand those experiments, I spoke with one of the foremost experts.

When Kat Cole calls to discuss the inner workings of food service, you answer the phone. There aren’t many executives with more knowledge or experience than her. Cole is stepping down after 10 years of success and innovation as President and COO at Focus Brands, the parent company to a number of mall dining fixtures that you’ve likely walked past thousands of times on shopping trips. Leading a company with billions in annual sales, Cole understands the power of placement and foot traffic. While customers aren’t walking past quite as often as they did before the pandemic, she was still incredibly optimistic about the prospects of her industry. Concepts like Nextbite and Virtual Dining Concepts (VDC) have revolutionized the casual dining industry. But the business isn’t new.

As early as 2016, UberEats tested virtual kitchens as a strategy to drive revenue for restaurants with excess production capacity. Today, there are over 5,000 virtual brands on UberEats across the country. Early on, in a partnership with a well-known casual wing chain, Uber tested a virtual brand concept within the Eats app to improve sales by rebranding their wings to reach a wider audience. It worked. When eCommerce met human resources and excess production capacity, a new vertical in dining was born. Today, this industry, also populated by GrubHub, DoorDash, and Postmates (which Uber recently acquired) is in the midst of another evolution.

A recent article on Today.com began with:

Ghost kitchen, dark kitchen, virtual kitchen, cloud kitchen, whatever you call them, they’re popping up everywhere, with estimates placing the number at 1,500 in the United States. [1]

Virtual kitchens and ghost, dark, or cloud kitchens are not all interchangeable. A “ghost” establishment, in this context, is essentially a commissary kitchen or a facility where restaurants produce food for distribution to their satellite locations. Former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick acquires real estate and converts them into food production facilities through his company CloudKitchens. Platforms like DoorDash, UberEats, and Postmates then markets the many brands that are built atop of the physical infrastructure. CloudKitchens recently raised $400 million from Goldman Sachs and the Saudi Arabia wealth fund to finance these real estate acquisitions.

Companies like Robert Earl’s Virtual Dining Concepts partners with existing restaurants to monetize excess capacity. And like many restaurants that rely on foot traffic at mall complexes, there is quite a bit of it. Earl isn’t just the owner of VDC. He has stakes in casual dining chains like Buca Di Beppo, Mixology, and Planet Hollywood. In June of 2020, Earl’s latest acquisition turned heads. The ownership  group of Bravo and Brio filed for bankruptcy just three months earlier due to a COVID-related hit to its already flailing business. Earl seemed to have another vision for them.

Earl Enterprises, the parent company of Buca di Beppo, Earl of Sandwich and Planet Hollywood, has confirmed the purchase of Bravo Cucina Italian and Brio Tuscan Grille restaurants in a deal that will bring back 4,000 employees left in “limbo” since FoodFirst filed for bankruptcy, Robert Earl, chairman of Earl Enterprises, said Thursday. [2]

Earl acquired capacity in much the same way that Kalanick’s CloudKitchens acquired real estate to build functional facilities. But in Earl’s hybrid format, he can accomplish both dining formats. Virtual Dining Concepts is driving high-margin business to this suite of causal restaurants. If they survive the pandemic, they will be able to service traditional and online customers at once. This isn’t unlike any other restaurant that delivers. What organizations like Nextbite and VDC are building adds a significant layer atop of the Olo-driven last-mile delivery network.

Companies like Olo provide the interface between restaurants, their ordering systems and the on-demand ecosystem. With excess capacity at casual dining and a need for new demand, celebrity-driven virtual dining has emerged as a new prospect for a suffering industry. It just might work.

Within the next year, Virtual Dining Concepts, a subsidiary of Earl Enterprises has a goal of reaching 20 celebrity and 20 consumer brands in its delivery portfolio. The pandemic, combined with targeted social media advertising and the omnipresence of delivery platforms have brewed the perfect storm to fill a massive supply of kitchen capacity with these new concepts. [3]

The economics favor restaurant ownership groups that can typically earn nearly 60% of the gross margin of each sale. The celebrity that generates interest for the sale can earn as much as 25% for a sale that that they had little to do with. It’s a brilliant system. And thanks to a recent partnership with a YouTube creator, it’s about to become a popular option for ailing foodservice retailers.

