Memo: Enter MrBeast

Every industry is overdue for a digital-first reset. Even casual restaurants are beginning to adjust to a brave new world, accelerated like many other categories by the pandemic.

By and large, foot traffic slowed at shopping malls. Retailers and department stores earned the majority of the media’s attention, but in the process, tens of millions of square feet in commercial kitchens and dining rooms were going to waste. The wage workers who ran them suffered from job losses. Restaurants were sinking into bankruptcy by the dozen. Over the last year, new concepts began to take shape based on proven experiments. To better understand those experiments, I spoke with one of the foremost experts.

When Kat Cole calls to discuss the inner workings of food service, you answer the phone. There aren’t many executives with more knowledge or experience than her. Cole is stepping down after 10 years of success and innovation as President and COO at Focus Brands, the parent company to a number of mall dining fixtures that you’ve likely walked past thousands of times on shopping trips. Leading a company with billions in annual sales, Cole understands the power of placement and foot traffic. While customers aren’t walking past quite as often as they did before the pandemic, she was still incredibly optimistic about the prospects of her industry. Concepts like Nextbite and Virtual Dining Concepts (VDC) have revolutionized the casual dining industry. But the business isn’t new.

As early as 2016, UberEats tested virtual kitchens as a strategy to drive revenue for restaurants with excess production capacity. Today, there are over 5,000 virtual brands on UberEats across the country. Early on, in a partnership with a well-known casual wing chain, Uber tested a virtual brand concept within the Eats app to improve sales by rebranding their wings to reach a wider audience. It worked. When eCommerce met human resources and excess production capacity, a new vertical in dining was born. Today, this industry, also populated by GrubHub, DoorDash, and Postmates (which Uber recently acquired) is in the midst of another evolution.

A recent article on Today.com began with:

Ghost kitchen, dark kitchen, virtual kitchen, cloud kitchen, whatever you call them, they’re popping up everywhere, with estimates placing the number at 1,500 in the United States. [1]

Virtual kitchens and ghost, dark, or cloud kitchens are not all interchangeable. A “ghost” establishment, in this context, is essentially a commissary kitchen or a facility where restaurants produce food for distribution to their satellite locations. Former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick acquires real estate and converts them into food production facilities through his company CloudKitchens. Platforms like DoorDash, UberEats, and Postmates then markets the many brands that are built atop of the physical infrastructure. CloudKitchens recently raised $400 million from Goldman Sachs and the Saudi Arabia wealth fund to finance these real estate acquisitions.

Companies like Robert Earl’s Virtual Dining Concepts partners with existing restaurants to monetize excess capacity. And like many restaurants that rely on foot traffic at mall complexes, there is quite a bit of it. Earl isn’t just the owner of VDC. He has stakes in casual dining chains like Buca Di Beppo, Mixology, and Planet Hollywood. In June of 2020, Earl’s latest acquisition turned heads. The ownership  group of Bravo and Brio filed for bankruptcy just three months earlier due to a COVID-related hit to its already flailing business. Earl seemed to have another vision for them.

Earl Enterprises, the parent company of Buca di Beppo, Earl of Sandwich and Planet Hollywood, has confirmed the purchase of Bravo Cucina Italian and Brio Tuscan Grille restaurants in a deal that will bring back 4,000 employees left in “limbo” since FoodFirst filed for bankruptcy, Robert Earl, chairman of Earl Enterprises, said Thursday. [2]

Earl acquired capacity in much the same way that Kalanick’s CloudKitchens acquired real estate to build functional facilities. But in Earl’s hybrid format, he can accomplish both dining formats. Virtual Dining Concepts is driving high-margin business to this suite of causal restaurants. If they survive the pandemic, they will be able to service traditional and online customers at once. This isn’t unlike any other restaurant that delivers. What organizations like Nextbite and VDC are building adds a significant layer atop of the Olo-driven last-mile delivery network.

Companies like Olo provide the interface between restaurants, their ordering systems and the on-demand ecosystem. With excess capacity at casual dining and a need for new demand, celebrity-driven virtual dining has emerged as a new prospect for a suffering industry. It just might work.

