No. 275: YouTube goes commerce

facebook-ad copy 2
Pictured: YouTube sensation “Lucas the Spider”

YouTube creators have been frustrated with the platform’s ad operations, as of late. YouTube legend and videographer Casey Niestat has nearly 10 million YouTube subscribers, the embattled Pewdiepie has 64 million, the famed MKBHD has 6.5 million, and Logan Paul has nearly 18 million (and an eight figure online store). In addition to the proceeds driven by advertising to an audience of those respective magnitudes, creators have been increasingly reliant upon merchandising for a steady stream of revenue. In a flash, a YouTube creator showed the world just how powerful an online retail operation can be for creators.

Joshua Slice is a former Disney employee and, currently, the creator and animator of the Lucas the Spider YouTube phenomenon. With a relatively smaller community of 2.4 million YouTube subscribers, the first 18 days of his embedded store achieved an astounding open. The creator of Lucas the Spider, launched a Kickstarter-esque campaign on Teespring (in addition to a full store). The plushie product sold around 60,000 units, netting Joshua $1 million in profit in just 18 days. This 60,000 unit tally was one of twenty available SKUs.

Lucas-The-Spider
Teespring’s integration provides in-line eCommerce for creators

In June 5’s Member Brief No. 16: Patreon’s Signal, our research led me to the following conclusion:

We believe that Patreon’s acquisition of Kit signals a potential uptick in M&A and partnership activity throughout the creator space. Kickstarter acquired Drip in March of 2016 and will likely pursue a merchandising solution for its stable of creators to mirror Patreon. YouTube is positioning its platform to compete with Patreon, Instagram, and Shopify, as well.

According to Tech Crunch’s June 5, 2018 article:

The deal also could help Patreon stay ahead of YouTube and Facebook, which are encroaching on its subscription patronage model. Patreon now has 2 million patrons backing 100,000 creators. It paid out $350 million over its first five years through 2017, and expects to send creators another $300 million in 2018, while taking a 5 percent cut.

Twenty days later and revisiting the Member Brief seems a bit prescient. With the newly announced partnership between YouTube and Teespring, Patreon’s most recent move is already behind the curve. The acquisition of Kit didn’t move Patreon any closer to shipping merchandise for its over 100,000 partners.

Patreon is well-positioned to be the leader in one-stop-shops of monetization for content creators. Kit can be a transformative partner for them, intensifying YouTube and other creator networks’ need to bolster their revenue operations. Commerce will become an increasingly important platform tool in a race to stay competitive for top creators. Activity over the next six to twelve months will determine which creator networks seek out the services of the aforementioned merchandising logistics companies: through partnership, by way of a joint venture, or through an out-right acquisition.

Member Brief No. 16: Patreon’s Signal

Prior to this eCommerce rollout, YouTube recently launched the same type of membership service that Patreon offers its creators. What does this mean for creator-based platforms? Patreon’s M&A signaled a period of consolidation and will continue to lead to the siloing of services for top creators. According to Byron Jones of the Music Network, “During the tests, Teespring reported an 82% success rate for YouTube users and an average 25% rise in item sales for each.”

Track the growing merch database

The initial numbers are gaudy and Teespring’s PR has been persistent. Their recent success has sent ripples across the industry. And to be fair, it was an enormous win for them because newer YouTube creators will now be incentivized to remain loyal to YouTube’s offerings.  It’s more than likely that some of YouTube’s creators will consider shifting from other storefronts to YouTube’s Teespring offering. It’s even possible that creators like Logan Paul (who has a sophisticated eCommerce operation in place) will consider testing inline retail on their YouTube channels.

But this partnership is clearly a shot across the bow for Instagram and Patreon. While Instagram is all-in on Shopify’s seamless integration and growing into YouTube’s space, Patreon is still in need of a merchandising partner and an exclusive creative partner that can help them in the short term. Consolidation will continue.

Read more of the issue here.

By Web Smith and Meghan Terwilliger | About 2PM

No. 274: Merch has become fashion

facebook-ad copy 4
Cofounders of Everybody.World

The word merch is synonymous with throwaway. Or at least it used to be. In 2PM’s leading story, Quartzy discusses the changing demographics that have influenced the types of products that luxury brands sell. Gone are the days when famed fashion houses like Gucci focus solely on traditional luxury fashion. Today, their products reflect an affinity for sweat pants, tennis shoes, and modern t-shirt patterns.