Linear Commerce: Enter MrBeast

I downloaded the app (currently No. 1 in the app store), manually inputted my address and billing information and then waited for the branded sandwich. Constructed within the kitchen of one of Robert Earl’s Bravo restaurants, the “I launched 300 burger restaurants nationwide” promise was met with operational efficiency. When I ordered the Beast Style burger, I was surprised that it arrived with 15 minutes of purchase. I photographed it and laughed at the fact that Jimmy “MrBeast” Donaldson was going to successfully store hundreds of thousands of new credit card numbers thanks to this promotion, including my own. And then I walked upstairs to hand it off to my teenage daughter.

Oh my god, Dad. How did you get this? I love MrBeast. Oh my god.

At 13 years old, she’s adept at understanding the world of creators and their collective impact on culture, commerce, and trends. But even I was surprised that she was excited for a burger that she wouldn’t have otherwise eaten without the branding.

Jimmy Donaldson has quite the story. In a 2019 interview with Casey Neistat, the two creators discuss his improbable rise from obscurity to nearly 50 million Youtube subscribers. The 22-year-old owns an audience larger than most multinational media companies.

Donaldson represents a new class of creator with the power to move entire retail markets. In a recent conversation with DTC titan Nik Sharma, he mentioned an eye opening figure.

Was just looking at 2PM DTC Power List and as I was looking through, I wondered if you’d ever put creator brands that crush it. I think definitely Danny Duncan’s brand. I mean he’ll do nine figures in revenue with $0 ad spend.

For the vast majority of direct-to-consumer retail, achieving a $100 million revenue mark is highly improbable. Doing so without advertising is impossible. For the top 1% of creators, commerce is just a natural progression. They will earn far more in retail sales than through advertising.

Sin título

Here’s how much the biggest YouTube stars earned this year:1. Ryan Kaji: $29.5M2. MrBeast: $24M3. Dude Perfect: $23M4. Rhett and Link: $20M5. Markiplier: $19.5M6. Preston Arsement: $19M7. Nastya: $18.5M8. Blippi: $17M9. David Dobrik: $15.5M10. Jeffree Star: $15M

Ryan Kaji, the 9-year-old toy reviewer, has an omnichannel toy empire worth over $500 million by some estimation. What began as a trend of marketing merchandise has evolved as other industries have adopted eCommerce strategies. The digital layer provided by VDC, Olo, Nextbite, and others has provided new opportunity for this class of creators.

Before year’s end, you’ll see Marques Brownies and Dobrik’s Dumplings. And while the creators will certainly line their pockets, Robert Earl’s foresight into this marketing strategy is due to revolutionize an industry crippled by the lack of foot traffic that leaders like Kat Cole once relied upon to fuel growth in the industry.

MrBeast wasn’t the first creator to put his mark on a fast casual product. But this partnership will be the most transformative for an industry in need.

When this partnership was announced, it was common to see skepticism from commerce industry veterans and advertising executives. One chimed in: “I can’t figure out what’s even really that interesting about it, but I’m new to Mr. Beast.” Another added: “I still don’t see the connection to helping restaurants and charity?” But what’s truer than ever is that commerce follows audience. And the physics of building brands the traditional way is erased by the new mechanisms of linear commerce at scale. For a creator who spends a great deal of his time performing acts of charity, there seems to be more scale on the way, and not just for a struggling restaurant industry, but for the 50 million subscribers who’ve cheered him as he’s turned sponsorships and personal earnings into viral giveaways.

Wherever 50 million fans go, industries will be disrupted. Sometimes for the better.

Por Web Smith | Redacción: Hilary Milnes | Arte: Alex Remy | About 2PM

Memo: The DoorDash OS

DoorDash has an opportunity to power an evolved, local commerce economy where urbanization has taken a back seat to remote work, the homestead is more relevant than ever before, and the “arming of the rebels” has yet to capture the imagination of Main Street businesses. This is bigger than late night takeout: Food delivery is to DoorDash what book sales were to Amazon.