Within the next year, Virtual Dining Concepts, a subsidiary of Earl Enterprises has a goal of reaching 20 celebrity and 20 consumer brands in its delivery portfolio. The pandemic, combined with targeted social media advertising and the omnipresence of delivery platforms have brewed the perfect storm to fill a massive supply of kitchen capacity with these new concepts. [3]

The economics favor restaurant ownership groups that can typically earn nearly 60% of the gross margin of each sale. The celebrity that generates interest for the sale can earn as much as 25% for a sale that that they had little to do with. It’s a brilliant system. And thanks to a recent partnership with a YouTube creator, it’s about to become a popular option for ailing foodservice retailers.

Linear Commerce: Enter MrBeast

I downloaded the app (currently No. 1 in the app store), manually inputted my address and billing information and then waited for the branded sandwich. Constructed within the kitchen of one of Robert Earl’s Bravo restaurants, the “I launched 300 burger restaurants nationwide” promise was met with operational efficiency. When I ordered the Beast Style burger, I was surprised that it arrived with 15 minutes of purchase. I photographed it and laughed at the fact that Jimmy “MrBeast” Donaldson was going to successfully store hundreds of thousands of new credit card numbers thanks to this promotion, including my own. And then I walked upstairs to hand it off to my teenage daughter.

Oh my god, Dad. How did you get this? I love MrBeast. Oh my god.

At 13 years old, she’s adept at understanding the world of creators and their collective impact on culture, commerce, and trends. But even I was surprised that she was excited for a burger that she wouldn’t have otherwise eaten without the branding.

Jimmy Donaldson has quite the story. In a 2019 interview with Casey Neistat, the two creators discuss his improbable rise from obscurity to nearly 50 million Youtube subscribers. The 22-year-old owns an audience larger than most multinational media companies.

Donaldson represents a new class of creator with the power to move entire retail markets. In a recent conversation with DTC titan Nik Sharma, he mentioned an eye opening figure.

Was just looking at 2PM DTC Power List and as I was looking through, I wondered if you’d ever put creator brands that crush it. I think definitely Danny Duncan’s brand. I mean he’ll do nine figures in revenue with $0 ad spend.

For the vast majority of direct-to-consumer retail, achieving a $100 million revenue mark is highly improbable. Doing so without advertising is impossible. For the top 1% of creators, commerce is just a natural progression. They will earn far more in retail sales than through advertising.

Sem título

Here’s how much the biggest YouTube stars earned this year:1. Ryan Kaji: $29.5M2. MrBeast: $24M3. Dude Perfect: $23M4. Rhett and Link: $20M5. Markiplier: $19.5M6. Preston Arsement: $19M7. Nastya: $18.5M8. Blippi: $17M9. David Dobrik: $15.5M10. Jeffree Star: $15M

Ryan Kaji, the 9-year-old toy reviewer, has an omnichannel toy empire worth over $500 million by some estimation. What began as a trend of marketing merchandise has evolved as other industries have adopted eCommerce strategies. The digital layer provided by VDC, Olo, Nextbite, and others has provided new opportunity for this class of creators.

Before year’s end, you’ll see Marques Brownies and Dobrik’s Dumplings. And while the creators will certainly line their pockets, Robert Earl’s foresight into this marketing strategy is due to revolutionize an industry crippled by the lack of foot traffic that leaders like Kat Cole once relied upon to fuel growth in the industry.

MrBeast wasn’t the first creator to put his mark on a fast casual product. But this partnership will be the most transformative for an industry in need.

When this partnership was announced, it was common to see skepticism from commerce industry veterans and advertising executives. One chimed in: “I can’t figure out what’s even really that interesting about it, but I’m new to Mr. Beast.” Another added: “I still don’t see the connection to helping restaurants and charity?” But what’s truer than ever is that commerce follows audience. And the physics of building brands the traditional way is erased by the new mechanisms of linear commerce at scale. For a creator who spends a great deal of his time performing acts of charity, there seems to be more scale on the way, and not just for a struggling restaurant industry, but for the 50 million subscribers who’ve cheered him as he’s turned sponsorships and personal earnings into viral giveaways.

