备忘录巨大的鸿沟

War Games, continued. We often believe a partisan divide to be a purely American phenomenon, but there may be no greater example of the volatile intersection of politics and global economics than the state of trade policy of China and the United States. Perhaps it’s always been this way. But this new competitive precedent has been established upon new ground.

In 1979, the US and China established a new order of diplomatic and bilateral cooperation. Between that year and 2017, exports and imports grew from $4 billion to $600 billion. However, the trade deficit and the unfairness of trade practices are lingering issues between the two countries. Their persistence is a stain on the rest. I’ll explain.

A new trade war has been born of alternative asset classes like software, film, brand, and digital community, some of which is influenced by the politics of mainland China and some by our own state of politics. Platforms like Snapchat, Twitter, Reddit, and Google have been barred from operating in mainland China in the name of government-sponsored censorship. Until recently, we have never threatened reciprocity. The government-sponsored forced sale of TikTok changes that. Oracle, led by major Republican donor Larry Ellison, has won the bid for TikTok’s US operations.

It’s not a clean acquisition of operations, and Oracle is expected to be positioned more as a national overseer of operations – a “trusted tech partner” in the US – rather than fully in charge of the reins. In an unsettling new setting of precedences, the White House will get to have final say over whether or not it’s a done deal. [2PM, 1]

With questions remaining on what the acquisition (or partnership) entails, the official dispatch from Beijing stated that TikTok parent ByteDance will not sell the algorithm with the creative community. The value of the platform is that algorithm. In essence, we are willing to let die an economic engine for creators and commerce just to return fire at China. For decades, trade policy between the two super powers mostly excluded soft industry but with piercing language from the highest rungs of government. That has changed. In War Games, I explain:

But with the US Secretary of State signaling that more actions are coming, the crackdown is looming. Cited earlier this month, Secretary Mike Pompeo stated that American businesses should be wary of “untrusted” Chinese technology. He also cited the dangers of Alibaba’s cloud networks. [2PM, 2]

Geopolitical tensions are accelerating trends that will have damning effects on American small businesses and venture-backed growth companies alike. The trade war has continued for nearly two years, Beijing and Taiwan are at odds over military activity in the South China Sea, China’s early handling of an epidemic-turned-pandemic has led to distrust between its business peers, and China’s relations with Hong Kong are further complicating trade matters in international business. Not to mention, potential of an American Spring has left international observers questioning the authenticity of it all. Action here and inaction elsewhere is a confusing position. America’s largest corporations supporting activism domestically and not abroad further complicates matters.

The calculus works in America where companies like Nike, Disney, and Apple skew younger and liberal. That same calculus falls flat in China where the wrong type of support for an identical form of activism can thwart business advances. Look no further than the release of Mulan.

This week, Mulan held the No. 1 position on Disney+’s trending tab. According to CinemaBlend, the film had a 15% share of all streams vs. Hamilton‘s 10% share in its first full weekend. Additionally, Mulan improved Disney+’s downloads by 68% with in-app purchases up 193%. This is in addition to a reported $30 million American opening for the film hosted exclusively on Disney+. In mainland China, the reception was not as positive, stemming from a report that the film required cooperation with officials in Xinjiang, a region that houses alleged mass internment camps for ethnic minorities and has been accused of forced labor practices.

Activists rushed out a new #BoycottMulan campaign, and Disney found itself the latest example of a global company stumbling as the United States and China increasingly clash over human rights, trade and security, even as their economies remain entwined. [3]

The result was an effective boycott of the film, which opened to an underwhelming $23 million in China. Last week, Alibaba’s Taopiaopiao movie review platform published poor social scores, shorting demand for the film and reflecting a disconnect between Disney’s efforts to premiere a calculated movie that required data, focus groups, and government approval to film. Disney’s Mulan was made for Chinese audiences by the Chinese and with the Chinese. The disparity between its American reception and its Chinese failure is an indicator that not even Disney can navigate the great divide between the two nations.

US Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo) condemned Disney for filming in the region, in what he called an effort to “whitewash” the region’s wrongs. The politics of the global economy are growing more and more complicated. Of the Fortune 500, the following businesses have also been connected to Xinjiang: Amazon, Exxon, Ford, General Electric, Citigroup, Dell, PepsiCo, FedEx, Coca Cola, Nike, Heinz, Abbott Laboratories, and Oracle – the reported owner of TikTok’s US operations – according to a 2018 article by ChinaFile, an online magazine on US-China relations.