A singular failure has shaped my understanding of commerce and how digital would influence physical retail. In 2014, eCommerce accounted for just 7.7% of US retail sales, the investment into urbanization had a positive trajectory, and apps like Postmates and DoorDash had begun to eat market share of incumbents like Grubhub. With that backdrop, a close friend and I pieced together a mobile application with a simple marketplace function. It featured an open chat room to guide users through recommendations, sales, and checkout.

The experiment had one goal: To understand if eCommerce could improve the viability of local, analog retail businesses. To do so, we targeted hard goods (not food products). We built atop Uber’s then-available pricing API and enabled independent retailers to market their products within our app and ship products as far as 20 miles outside of the city. Uber’s drivers delivered the goods to their homes.

To accomplish this, we indexed the goods of independent retailers and tracked inventory with a relatively light integration that relied on imported Quickbooks data. And then each product’s corresponding image was pulled into the app through .JSON web calls. Given that the vast majority of featured stores were within a mile of us, contractors were tasked with acquiring the goods and bringing them to a central location to stage for delivery by Uber. The last shipment left by the close of business and inventory was painstakingly updated upon the completion of each business day. In just under a year, the app sold $627,000 in top line sales at an average margin of around 17%.

That’s where the positives ended. The price of doing business with Uber was costly and the fleet of drivers was subpar, causing a number of customer service issues. The demand for hard goods was outpaced by the demand for perishable goods (food). And the area’s physical retail scene was a draw, so most consumers opted to walk, drive, or bike over instead. The app eventually amounted to an expensive experiment in between jobs.

The Difference: Now and Then

The experiment wasn’t a complete failure, however. By the time that we shut the application down, we’d developed a better understanding of the intersections between real estate, retail, technology, and the limitations of small businesses. I also learned an important lesson about eCommerce adoption: 2014 was far too early. Today, the former 7.7% share of retail (in 2014) sales has tripled. Nearly one of every four dollars is spent online in 2020.

Given that our focus was on non-coastal markets and second-tier cities, the marketplace helped us understand the needs of retailers outside of the country’s main retail hubs: Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, and so on. The app experience was nowhere near perfect, but the experiment was valuable. I went on to build DTC brands, founding 2PM Inc just a year later. That friend of mine became the founder of Loop Returns.

Fast forward and many of the retailers who once considered eCommerce a distraction have now invested heavily into building online retail as a primary channel. Consider Josh Quinn of Ohio’s Tiger Tree, a multi-million dollar independent retailer and former partner of our app experiment. Quinn recently shuttered Tiger Tree’s doors to pursue an eCommerce-first strategy. He said:

It’s an interesting example of just how fast retail has accelerated in six years. To say I don’t think my customers would have seen the utility in an on-demand delivery solution seems laughable now. But we could have been better positioned. We did so well as brick-and-mortar stores that it kept us from investing the way we should have. It hurts to think of where we’d be if we would have put the time into eCommerce back then.

Quinn is representative of a large swath of retailers who relied upon a brick-and-mortar business before the pandemic. But he won’t make the mistake again. He added: “We are in the middle of local online retail being a thing. Almost half of our eCommerce orders go to the Columbus, Ohio area.”

This is the new economy that DoorDash is primed to capture. The permanence of remote work culture and the restrictions placed on urban dining and nightlife has spawned three separate trends. There is a shift from major cities to smaller ones, urban flight to suburban “cities”, and housing to the all-encompassing homestead.

Sanitized urbanization removes the perceived risks of living in urban areas while adding the value of – what’s often – upgraded infrastructure, improved schools, and lower tax bases. [2PM, 1]

As remote work and distance learning continues to become more commonplace, entertainment, commerce, and utility will shift from physical to digital as well. There has been an extraordinary shift from thinking along the lines of office perks to thinking about optimizing the home. Consider Wayfair’s sudden shift of fortune. In 2017, the furniture reseller traded at a $5 billion market cap. Today it trades at nearly $26 billion, a growth emblematic of a boom in redesigning the home for modern needs: remote work, leisure, and comfort.