Wherever 50 million fans go, industries will be disrupted. Sometimes for the better.

Por Web Smith | Editor: Hilary Milnes | Arte: Alex Remy | About 2PM

Memo: The DoorDash OS

DoorDash has an opportunity to power an evolved, local commerce economy where urbanization has taken a back seat to remote work, the homestead is more relevant than ever before, and the “arming of the rebels” has yet to capture the imagination of Main Street businesses. This is bigger than late night takeout: Food delivery is to DoorDash what book sales were to Amazon.

A singular failure has shaped my understanding of commerce and how digital would influence physical retail. In 2014, eCommerce accounted for just 7.7% of US retail sales, the investment into urbanization had a positive trajectory, and apps like Postmates and DoorDash had begun to eat market share of incumbents like Grubhub. With that backdrop, a close friend and I pieced together a mobile application with a simple marketplace function. It featured an open chat room to guide users through recommendations, sales, and checkout.

The experiment had one goal: To understand if eCommerce could improve the viability of local, analog retail businesses. To do so, we targeted hard goods (not food products). We built atop Uber’s then-available pricing API and enabled independent retailers to market their products within our app and ship products as far as 20 miles outside of the city. Uber’s drivers delivered the goods to their homes.

To accomplish this, we indexed the goods of independent retailers and tracked inventory with a relatively light integration that relied on imported Quickbooks data. And then each product’s corresponding image was pulled into the app through .JSON web calls. Given that the vast majority of featured stores were within a mile of us, contractors were tasked with acquiring the goods and bringing them to a central location to stage for delivery by Uber. The last shipment left by the close of business and inventory was painstakingly updated upon the completion of each business day. In just under a year, the app sold $627,000 in top line sales at an average margin of around 17%.

That’s where the positives ended. The price of doing business with Uber was costly and the fleet of drivers was subpar, causing a number of customer service issues. The demand for hard goods was outpaced by the demand for perishable goods (food). And the area’s physical retail scene was a draw, so most consumers opted to walk, drive, or bike over instead. The app eventually amounted to an expensive experiment in between jobs.

The Difference: Now and Then

The experiment wasn’t a complete failure, however. By the time that we shut the application down, we’d developed a better understanding of the intersections between real estate, retail, technology, and the limitations of small businesses. I also learned an important lesson about eCommerce adoption: 2014 was far too early. Today, the former 7.7% share of retail (in 2014) sales has tripled. Nearly one of every four dollars is spent online in 2020.

Given that our focus was on non-coastal markets and second-tier cities, the marketplace helped us understand the needs of retailers outside of the country’s main retail hubs: Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, and so on. The app experience was nowhere near perfect, but the experiment was valuable. I went on to build DTC brands, founding 2PM Inc just a year later. That friend of mine became the founder of Loop Returns.

Fast forward and many of the retailers who once considered eCommerce a distraction have now invested heavily into building online retail as a primary channel. Consider Josh Quinn of Ohio’s Tiger Tree, a multi-million dollar independent retailer and former partner of our app experiment. Quinn recently shuttered Tiger Tree’s doors to pursue an eCommerce-first strategy. He said:

It’s an interesting example of just how fast retail has accelerated in six years. To say I don’t think my customers would have seen the utility in an on-demand delivery solution seems laughable now. But we could have been better positioned. We did so well as brick-and-mortar stores that it kept us from investing the way we should have. It hurts to think of where we’d be if we would have put the time into eCommerce back then.

Quinn is representative of a large swath of retailers who relied upon a brick-and-mortar business before the pandemic. But he won’t make the mistake again. He added: “We are in the middle of local online retail being a thing. Almost half of our eCommerce orders go to the Columbus, Ohio area.”

This is the new economy that DoorDash is primed to capture. The permanence of remote work culture and the restrictions placed on urban dining and nightlife has spawned three separate trends. There is a shift from major cities to smaller ones, urban flight to suburban “cities”, and housing to the all-encompassing homestead.

