No. 278: How Digital Industries Intersect

facebook-ad copy 2

Simply put, a polymath is a person who is devoted to learning a lot about a broad range of subjects. In other words, a person of great and varied learning. For readers of this letter, the curated and editorialized subjects have been both broad and useful.

This project kicked off with letter No. 1 to polymaths (2PM). It was delivered in the afternoon of March 22, 2016. Nearly two and a half years and 300 letters later (278 Issues, 22 Member Briefs), this publication has amassed a readership of operators across a host of trades: publishing, eCommerce, branding, software development, manufacturing, data science, commercial real estate, advertising, logistics, creation, and retail. They look for actionable information and 2PM is often their source.

2PM is my go-to source every day for the most relevant and timely developments in brand side eCommerce along with understanding adjacent industries and how they all interact. Whether it is unique insight into DNVB’s, analysis on the latest moves by industry giants, or the latest changes in traditional or digital advertising, 2PM covers it.

Kevin Lavelle, Founder and CEO of Mizzen + Main

Over the last 300 letters, 2PM tracked momentum and deceleration across several industries. The goal: collect enough data to formulate worthwhile and actionable insights.

One common thread that 2PM’s loyal subscribers share: understanding that there is much to gain by learning from others. By studying a group of industries, you’ll begin to recognize previously unseen interconnectedness. It was Tim Ferriss who once quipped, “it’s the big-picture generalists who will predict, innovate, and rise to power.”

Modern capitalism has historically rewarded specialists. Our economy does not run without some degree of specialization. But when you consider the developments of late, it’s easy to understand the value of learning from adjacent industries. As industries interact and converge, being able to understand the big picture is table stakes. Being able to execute on a cross-section of knowledge is a pre-requisite for thriving in today’s digital economy.

It’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. I think you can be a jack-of-all-trades and a mistress-of-all-trades. If you study it, and you put reasonable intelligence and reasonable energy, reasonable electricity to it, you can do that. You may not become Max Roach on the drums. But you can learn the drums.

Maya Angelou

In every letter, eCommerce is the primary focus. And there is tremendous amount of care placed into every letter that we publish. Every article is vetted to assure objectivity or reasonable opinion. Articles written by self-promoters or network contributors are often set aside for reads that have greater value. They’re collected by way of our own search processes and from sources that are both free and paid. From start to finish, you’re on the receiving end of about ten hours of work per letter.

And for good reason. These industries are affecting most every aspect of our global economy. Nearly every industry is being impacted by principles of traditional online retail adoption. Here are a handful of events, trends, or industry shifts that have occurred in the last two years:

  • Publishing. Many digital publishers are hiring a director of eCommerce and staffing up to grow direct-to consumer retail as a core competency.
  • eCommerce brands. Traditional eCommerce companies set aside traditional advertising to seek partnerships with highly visible creators or influencers. These two groups often mimic the demand generation effects of organic press mentions.
  • Retail real estate. Urban commercial real estate vacancies continue to rise as eCommerce brands and marketplaces gain influence.
  • Retail real estate. WeWork move has begun to experiment with physical retail. And dozens of startups have begun building businesses by subleasing short-term spaces to emerging vertical brands.
  • Media. The most viable major publishers have the highest commerce influence (New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Economist). It’s no longer “eyes” that publishers want, it’s the ability to influence the sale that moves the needle for them. Look no further than the NYT’s acquisition of Wirecutter.
  • Media. Subscription-driven publishers spend as much time as traditional retailers focusing on conversion rate optimization (CRO), customer acquisition cost (CAC), and lifetime value (LTV).
  • eCommerce. For better or for worse, the most talked about car company in America does the majority of its business online.
  • Media. Facebook and Google advertising efficacy continues to drop for brands, as CAC continues to rise. Logistics companies step in to develop new forms of advertising (data-driven direct mail).
  • Media. Youtube Creators drive business to platforms like Patreon (eCommerce) or develop merchandising operations that can often amass eight figures in top line revenue.
  • eCommerce. Heritage retail brands like Nike have forgone traditional, physical retail to focus on data-driven direct to consumer retail.
  • Retail real estate. As eCommerce has gained footing in American cities, middle class malls have begun to shutter, negatively affecting housing prices in nearby areas.
  • eCommerce. Amazon has become more than an eCommerce marketplace, it’s an entire economy affecting everything from: logistics, entertainment, healthcare, grocery shopping, fashion, brick and mortar retail, and data center expansion.
  • eCommerce. Walmart has continued to move up market after several acquisitions and a refocused effort on millennial moms.
  • logistics. Urban apartment and condominiums are leaning on Amazon to address the influx shipments.