If this is any indication of how small business owners will react to these macroeconomic changes, we can expect second and third-order effects in the housing market to continue to materialize.

Inside The Home

Like Postmates, which has long tested hard goods marketplace capabilities, DoorDash’s opportunity lies with supporting the businesses of independent retailers by providing new opportunity for them. Not just by delivering the goods but by fostering a marketplace that expands their reach to wider, local audiences. By streamlining retailers as sources of goods and developing new initiatives to reach customers, their marketplace partners will be more inclined to view DoorDash as an effective customer acquisition engine.

A possible future as DoorDash embraces the shift to the homestead (and innovative demand-gen partnerships).

Success or failure will depend on growth beyond food delivery as the core model. This means that the development of efficient customer acquisition, fair and incentivized pay for its last-mile workforce, and paths to hyper growth in gross merchandising volume are key to the company’s long term viability. Consider this excerpt from a recent analysis on DoorDash:

That inability to change the business model is also likely to keep DoorDash from making any meaningful profit. Grubhub, the only US food delivery service on the stock market, recently complained that food delivery is not enough to build a sustainable and profitable business. [2]

By instituting a local marketplace model, DoorDash would encourage retailers like Quinn who find value in reaching more customers in their cities without relying upon the postal service for delivery. Quinn cited his frustration with existing local shipping models:

Independent retailers like us are facing something of a crisis with USPS shipments being delayed. Not that I am blaming them – I understand the strains on their system.

Amazon Prime has popularized next day and same day delivery. Services like HBO Max have begun to shift resources away from physical theaters and towards home-streaming models. And founded a year before our local commerce experiment, DoorDash is now trading at $55.6 billion. Like Jeff Bezos former marketplace of books, Tony Xu’s marketplace of local retailers is in its infancy. While intended for restaurants, the technology could easily be applied to retailers. And while DoorDash touts partnerships with large and sophisticated companies (Macy’s, etc), the delivery app’s real opportunity lies with locally-owned retailers who’d rely on DoorDash for the technical expertise and the audience to grow their businesses – a model that not even Shopify could compete with right now.

In its short existence, DoorDash has evolved well beyond just  delivery logistics, adding services like Storefront, which enables merchants to set up digital ordering directly from their native channels. [3]

We look at apps like DoorDash and see food delivery. Rather, view them as the last-mile enabler for businesses who are leaning into localized eCommerce. Food delivery, alone, will not justify the $50+ billion market cap but a city-by-city network of local retailers may. This is the eCommerce era now. Like every other retailer, DoorDash must learn to create new demand and service it with creative solutions. I suspect that the company’s reach will soon extend beyond your kitchen or your mobile phones. In the near future, the app may function more like a retail operating system.

Por Web Smith | Redacción: Hilary Milnes | Arte: Alex Remy | About 2PM

Memo: El más listo de la sala

Apofenia es una palabra que desde hace tiempo considero una de las más importantes de la lengua inglesa. Tanto un fenómeno normal como anormal según la agudeza mental de cada uno, su connotación es compleja. Es la capacidad de encontrar conexiones significativas entre ideas no relacionadas. Las ideas y la comunidad son el combustible de este fenómeno.

El papel de la apofenia en la historia está infravalorado. El Siglo de las Luces impulsó a la humanidad de forma extraordinaria. La invención del café europeo fue uno de los pilares de este periodo. Cafeinadas con productos importados y libres de los embotamientos de los alcoholes del Renacimiento, las ideas académicas y sociales tomaron forma en salas dominadas por hombres que hablaban enérgica y obedientemente como si fuera su única contribución a la sociedad.