Sanitized urbanization removes the perceived risks of living in urban areas while adding the value of – what’s often – upgraded infrastructure, improved schools, and lower tax bases. [2PM, 1]

As remote work and distance learning continues to become more commonplace, entertainment, commerce, and utility will shift from physical to digital as well. There has been an extraordinary shift from thinking along the lines of office perks to thinking about optimizing the home. Consider Wayfair’s sudden shift of fortune. In 2017, the furniture reseller traded at a $5 billion market cap. Today it trades at nearly $26 billion, a growth emblematic of a boom in redesigning the home for modern needs: remote work, leisure, and comfort.

If this is any indication of how small business owners will react to these macroeconomic changes, we can expect second and third-order effects in the housing market to continue to materialize.

Inside The Home

Like Postmates, which has long tested hard goods marketplace capabilities, DoorDash’s opportunity lies with supporting the businesses of independent retailers by providing new opportunity for them. Not just by delivering the goods but by fostering a marketplace that expands their reach to wider, local audiences. By streamlining retailers as sources of goods and developing new initiatives to reach customers, their marketplace partners will be more inclined to view DoorDash as an effective customer acquisition engine.

A possible future as DoorDash embraces the shift to the homestead (and innovative demand-gen partnerships).

Success or failure will depend on growth beyond food delivery as the core model. This means that the development of efficient customer acquisition, fair and incentivized pay for its last-mile workforce, and paths to hyper growth in gross merchandising volume are key to the company’s long term viability. Consider this excerpt from a recent analysis on DoorDash:

That inability to change the business model is also likely to keep DoorDash from making any meaningful profit. Grubhub, the only US food delivery service on the stock market, recently complained that food delivery is not enough to build a sustainable and profitable business. [2]

By instituting a local marketplace model, DoorDash would encourage retailers like Quinn who find value in reaching more customers in their cities without relying upon the postal service for delivery. Quinn cited his frustration with existing local shipping models:

Independent retailers like us are facing something of a crisis with USPS shipments being delayed. Not that I am blaming them – I understand the strains on their system.

Amazon Prime has popularized next day and same day delivery. Services like HBO Max have begun to shift resources away from physical theaters and towards home-streaming models. And founded a year before our local commerce experiment, DoorDash is now trading at $55.6 billion. Like Jeff Bezos former marketplace of books, Tony Xu’s marketplace of local retailers is in its infancy. While intended for restaurants, the technology could easily be applied to retailers. And while DoorDash touts partnerships with large and sophisticated companies (Macy’s, etc), the delivery app’s real opportunity lies with locally-owned retailers who’d rely on DoorDash for the technical expertise and the audience to grow their businesses – a model that not even Shopify could compete with right now.

In its short existence, DoorDash has evolved well beyond just  delivery logistics, adding services like Storefront, which enables merchants to set up digital ordering directly from their native channels. [3]

We look at apps like DoorDash and see food delivery. Rather, view them as the last-mile enabler for businesses who are leaning into localized eCommerce. Food delivery, alone, will not justify the $50+ billion market cap but a city-by-city network of local retailers may. This is the eCommerce era now. Like every other retailer, DoorDash must learn to create new demand and service it with creative solutions. I suspect that the company’s reach will soon extend beyond your kitchen or your mobile phones. In the near future, the app may function more like a retail operating system.

Por Web Smith | Editor: Hilary Milnes | Arte: Alex Remy | About 2PM

Memorando: O mais inteligente da sala

Apophenia é uma palavra que há muito tempo considero uma das mais importantes da língua inglesa. Tanto um fenômeno normal quanto um fenômeno anormal, dependendo da acuidade mental de cada um, sua conotação é complexa. É a capacidade de encontrar conexões significativas entre ideias não relacionadas. As ideias e a comunidade são o combustível desse fenômeno.

O papel da Apophenia na história é subestimado. A Era do Iluminismo impulsionou a humanidade de forma notável. No centro desse período estava a invenção da cafeteria europeia. Com a cafeína dos produtos importados e sem o entorpecimento dos álcoois da era renascentista, as ideias acadêmicas e sociais tomaram forma em salas dominadas por homens que falavam com poder e obediência, como se essa fosse sua única contribuição para a sociedade.