This has trickled on down to the merchandise industry. Younger millennials and Gen Z’ers wear merch as a fashion statement and luxury has adopted this burgeoning trend. For merch providers, this means that the American Apparel / LA Apparel aesthetic has given way to something new patterns, styles, and definitions of inclusivity.

2PM recently took a deep dive into the types of merchandising campaigns that are moving the concept of merch away from throwaway and towards luxury. In this archived brief, we explored everything from platforms used to preferred t-shirt patterns and blanks.

Member Brief No. 11: Mega Merch 101

Social media and the normalization of digitally vertical native brands have enabled artists and influencers to create online retail brands as a primary source of revenue. In this report, we will break down best practices – including some insights from our editor’s work with a certain Youtube creator.

Bain Capital released a 2017 report on global luxury that emphasized this shift driven by millennial consumers. Here is an important excerpt:


The Millennial State of Mind: Success in the next decade requires brands to refocus on their customers to better anticipate and cater to their needs. The younger generation will be key as millennials and Gen Z will represent 45 percent of the global personal luxury goods market by 2025. Still, when analysing behaviours, it is more correct to talk about a “millennial state of mind,” which is increasingly permeating across all generations and is thus more a psychographic phenomenon rather than a purely demographic one.

Read the rest here.


To summarize Bain Capital, the Gen Z interpretation of luxury fashion has permeated throughout the entire industry. This has affected consumer industry across footwear, accessories, and apparel. There are merch providers that are well-positioned here.

Business of Fashion’s wrote a recent feature on the two founders of Everybody.World. The write up did a masterful job of explaining how one merch provider built a direct-to-consumer brand that fueled their high growth wholesale business. By working with a curated selection that represents the zeitgeist. This includes: style contributors, graphic designers, a well-designed basics line, and the one staple that has become the go-to for festival merchandisers.

Quality, too, has become increasingly important as concert merch has evolved from souvenir to fashion statement, underscored by merch-like pieces released by luxury brands including Gucci, Balenciaga and Vetements. “The demand is absolutely higher than when I started doing this six years ago,” said Allen, who sourced roughly 70,000 pieces of merch for 2018’s Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival. “And the expectations for the product itself are definitely higher.”

That’s why, this year, Allen looked beyond the typical “blank” T-shirt companies — think Gildan, Bella Canvas and Hanes — to boost Coachella’s offering.

Read more here (unlocked)

Cofounders Iris Alonzo and Carolina Crespo have done an extraordinary job of positioning the Everybody.World brand by building a strong direct-to-consumer business. Something that LA Apparel head Dov Charney is having problems with, this second time around. Due to the successes that they’ve had with wholesaling their famed ‘trash tee’ for $2.90/unit, wholesale traction has allowed the two founders to grow a substantial, higher-margin, direct-to-consumer business. Their main vehicle has been zeitgeist-driven basis and unexpected collaborations with contributors (even Virgil Abloh is listed on the site).

In Q2, merchandise drops have grown to become a major part of the creator narrative. Beyonce’s Coachella performance and her subsequent eCommerce drop was studied in Member Brief No. 11. And above, you’ll see high profile merchandise drops to include: Kanye West, Kid Cudi, and Nas.

As creators continue to emphasize merchandising as an extension of their art (and business), it’s imperative for providers to observe the shifts in the meaning of luxury and how Gen Z consumers have begun to shape the merchandise-turn-fashion industry. For the time being, tees are no longer a dress-down device. And it’s not just about what’s on the shirt, these days. Patterns and fit matter more than ever.

Blanks are no longer viewed as commodity products to a growing segment of American buyers. In fact, the industry is supplying a key component of Gen Z’s fashion identity. There are several providers that are well positioned to grow with the youngest of American consumers.

Read more of the issue here.

By Web Smith | About 2PM

Editor’s note: the next 2PM database (releasing 6/21) will include the most notable of merchandising providers to include Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania’s “Blank” run by Michelle Sharp. This will be a growing database. Join the executive membership for access. 

No. 273: Modern Luxe Doesn’t Bend

Watermark_ByTailorBrands
Pictured: Outdoor Voices, from our Open Letter to DNVB CEOs

In November of 2016, Lean Luxe’s Paul Munford penned somewhat of a scripture to upstart modern luxury brands: promotion-heavy retailers will not last. There are few takeaways from “The Downward Spiral” that are worth mentioning as recent economic reports suggest that the retail apocalypse is coming to an end, a great sign for aspirational DNVBs that are looking to expand into physical retail.