We’ve blurred the lines between socio politics, human rights and corporate business to the point that we’ve failed to realize the implications caused when those blurred lines are no longer acceptable. The United States has the most incarcerated population on earth. The private prison system is a big business with outposts near our homes, our stadiums, our factories, and our office centers. As far back as the 1990s, American prison labor employed industries like telemarketing, technical manufacturing, and for brands like Victoria’s Secret [4]. It would take us years to separate our corporate culture from this system and yet, our corporations present with an heir of virtue here and abroad.

Not to mention, a potential American Spring has left international observers questioning the authenticity of it all. Action here and inaction elsewhere is certainly a confusing position. America’s largest corporations supporting activism domestically and not abroad further complicates matters.

In War Games, I concluded with, “Businesses must begin to account for these shifts in geopolitics.” Now that corporatism and politics are so intertwined, it is only a matter of time before scenarios like these – unforeseen just a few years ago – become commonplace. The great concern for American business is that it will become too difficult to account for these variables at any scale.

Disney’s international box office numbers for Mulan flopped in historic fashion for reasons in and out of its control. But consider the long-tail effects of the discourse around its suffering performance. I’d surmise that fewer American corporations will be willing to compete on foreign grounds given the growing sociopolitical complexity. And with new precedent set in the United States by the TikTok acquisition, we can expect reciprocity in that respect. It’s important to remember that we have sociopolitical complexities of our own and in this era of global economy, that makes our physical exports, Hollywood films, and software platforms just as vulnerable. Consumer confidence could use paths for efficient corporate growth, but the two great national economies seem to be at odds more so now than ever. The great divide will grow. And more than ever, the American consumer will notice.

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes | 艺术:亚历克斯-雷米 |关于 2PM

Read part 1 of 2: War Games

备忘录重温 H.E.N.R.Y.

jNNeOpvQ

Every week, there is a new retailer in distress. It’s time to consider how much of America’s retail economy was built on a class of consumers that was never as static as once believed: the middle class.

Many legacy retail brands, marketplaces, and department stores are at an impasse. For decades, they successfully marketed to a group of Americans that would neither rise nor fall from their economic standing. When that consumer cohort faced job losses or other financial uncertainties, retailers responded by offering promotions to attract them to their stores. In the previous decade, those promotional efforts haven’t let up. Few retail executives seemed to consider the longer-term sociological trends that impact class and consumer confidence.

Consider Ralph Lauren Corporation’s (RL) current struggles. According to a Credit Suisse report, the retailer grew digital sales just 3% in Q2 of 2020. This was against the backdrop of historic online retail growth for retailers. The stock is currently trading near five-year lows; much can be attributed to their poor promotional strategy and a lack of investment into direct-to-consumer business. According to Retail Dive:

The brand also noted in its meetings with Credit Suisse that it plans to take the pandemic as a time to aggressively pivot from low-value online customers and pursue higher-margin customers, a demographic which the company believes to be more accommodating of its recent price increases, reduced promotions and higher-end selection of products. [3]

A product of the 1980s, Ralph Lauren and its peers assumed that some things would never change. That didn’t hold true.

From the Far South to the North Shore

Like many children of the ’80s, I devoured films like The Breakfast Club, Sixteen Candles, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, and Uncle Buck. The films were idyllic. From the images of economic prosperity to the confidence of the characters, I was drawn to it all. It wasn’t until I was an adult that I realized the cultural implications that served as the backdrop of John Hughes’ work – the fractured city, itself.

Mr. Hughes, whose father was a roofing salesman, used these communities to explore issues of class, status and consumerism as well as the tension and attraction between suburb and city in ’80s America. [1]

The basis of 2PM’s Regarding HENRY report was the 1980s Lisa Birnbach book, The Official Preppy Handbook. That book, along with Hughes’ work, projected an image of ascendant wealth, ease, and certainty to an entire generation of consumers.

The book was written for what was then called Yuppies: a young person with a well-paid job and a fashionable lifestyle. Originally published in October of 1980, the book was co-authored and edited by Lisa Birnbach and illustrated by Oliver Williams. The manuscript played second fiddle to the now-iconic illustrations, ones that served as a guide for consumers and brands for nearly two decades. It was more than a north star for where to go to school, or party on weekends, or which members-only clubs to apply to. [2PM, 2]

Like Hughes’ work, Chicago’s North Shore is omnipresent throughout Birnbach’s satirical take on wealth and class in America. My youthful fascination with Hughes’ Chicago was replaced by a newer, more inquisitive one as I began to visit the city in my 20s and 30s.

America is bifurcating socially, politically, and economically. In these scenarios, the masses move towards one of two proverbial poles. In many cities, there cannot be one without the other. In Chicago, the poles are also literal. Over decades – with a diminished focus on achieving a steady middle class – some resources shifted away from the working class and towards growing the upper class. Most of the resources were misspent elsewhere, furthering the disadvantage of the working class. In just a 45 minute drive through Greater Chicago, you can observe two distinct worlds of diametrically opposed attributes: war versus peace, struggle versus ease, shortfall versus abundance.