We encourage you to search the archives by clicking the most mentioned companies. You’ll be taken to a page that has the link to the archived email at the bottom of the page. There you’ll find the story that pertains to the company that you’re studying.  Or search the editorial library with the search bar, over 300,000 words have been written across several industries. And in the near future, we are looking at smart ways for the industry leaders who read 2PM to connect in meaningful ways. Until then, we’ll keep rising above the noise.

By Web Smith | About 2PM

Member Brief No. 21: Emerging Apparel Category Report

facebook-ad
Pictured: Primary Cloth

In 2017, the online apparel market amassed a $100 billion dollar year for the first time in history. Consumers have grown accustomed to making these types of purchases without the need to touch, try, or toil with their buying decisions. In this report, we break down two subcategories of the online apparel market. They share one thing in common: each category has been disrupted in the past two years and in both cases, there’s more to come. These two subcategories stood out for areas that have the most potential for growth in 2019 and beyond:

  • plus size
  • children’s apparel

Plus sizing, alas!

The plus size subcategory is ripe for disruption with new players joining the fold by the month. It’s no longer novel to offer sizing up to 5x. In fact, consumers are beginning to see brands focus on providing real fashion options to more Americans. While Columbus’ Lane Bryant (sales growth of 18.1% in 2017) has been around for nearly 120 years, it’s never been viewed as a fashion forward or technically-savvy company. And Ashley Stewart Inc. (sales growth of 26.7% in 2017) also began as a physical-first retailer in 1991. Both brands have suffered at the hands of private equity’s influx of cash and unfriendly voting control. But private equity is not solely to blame. And both are desperately pivoting to a retail world that is more welcoming to digitally native vertical players.

This member brief is designed exclusively for Executive Members, to make membership easy, you can click below and gain access to hundreds of reports, our DTC Power List, and other tools to help you make high level decisions.

Join Here

Memo: The Power of the 100

 

JjVRE0H5.jpgWe were on a bike ride from one end of the island to the other, just a few weeks back. It was the four of us on our way back from lunch by a small airfield: my wife, two great friends, and me. This wasn’t the joyous kind of ride where you’d find yourself looking at the sights and soaking up beautiful architecture (at least not for me). This ride had one purpose: travel a nine-mile trail in an efficient way.

Just this past week, I realized I’d had a glaring error in my thinking on that ride home. And this nine-mile, 34-minute trek perfectly demonstrated it. It was actually my wife who helped me to understand what I could have done better in that moment. I asked her for permission to use her criticism of me for this post. She quickly obliged.

Every great business is built around a secret that’s hidden from the outside. A great company is a conspiracy to change the world; when you share your secret, the recipient becomes a fellow conspirator. [1]

I’m impatient. I seek speed and efficiency to a fault. About a mile into our ride home, I noticed an unconventional path. And frankly, I just wanted to get back to our rented home in Oak Bluffs. I wanted to move on to more exciting plans. Path “A” was conventional and well worn; it’s how we got there. Path “B” was new and improved; let’s call it product xProduct x was riskier, faster, and more picturesque. As we cycled home at 9 – 10 mph, I looked back at the crew and pointed to product x. In a moment, I tried to sell it, but they didn’t immediately see the value in it. They leaned towards the incumbent product, path “A”. I observed their hesitance, I scoffed, and I took off on my own. The path allowed for higher speeds, less traffic, and fewer gusts of ocean wind.

In short, I didn’t sell them; I didn’t win them over. And because of this, they didn’t join me on the journey. But more importantly, they weren’t able to tell others about the picturesque, faster, newer product x. Founders who launch products in media, software, or commerce often run into the same conundrum. A product that doesn’t sell on its own isn’t a good product. But to move a product into the “sells on its own” category, you need to earn that slow and grueling first 100.

Without a strong group of early adopters, you will not efficiently achieve the attention of the masses. The first 100 are the foundation. Without the support of the 100, the masses will not adopt. Made famous by Simon Sinek, heed the diffusion of innovation theory: the early majority will not try something until someone else tries it first. Brands are judged by this early majority.