A cafeteria europeia, ou a "penny university", democratizou a síntese de informações de uma forma que antes era exclusiva das universidades. Ela promoveu conversas, debates e autoria entre participantes ativos e ouvintes intrometidos. As ideias eram valiosas. Imagine um navio com um pequeno vazamento perto da proa. Somente uma tábua de madeira fortificada pode proporcionar a estabilidade de que o navio precisa para suportar os testes e os rigores do mar. Assim como as tábuas endurecidas de madeira dignas do mar, as ideias da era do Iluminismo tapavam os cascos dos navios construídos por outros. A ideia de uma pessoa completava a de outra. Raramente era a pessoa mais inteligente da sala que recebia o crédito final pela criação final. Mas se você ficasse naquela cafeteria por tempo suficiente, provavelmente sairia com uma criação própria.

Em teoria, os fóruns digitais são as cafeterias desta era. As revelações encontradas nas "penny universities" da Londres do século XVIII são hoje comunidades digitais de conhecimento compartilhado. Em The Social Architecture of Impactful Communities (A arquitetura social das comunidades impactantes), de Nick deWilde, ele explica:

As pessoas normalmente "contratam" comunidades para realizar transições que exigem conexão humana. Um fundador de startup que deseja se tornar um líder melhor se inscreve na Leaders in Tech para obter o tipo de feedback honesto necessário para o crescimento profissional.

Em parte, é por isso que as ideias são valiosas: elas podem servir à função de comunidade. As ideias podem se solidificar em uma massa sólida, capaz de manter outro navio à tona. No entanto, há uma infinidade de ensaios escritos ancorados na ideia de que "as ideias não importam". Esses sábios escritores explicam que, se você não puder executar essas ideias, suas palavras ou pensamentos não terão valor. Esses autores defendem o valor da execução. Não se engane, a cultura do hustle foi na mesma onda. Portanto, eu discordo.

Considere o falecido paleontólogo, biólogo e historiador da ciência americano Stephen Gould:

Meu talento é fazer conexões. É por isso que sou um ensaísta. É também por isso que meu trabalho técnico é estruturado da maneira que é. Como as partes da concha de um caracol interagem? Quais são as taxas de crescimento? Você consegue ver um padrão? Estou sempre tentando ver um padrão nesta floresta e fico feliz por poder fazer isso. (...) Posso me sentar sobre qualquer assunto e pensar em cerca de 20 coisas que se relacionam a ele, e não são conexões bobas.

Gould levou anos para perceber que isso era uma habilidade. Às vezes, as pessoas mais inteligentes da sala são aquelas que pensam em problemas sociais, deficiências do setor ou inovações revolucionárias. Essas ideias chegam aos principais veículos de notícias, a grandes feeds do Twitter ou a especialistas do setor que repetem frases de efeito com pouca necessidade de citar onde as ouviram. E, por causa dessas ideias, os veículos de notícias ganham mais cliques, o número de seguidores no Twitter aumenta e os especialistas do setor recebem uma compensação por suas aparições. Então, por que alguns idealizadores precisam executar para provar seu valor, enquanto outros ganham valor percebido simplesmente por terem encontrado um público?

A capacidade de aproveitar ideias e transformá-las em invenções, infraestrutura, produtos ou arte é uma habilidade rara que deve ser valorizada. Isso é certo. Mas a oportunidade de fazer isso nem sempre é distribuída de forma homogênea. Muitos dos melhores pensadores são construtores em seus próprios direitos, mas por uma infinidade de razões, suas ideias nem sempre são atribuídas a eles.

O meio de comunicação da época desempenha um papel considerável na forma como as ideias são atribuídas.

Os gregos mais notáveis eram oradores. Os líderes da era colonial americana escreveram tratados e cartas volumosos. Alexander Hamilton, um dos criadores mais prolíficos da história, escreveu 85 artigos e ensaios entre 1788 e 1789. O início dos anos 1900 assistiu ao surgimento do rádio. Franklin D. Roosevelt transcendeu o poder dos discursos feitos pela maioria dos presidentes anteriores ao usar o rádio para instruir e inspirar os americanos. Na década de 1960, a televisão assumiu o centro do palco. Um belo John F. Kennedy dominou um debate televisionado, enquanto Richard Nixon foi o vencedor para a maioria dos que estavam sintonizados na transmissão de rádio.