El café europeo, o la "universidad del céntimo", democratizó la síntesis de la información de un modo que antes era exclusivo de las universidades. Fomentaba la conversación, el debate y la autoría entre participantes activos y oyentes curiosos por igual. Las ideas eran valiosas. Imaginemos un barco con una pequeña vía de agua cerca de la proa. Sólo una tabla de madera fortificada puede proporcionar la estabilidad que el barco necesita para soportar las pruebas y los rigores del mar. Como tablones endurecidos de madera resistente al mar, las ideas de la época de la Ilustración taponaban los cascos de los barcos construidos por otros. La idea de una persona completaba la de otra. Rara vez era la persona más inteligente de la sala la que recibía el crédito definitivo por la creación final. Pero si uno estaba en ese café el tiempo suficiente, lo más probable es que saliera con una creación propia.

En teoría, los foros digitales son los cafés de esta era. Las revelaciones que antaño se encontraban en las "penny universities" del Londres del siglo XVIII son hoy comunidades digitales de conocimiento compartido. En The Social Architecture of Impactful Communities, de Nick deWilde, se explica:

Los individuos suelen "contratar" comunidades para llevar a cabo transiciones que requieren una conexión humana. Un fundador de una startup que quiere convertirse en un mejor líder solicita a Leaders in Tech el tipo de feedback sincero que necesita para crecer profesionalmente.

Por eso, en parte, las ideas son valiosas: pueden cumplir la función de comunidad. Las ideas pueden solidificarse en una masa endurecida, capaz de mantener otro barco a flote. Sin embargo, se escriben infinidad de ensayos anclados en la idea de que "las ideas no importan". Estos sabios escritores seguirán explicando que si no puedes ejecutar esas ideas, tus palabras o pensamientos carecen de valor. Estos autores defienden el valor de la ejecución. No te equivoques, la cultura del ajetreo se subió a la misma ola. Por lo tanto, no estoy de acuerdo.

Pensemos en el fallecido paleontólogo, biólogo e historiador de la ciencia estadounidense Stephen Gould:

Mi talento es hacer conexiones. Por eso soy ensayista. También por eso mi trabajo técnico está estructurado como lo está. ¿Cómo interactúan las partes de la concha del caracol? ¿Cuáles son los ritmos de crecimiento? ¿Se puede ver un patrón? Siempre estoy intentando ver un patrón en este bosque y me encanta poder hacerlo. ... Puedo sentarme sobre cualquier tema y pensar en unas 20 cosas que se relacionan con él y no son conexiones cursis.

Gould tardó años en darse cuenta de que se trataba de una habilidad. A veces, las personas más inteligentes de la sala son las que reflexionan sobre los problemas de la sociedad, las deficiencias del sector o las innovaciones que cambian las reglas del juego. Estas ideas llegan a los principales medios de comunicación, a importantes fuentes de Twitter o a expertos del sector que repiten frases sin necesidad de citar dónde las han oído. Y gracias a estas ideas, los medios de comunicación ganan más clics, los seguidores de Twitter crecen y los expertos del sector reciben una compensación por sus apariciones. Entonces, ¿por qué algunos ideadores necesitan ejecutar para demostrar su valía, mientras que otros ganan valor percibido simplemente porque han encontrado una audiencia?

La capacidad de aprovechar las ideas y convertirlas en inventos, infraestructuras, productos o arte es una habilidad poco común que debe valorarse. Esto es cierto. Pero la oportunidad de hacerlo no siempre está repartida equitativamente. Muchos de los mejores pensadores son constructores por derecho propio pero, por infinidad de razones, sus ideas no siempre se les atribuyen.

El medio de comunicación de la época desempeña un papel considerable en la forma en que se atribuyen las ideas.

Los griegos más notables eran oradores. Los líderes de la época colonial estadounidense escribieron voluminosos tratados y cartas. Alexander Hamilton, uno de los creadores más prolíficos de la historia, escribió 85 artículos y ensayos entre 1788 y 1789. A principios del siglo XX surgió la radio. Franklin D. Roosevelt trascendió el poder de los discursos pronunciados por la mayoría de los presidentes anteriores al utilizar la radio para instruir e inspirar a los estadounidenses. En la década de 1960 la televisión ocupó el centro del escenario. Un apuesto John F. Kennedy se impuso en un debate televisado, mientras que Richard Nixon fue el ganador para la mayoría de los que sintonizaban la transmisión radiofónica.