Jason Lemkin is a widely known investor and tactician in the SaaS space. He has his understanding of SaaS growth down to a science. He knows how to evaluate products based upon their customer acquisition efficiency and revenue trajectory. I loosely apply some of his beliefs to retail because the core message is essentially the same.

No Title

You’ll have brand equity probably as early as $1m in ARR. As soon as you have 100 happy customers or so.Protect it zealously. In the end, it’s how most non-early adopters choose which apps to use and buy.

The Law of the 100 is everything, whether you’re building a service or a retail brand. Have you ever heard a music fan cite Beyoncé’s Beyhive? Without the strength of an impassioned audience (a hive), brands are left to the devices of phase two or three tactics throughout the phase zero period of growth. Impassioned audiences matter.

  • Phase zero: collect interest
  • Phase one: build word of mouth influence
  • Phase two: utilize paid channels
  • Phase three: consider paid endorsers; tip into the mainstream

Another quote from Zero to One stands out when I consider brand equity discussions: If your product requires advertising or salespeople to sell it, it’s not good enough: technology is primarily about product development, not distribution. So how do we overcome this hurdle while short on time, cash, and temper?

Consider something that you’ll read throughout 2PM. If you’ve built a great product, you’ll need an audience. And if you’ve built a captive audience, you’ll need a great product. The most efficient way to build the audience is before you launch the product. But that luxury doesn’t always exist. For product marketing veterans, harnessing brand evangelism is a part of the post-launch process. Word-of-mouth influence is what drives growth as long as consumers observe authenticity in the message.

By building a community of impassioned believers, they spread a brand’s messages without you ever spending a dime on Instagram, Facebook, or Google. This means that relationships are often 1:1 in the beginning. Brands often try to sell one single member of the potential 100 at a time. Whereas marketing is typically seen as a funnel, building the first 100 looks more like a handshake line.


From Issue No. 268: The Billions Effect

Last week, Brooklyn’s Greats Brand released an ultra-limited edition Axelrod shoe; 100 pairs of the premium Italian-suede sneaker sold out in under 17 minutes.


To achieve this type of sales velocity, brands must be trusted. But they also have to take demand generation and word-of-mouth marketing very seriously. The Greats Brand did a great job of this with their recent product release:

  • Secured a popular niche media collaboration.
  • Barely tweaked an existing product to appeal to an established audience.
  • Earned media placements after the collaboration announcement.
  • Surveyed established audience, just 48 hours before the product hit their online store.
  • Collected thousands of phone numbers for hyper-efficient, targeted text marketing. This is 1:1 communication at scale.
  • Texted numbers. Counted a short wave of product page conversions.

A barely-tweaked product garnered over $200,000 in earned media for Greats Brand and the product sold out in 17 minutes. Successful commerce companies and vertical brands generate an authentic happiness and sense of community with their customers. A common retail error occurs when product founders focus on the validity of their products alone.

A product is a journey. An early customer is not just a buyer, they are part of that journey. In Zero to One, the author communicates: an early customer is a secret holder in your product’s conspiracy to change the world. Remember the cycling allegory? My critical failure occurred when I assumed that the product alone (the new path, speed) was more important than the friends and family who were with me (the happy 100 customers). I was impatient, and to me, product alone was more valuable than the collective.


CASE: ATOMS

Screen Shot 2018-07-11 at 11.18.34 AM
The Atoms x Product Hunt integration

When DNVB No. 118 popped up my radar in January 2018, it became very clear that Atoms understood the power of 100 principles for vertical brands. The D2C shoe brand (still in pre-launch) initially kicked off with the help of Product Hunt. Through a short survey, Atoms places you into a queue of now more than 9,400 potential buyers. In the first month, if even 1/3 of the waitlisted consumers buy the shoes upon their release, Atoms will gross $500,000. Their current upside potential? Close to $2 million in revenue on day one.

Atoms now has the opportunity to convert these early adopters (who are paying full price) into evangelists who will find the young company their next 10,000 believers. And all of this on just $560,000 in seed funding.

Will Atoms outlast the early hype cycle? Potentially. They do have their detractors. But few physical product brands are as well-positioned to generate critical early revenue.


For products primed to grow without paid channels, speed must take a back seat to a type of validity that is only gained by amassing a passionate, vocal, and protective 100. The best brand managers would have done what I did not, in that moment: (1) convince the cyclists to join the journey of product x, (2) let them lead the ride, and then (3) watch as the collective attracts more to the team.

By Web Smith | About 2PM