This part of the Midwest region along Lake Michigan is a living example of Heraclitus’ Doctrine of Flux and the Unity of Opposites [5]. A Greek philosopher who lived around 500 B.C., Heraclitus claimed that each opposite is inseparable. The opposites depend on one another; this dependence forms the identity of each opposite. If one of the pair disappears so will the other, according to the philosopher.

Imagine two contrasting worlds separated by 25 miles and you’ll begin to understand Chicago’s disparities. The design of the city has bolstered this divide. There are physical barriers, bridges that can be lifted, and a quiet tension between the haves and the have nots. As of recently, the tension has grown beyond quiet and beyond the artificial borders. A citizen who lives in the city’s far South Side has a median wage of $26,400, according to a 2018 article in The Atlantic. However, an astonishing one-fourth of the city’s citizens earn north of $100,000. According to Redfin, the average home price in the North Shore area of Winnetka is $1.28 million. The respective unemployment rates of the North and South Sides are 4.7% and 16%, according to the same report. One cannot exist without the other; both sides squeeze the middle.

When I last visited Chicago, I saw it for myself. In August, I drove from O’Hare Airport towards the 100-block of East 132nd Street to visit an old friend’s grandmother. I stayed at her home for 45 minutes or so, but the impression was lasting. Everyone that I encountered wanted the literal and figurative mobility that many who read this will take for granted. In the week that followed, six local residents would die within one-fourth of a mile from the porch where I sat. The Eden Garden neighborhood of Chicago has an intensity that you won’t quite understand until you’re there for yourself.

I made my way from East 132nd street and along Route 41. One lakeside road ushered me from the city’s South Side to Evanston, one of the most noteworthy areas along the city’s North Shore and the home of Northwestern University. This is John Hughes’ and Lisa Birnbach’s Chicago. The experience was diametrically opposed to my 45 minutes elsewhere: peace, ease, and abundance. I was comfortable enough in both worlds to be able to assess their impact on the other.

In every city, you will find these lines of demarcation, though few are as clear as Chicago’s. The pandemic has accelerated the reshaping of the groups defined by these lines.

On one side, remote work is practical and desirable. Access to capital allows for short-term gains in the stock market. Savings accounts and low unemployment rates ensure a continuation of life within the new normal. It’s as if this period of economic distress hasn’t existed at all.

On the South Side, wage work and income require a physical presence and a tolerance for health risk. These are the dignified hourly workers that make our economy move, though they receive no credit for doing so. There is little to no access to capital on their side; there is no taking advantage of record market gains during record highs in unemployment. There isn’t even capable WiFi access for many. For these citizens, nothing is the same as it was before the lockdown. Matters found a way to further devolve. And for a subset of them, impossibly hard circumstances have worsened. Remote learning is mandated for families whom cannot work from home or support the infrastructure required to learn remotely.

This is the backdrop. American retailers suffered because they didn’t foresee the bifurcation of wealth, access, and humanity that was staring back at them. When you review a list of bankruptcies and closures, you will notice that they will skew towards companies that have built strategies around a perpetual middle class. But in my trip along Route 41, there was no middle class to observe. For our consumer economy (one that employs nearly 30 million Americans) to return to form, enterprise retailers will have to understand the core message of “HENRY.” The middle was never really static at all.

HENRY Revisited

The HENRY designation is short for “high earners not rich yet.” The acronym system of identification has become popular with analysts, however, this consumer classification has gone largely ignored by enterprise retailers.

af39Sn5T

Whether by acronym or not, the pandemic has been witness to this phenomenon. Access to suburban escapes, remote work or educational benefits, and day-trading volume were but a few of the tell-tale signs. In New York and Brooklyn, residents fled to New England and the Hamptons. In the Midwest, the upper peninsula of Michigan was a hot spot for this psychographic. On the West Coast, rents in the Bay Area’s suburbs grew as rents in the city fell as much as 15%.

When Ralph Lauren Corporation cites a strategy to modernize its business by creating “smart customer profiles,” it is the HENRY designation that the brand is speaking of.

The HENRYs are advancers, not necessarily those who have cleared the wealth bar to America’s elite class. In fact, many are working to leave the middle class as if it’s a blemish on their personal ambitions. In this way, the term is more inclusive than the yuppie moniker of yesteryear. It’s also a symptom of our current economy, one where the cost of living can begin to erode long-term investments like real estate, money market funds, or other equities. [2PM, 2]

As Heraclitus wrote, “life is flux.” The focus on early identification of the upwardly mobile is one that will become commonplace in marketing and branding. As target metrics like customer acquisition cost (CAC) and lifetime value (LTV) dominate eCommerce-first retail, I’d argue that there is another that will arise: duration of loyalty (DOL). Brands will identify certain customers early and follow them throughout their education and careers, a strategy commonly practiced in the automobile industry.