Screen Shot 2018-06-12 at 10.05.48 AM.png

We are in a time of unprecedented retail brand launches, collaborations, acquisitions, and re-imaginations – much of which is online-first. This begs the question, what will separate the winners from the commodities? There are early and permanent decisions that determine a brand’s trajectory. For every Mizzen + Main or Ministry of Supply, there is a State and Liberty. For every Outdoor Voices, there is a Bandier. And for every Away, there is a Raden. Each decision matters. And no decision matters more than pricing and a brand’s promotional tendencies.

Here are the top ten takeaways from some of Munford’s best work:

  • No maneuver in retail appears to be as easy to roll out, yet no strategy is as detrimental to a retailer’s long term prospects as the heavy discount. It is a palliative pill: wonderful for the consumer in the short run, but ultimately bad for both business and shoppers over time. It commoditizes the brand, forcing companies to differentiate on price. 
  • The second problem, also related to scale, is systemic to the industry itself: The need to constantly add more and more products at regular intervals, flooding the marketplace with goods that are newer, but rarely better.
  • The lure of the discount, then, becomes too hard to resist. It provides a short term boost to the bottom line and the illusion of growth, but at the expense of brand reputation and sustainable profit — two vital arteries for a business’s overall health.
  • Modern luxury companies have figured out the formula, and it’s remarkably simple: create less merchandise than will sell (and predict, if possible, the sell-through rate, with pre-orders), keep demand high. Embrace the waiting list, as Everlane, Glossier, Caraa, and Alala, among others, often do. 
  • Never discount; preserve the standing of the brand. These tactics certainly do not work, however, or at least for very long, if product standards are below par.
  • Hermes, for instance, is notorious for never slashing prices. Its products carry a prestige because of that, and there is always a demand, no matter how frivolous the item. And they certainly are not above testing the limits of consumer devotion: It has even gone so far as to repackage its cutting floor leather scraps to sell them as high-priced gift boxes.
  • That opposition to discounting would come from founders within the emerging modern luxury industry is no coincidence. For one, it displays the trademark sense of calm confidence in the product that this group is quickly becoming known for. 
  • As for Mr. Preysman, the full price mantra feeds into his mission to constantly refine the product, to make it better, and push it ever closer to perfection according to the standards of the brand.
  • Surprisingly, rejecting the discount is also quite consumer-centric. The eternally-wise Ben Franklin said it best, of course, when he offered this observation: “The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.”
  • It takes superb maturity and a great deal of resilience to fight the urge for the temporary discount boost at the expense of preserving a long term reputation. 

Maturity, patience, grit, and perhaps temporary poverty are keys to developing the types of brands that grow to compete with age old legends and fierce (but hopefully friendly) rivals. In 2013, Brooks Brothers commented on Mizzen + Main’s influence on the shirting industry for the New York Times:

While Brooks Brothers experimented with “performance” shirts akin to Mizzen & Main’s, [Brooks Brothers’ spokesman] Mr. Blee said that customers preferred the general wearability of conventional all-cotton. The stretch fibers felt synthetic to them. Although a range of Brooks Brothers oxford shirts have moisture-wicking properties, he said, “We are known as a natural-fiber house: 100 percent cotton, 100 percent cashmere.

Just five years later, Brooks Brothers is launching a competitor to compete in a menswear world that is being re-defined by technical fabrics and other innovations.

Mizzen+Main on Twitter

we’re old enough to remember when Brooks Brothers laughed at performance menswear: https://t.co/5hBzcUHAEx https://t.co/xCN29dVk81

I remember the joy of that article hitting the newsstands on December 18, 2013. Not because of the notoriety that it would provide but because it had been over a year and half and we really needed the sales. We stood firm on our price while we built allegiances and Kevin worked feverishly to improve the product. And the company lasted. What Lavelle and team has done today is nothing short of spectacular. And it has allowed the brand to stand, eye to eye, in the same clubs and on the same courses as the company that invented the polo shirt (sorry, Ralph).

To achieve growth and longevity, branding cannot be viewed as a soft skill. Price cannot be viewed as an arbitrary number to manipulate. The five forces must always be considered. And patience must be paramount because great brands start slowly. In the age of modern luxury DNVB’s this is as important as the products themselves.

Read more: An Open Letter to DNVB CEOs (Issue No. 254)

Read the rest of Issue No. 273 here.

By Web Smith and Meghan Terwilliger | About 2PM