A Internet foi pioneira em um novo tipo de líder de pensamento no início dos anos 2000. Hoje, estamos no meio da ascensão da mídia baseada em texto, seja por meio do Twitter ou de boletins informativos. Os mesmos métodos que antes prosperavam nas cafeterias da Europa continuam vivos em plataformas como Reddit, Twitter, Substack, Slack e fóruns privados.

Com o intuito de destacar os mais inteligentes da sala, aqui estão alguns líderes empresariais, executivos e consultores do ecossistema 2PM que têm as ideias que fazem os setores avançarem.

Quando Naj Austin apostou no Ethel's Club em 2018, ela deveria ter conseguido arrecadar dinheiro com facilidade com base na ideia de que os marginalizados mereciam um lugar voltado para a comunidade para se reunir. Naquele mesmo ano, o The Wing arrecadou US$ 117 milhões para expandir seus serviços para seu grupo demográfico principal, enquanto Austin estava basicamente se esforçando para desenvolver sua coleção de ideias.

O que mais me impressionou em Austin foi sua capacidade de mudar para serviços digitais para a comunidade do Ethel's Club quando a pandemia começou a perturbar as empresas físicas de varejo, como a dela e a The Wing, no início de 2020. A agilidade de Austin rendeu dividendos e ela agora está levantando fundos para seu próximo empreendimento, a Somewhere Good.

Você pode acompanhar as ideias de Naj no Twitter.

Antes de Brittany Chavez ter uma plataforma de comércio eletrônico sustentável para criar seu mercado, ela já havia aproveitado sua ideia de um recurso para sua comunidade "Shop Latinx" e criado um público em torno dela com seu cofundador Miles Montes. Sua conta no Instagram alcançou mais de 60.000 fãs e clientes do que a mídia chama de "Etsy para latinos". Halie LeSavage, da Morning Brew, explicou por que seu empreendimento apoiado pela Techstars poderia dar certo:

Como 2020 continua nos lembrando, a Geração Z e a geração do milênio são inflexíveis quanto a comprar seus valores. E os compradores latinos são um poderoso grupo de consumidores: Eles movimentarão mais de US$ 1,9 trilhão em gastos nos EUA até 2023, de acordo com a Nielsen. [2]

Se há algo que aprendi sobre Chavez, é que ela é resiliente, não para até que suas ideias tomem forma, acolhe as ideias dos outros e dá o crédito a quem merece. Seu grupo de mais de 60.000 consumidores e fãs concordam.

Você pode acompanhar as ideias de Brittany no Twitter (e aqui até que o Twitter conserte sua conta original).

Conheci Sherrell na Associação Nacional de Jornalistas Negros em Miami, Flórida, em 2018. Sentados com Dan Runcie, da Trapital, cada um de nós explicou nossas ideias e o que esperávamos para nossas empresas de mídia independentes para uma pequena sala de participantes. Na época, seu mais recente empreendimento, The Plug, estava em sua infância. Hoje, ele é um dos recursos do setor mais dependentes da tecnologia. Considere este relatório do Seattle Times de agosto de 2020.

Ela não imaginava que seu boletim informativo se tornaria um negócio de mídia por si só, mas o The Plug - cujo nome vem de um termo coloquial para alguém que conhece todo mundo e "tem acesso a tudo", diz Dorsey - decolou.

Ela obteve um mestrado em jornalismo de dados pela Escola de Pós-Graduação em Jornalismo da Universidade de Columbia, concentrando-se em como os dados podem ajudar a "contar histórias melhores sobre grupos sub-representados na tecnologia", diz Dorsey, explicando sua tese. [3]

Sherrell está construindo uma das empresas mais importantes em recursos humanos. E, embora todas as empresas de tecnologia agora queiram contratá-la por causa de sua ideia que se transformou em criação, suspeito que ela terá mais impacto de forma independente.