Internet fue pionera en un nuevo tipo de líder de pensamiento a principios de la década de 2000. Hoy estamos en pleno auge de los medios de comunicación basados en texto, ya sea a través de Twitter o de boletines informativos. Los mismos métodos que antaño prosperaron en los cafés de Europa perviven en plataformas como Reddit, Twitter, Substack, Slack y foros privados.

Con el ánimo de destacar a los más inteligentes de la sala, he aquí una serie de líderes empresariales, ejecutivos y consultores del ecosistema 2PM que tienen las ideas que hacen avanzar a las industrias.

Cuando Naj Austin hizo la apuesta por Ethel's Club en 2018, debería haber podido recaudar dinero fácilmente basándose en la idea de que los marginados merecían un lugar con mentalidad comunitaria para congregarse. Ese mismo año, The Wing recaudó 117 millones de dólares para ampliar sus servicios a su núcleo demográfico, mientras que Austin estaba esencialmente raspando para construir sobre su colección de ideas.

Lo que más me impresionó de Austin fue su capacidad para dar un giro hacia los servicios digitales para la comunidad de Ethel's Club cuando la pandemia empezó a perturbar los negocios minoristas físicos como el suyo y The Wing a principios de 2020. La agilidad de Austin dio sus frutos y ahora está recaudando fondos para su próxima empresa, Somewhere Good.

Puedes seguir las ideas de Naj en Twitter.

Antes de que Brittany Chavez tuviera una plataforma de comercio electrónico sostenible sobre la que construir su mercado, ya había tomado su idea de un recurso para su comunidad "Shop Latinx" y construido una audiencia a su alrededor con su cofundador Miles Montes. Su cuenta de Instagram ha alcanzado más de 60.000 seguidores y clientes de lo que los medios llaman "Etsy para latinos". Halie LeSavage, de Morning Brew, explicó por qué su empresa respaldada por Techstars podría funcionar:

Como 2020 no deja de recordarnos, la Generación Z y los millennials son inflexibles a la hora de comprar sus valores. Y los compradores latinos son un poderoso grupo de consumidores: Según Nielsen, en 2023 gastarán más de 1,9 billones de dólares en Estados Unidos.[2]

Si hay algo que he aprendido de Chavez es que es resistente, que no se detiene hasta que sus ideas toman forma, que acepta las ideas de los demás y que reconoce el mérito cuando es debido. Su colectivo de más de 60.000 consumidores y fans estará de acuerdo.

Puedes seguir las ideas de Brittany en Twitter (y aquí hasta que Twitter arregle su cuenta original).

Conocí a Sherrell en la Asociación Nacional de Periodistas Negros en Miami, Florida, en 2018. Sentada con Dan Runcie, de Trapital, cada una explicamos nuestras ideas y lo que esperábamos para nuestras empresas de medios independientes a una pequeña sala de asistentes. En aquel momento, su última empresa, The Plug, estaba en pañales. Hoy en día, es uno de los recursos de la industria tecnológica de los que más se depende. Considere este informe del Seattle Times de agosto de 2020.

No se imaginaba que su boletín se convertiría en un negocio mediático en sí mismo, pero The Plug -que toma su nombre de un término coloquial para referirse a alguien que conoce a todo el mundo y "está al tanto de todo", dice Dorsey- despegó.

Obtuvo un máster en periodismo de datos en la Escuela de Periodismo de la Universidad de Columbia, centrándose en cómo los datos pueden ayudar a "contar mejores historias sobre los grupos infrarrepresentados en la tecnología", dice Dorsey al explicar su tesis. [3]

Sherrell está construyendo una de las empresas más cruciales en recursos humanos. Y aunque ahora todas las empresas tecnológicas quieren contratarla lejos de su idea convertida en creación, sospecho que tendrá más impacto de forma independiente.