Você pode acompanhar as ideias de Sherrell no Twitter.

Responsável pelo lançamento da divisão de conteúdo lucrativo na famosa agência de relações públicas Derris, Grace Garcia Clarke é uma das pensadoras mais curiosas e livres no espaço de interseção entre agência e mídia. Nossa primeira interação foi um debate em dezembro de 2019 na comunidade Lean Luxe de Paul Munford sobre os méritos do anúncio fracassado da Peloton e o que isso significaria para a sorte da empresa.

Anteriormente uma agente da Derris, ela agora é independente e altamente cobiçada. As marcas a utilizam para comunicações, pesquisas do setor e seu olho para entender o que os homens de negócios não entendem. Um exemplo disso é sua análise bem pesquisada de produtos para a revista The Strategist, da New York Magazine, em que ela reuniu as opiniões de dezenas de usuários da Geração Z do TikTok para publicar um dos artigos de maior conversão da publicação.

Não há produtos que vendam mais rápido no TikTok do que os produtos de beleza, seja um kit de laminação de sobrancelhas faça você mesmo, um pó de barbear masculino ou um gel de banho que custa exatamente US$ 1. E como o aplicativo é dominado por adolescentes, muitos desses produtos são fáceis de usar (ou de pagar). Para descobrir o que faz jus à fama, passamos horas trocando centenas de mensagens diretas com influenciadores do TikTok. [4]

Quando lhe é dada autonomia para tomar decisões para as empresas com as quais ela faz parceria, elas se beneficiam. Eu deveria saber; ela é uma colaboradora frequente da 2PM.

Você pode acompanhar as ideias de Grace no Twitter.

Andrea Hernández é um oráculo dos bens de consumo embalados. Seu trabalho com o Snaxshot é fruto de uma ideia que ela tem há muito tempo: uma editorialização dos dados por trás das tendências de alimentos e CPG. Natural de San Pedro Sula, Cortés, Honduras, observei seu público em torno do Snaxshot começar a transcender seu nicho. Hernández também é a fundadora da Mood Food Snacks, portanto, ela tem uma visão aguçada do mercado mais amplo. Um relatório recente da Morning Brew apresentou suas ideias sobre CPG e distribuição durante a pandemia e depois dela:

Veremos o surgimento de "lojas obscuras", como a Amazon, que recentemente lançou seu primeiro Whole Foods somente on-line no Brooklyn, que se concentrará apenas no atendimento de pedidos de supermercado feitos on-line, e a DoorDash, que lançou o DashMart. [5]

Quando ela escreve sobre CPG, eu ouço. Suas ideias têm sido incrivelmente valiosas e a Snaxshot crescerá por causa delas.

Você pode acompanhar as ideias de Andrea no Twitter.

Essa lista poderia continuar. A ideia de ideias é mal compreendida. Enquanto os maiores públicos do início da era da Internet eram os vencedores com os espólios, a era dos boletins informativos está trazendo à tona novas ideias no centro. A convenção da correspondência de padrões está lentamente cedendo lugar ao mérito do pensador.

É claro que ideias excelentes e monetizáveis ainda são filtradas e apresentadas por fontes tradicionais. A CNBC, a Vogue e o LA Times continuarão a receber o crédito pelo trabalho de públicos menores. Mas, se há uma coisa que notei, é que esta era começou a encurtar a distância entre os criadores de pensamentos interessantes e os grandes públicos que querem ouvi-los.

Dessa forma, as ideias nunca foram tão valiosas, porque não se pensa mais que sejam binárias - nunca foram. Não existem idealizadores e executores. Em vez disso, as ideias existem em um espectro em que pensamentos novos podem levar a oportunidades. Esses ativos intangíveis são uma moeda, agora mais do que nunca. E está na hora de começarmos a reconhecer os mais inteligentes da sala enquanto eles ainda estão se movendo. Não será por muito tempo.

Por Web Smith | Editor: Hilary Milnes | Arte: Alex Remy | About 2PM