Puede seguir las ideas de Sherrell en Twitter.

Acreditada con el lanzamiento de la rentable división de contenido en la famosa agencia de relaciones públicas Derris, Grace García Clarke es una de las pensadoras más curiosas y libres en el espacio donde se cruzan la agencia y los medios de comunicación. Nuestra primera interacción fue un debate en diciembre de 2019 dentro de la comunidad Lean Luxe de Paul Munford sobre los méritos del chapucero anuncio de Peloton y lo que significaría para la fortuna de la empresa.

Antes trabajaba para Derris, pero ahora es independiente y muy codiciada. Las marcas recurren a ella para la comunicación, la investigación del sector y su buen ojo para entender lo que los estirados hombres de negocios no entienden. Un ejemplo de ello es su exhaustivo análisis de productos para The Strategist, de la revista New York Magazine, en el que recabó las opiniones de docenas de usuarios de TikTok de la Generación Z para publicar uno de los artículos de mayor repercusión de la publicación.

No hay producto que se venda más rápido en TikTok que los productos de belleza, ya sea un kit de laminación de cejas DIY, polvos de afeitar para hombres o un gel de ducha que cuesta exactamente 1 $. Y como la aplicación está dominada por adolescentes, muchas de estas cosas son fáciles para la cartera (o la mesada, por así decirlo). Para averiguar qué está a la altura, hemos pasado horas intercambiando cientos de mensajes de texto con influencers de TikTok. [4]

Cuando se le da autonomía para tomar decisiones en favor de las empresas con las que colabora, éstas salen beneficiadas. Debería saberlo; es una colaboradora frecuente en 2PM.

Puedes seguir las ideas de Grace en Twitter.

Andrea Hernández es un oráculo de los bienes de consumo envasados. Su trabajo con Snaxshot es el fruto de una idea que ha mantenido durante mucho tiempo: una editorialización de los datos detrás de las tendencias de alimentos y bienes de consumo. Natural de San Pedro Sula, Cortés (Honduras), he visto cómo su audiencia en torno a Snaxshot empezaba a trascender su nicho. Hernández es también la fundadora de Mood Food Snacks, por lo que tiene una visión aguda del mercado en general. En un reciente reportaje de Morning Brew se presentaron sus ideas sobre CPG y distribución durante la pandemia y más allá:

Veremos el auge de las "tiendas oscuras", como Amazon, que acaba de lanzar su primer Whole Foods solo en línea en Brooklyn, que se centrará únicamente en satisfacer los pedidos de comestibles realizados en línea, y DoorDash, que lanzó DashMart.[5]

Cuando escribe sobre CPG, la escucho. Sus ideas han sido increíblemente valiosas y Snaxshot crecerá gracias a ellas.

Puedes seguir las ideas de Andrea en Twitter.

Esta lista podría continuar. La idea de las ideas está mal entendida. Mientras que las grandes audiencias de la primera era de Internet eran los vencedores con el botín, la era de los boletines informativos está haciendo aflorar nuevas ideas en el núcleo. La convención de la concordancia de patrones está dando paso lentamente al mérito del pensador.

Por supuesto, las ideas geniales y monetizables siguen siendo filtradas y destacadas por las fuentes dominantes. CNBC, Vogue y LA Times seguirán llevándose el mérito del trabajo de audiencias más reducidas. Pero si hay algo que he notado es que esta era ha empezado a acortar la distancia entre los creadores de ideas agudas y las grandes audiencias que quieren oírlas.

De este modo, las ideas nunca han sido tan valiosas, porque ya no se piensa que sea algo binario, nunca lo fue. No hay ideadores y ejecutores. Más bien, las ideas existen a lo largo de un espectro en el que los pensamientos novedosos pueden conducir a la oportunidad. Estos activos intangibles son una moneda de cambio, ahora más que nunca. Y ya es hora de que empecemos a reconocer a los más listos de la sala mientras todavía están avanzando. No será por mucho tiempo.

Por Web Smith | Redacción: Hilary Milnes | Arte: Alex Remy | About 2PM