As enterprise retailers like Ralph Lauren begin to smart-target the middle class, the days of shallow promotional efforts will give way to the notion of flux. By targeting these customers appropriately, the hope is that many will remain loyal as they ascend to greater discretionary income and higher consumption.

In Sanitized Urbanization, 2PM explored the larger trend of urbanites moving to suburban areas. Across America, the upwardly mobile pursued exurban peace, ease, and abundance. Some sought permanent moves. In theory, these areas brought a calmer pace, cleaner air, and functioning local retailers. These were things that were once considered essential, today they are luxuries. In these areas, amenities like parks and beaches provided a sense of normalcy.

Sanitized urbanization removes the perceived risks of living in urban areas while adding the value of – what’s often – upgraded infrastructure, improved schools, and lower tax bases. It is likely to become a politicized issue once urban municipalities begin to suffer the full force of the migration away from city centers. [2PM, 4]

Like many phenomena, the pandemic accelerated existing trends: sanitized urbanization, remote work, online retail, in-home fitness, and a decreasing dependence on personal vehicles. For the professionals who were comfortable with this shifting economy, a great many of them achieved financial breakthroughs despite the economy’s vulnerability. The vulnerability has never been equally distributed. One of the last bastions of economic mobility is America’s 29+ million retail jobs. To protect what’s left of them, retailers must begin to see the market this way. The industry’s stodgy retail executives seem to lack the ability and foresight to do so.

This cohort of professionals is a cross-section of race, ethnicity, and gender though many share similar traits in quality of education, career, and social standing. This psychographic is due to become the key study in the next five to 10 years of retail marketing and communications development. HENRY is beginning to live up to its name. There is a new guard of creative leaders, solo capitalists, and ascendant executives to show for it.

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes | 艺术:亚历克斯-雷米 |关于 2PM

Original Report: Regarding H.E.N.R.Y. 

备忘录净化城市化

lq6VTxGM

有加速。有发明。还有中断。今天,我们正在同时驾驭这三者。

美国经济的数字化正在使消费者倾向于网上零售。这是一种加速趋势。像 Zoom 这样小众产品,吸引了工作场所、家庭和社会团体的关注,成为了定义大流行的技术。还有宏观经济趋势的干扰 大西洋月刊》的德里克-汤普森(Derek Thompson)预测了城市零售和餐饮业中断的影响。

我们正在进入一个新的零售进化阶段,在这个阶段,大公司将变得越来越大,许多母婴店的梦想将破灭,连锁店将大量涌现,使许多社区的特色变得平淡无奇,更多的经济活动将流向电子商务,而餐饮业将经历一场自禁酒令以来从未有过的变革。[1]

他的报告写于 2020 年 5 月,当时正值美国零售业倒闭的高峰期,报告描绘了一幅灰暗的图景,我当时并不同意。德里克-汤普森是对的。一些城市、公司和组织已经设法进行了调整。比如,布鲁克林的威廉斯堡掌握了户外座位。露露柠檬(Lululemon)和苹果(Apple)等公司都严格执行了社会距离规定。而美国国家篮球协会已经证明,在接触性运动中管理病毒性疾病是可行的。

但是,还有一个更大的干扰需要考虑,即短期影响让位于长期影响。曾经定义农村、郊区和城市空间的特征正在发生变化,它们之间的界限也越来越模糊。这将给我们的生活和购物方式带来长期变化。在为Polymathic Audio 第 8 期进行的 2PM 对话中,汤普森开宗明义地说道:

我走在街上,左顾右盼,看到的是一排排漆黑的橱窗。我大声问自己:"这些商店中,哪家会在六个月或十二个月后重新开张?"[下午2点2分]

这取决于你住在哪里。二线城市(想想纳什维尔、哥伦布、夏洛特或匹兹堡)的生活充满了神秘感,拥有 "大城市 "的城市体验,商业房地产开发商因此在城市更新方面下了重注。

乔治-华盛顿大学商学院和美国智能增长协会(Smart Growth America)最近与 Yardi Matrix 联合对美国最大的 30 个大都市进行的一项研究发现,在过去十年中,与没有这种组合的城市相比,包含办公、住房、零售和娱乐的步行街区增长更快,吸纳量和租金增长也更高。在此期间,70% 的工作岗位是在美国排名前 50 的大都市中创造的。[6]

在这种情况下,开发商会夷平被认为价值较低的现有房产,建造豪华的多用途房产。在美国中西部,曾经充斥着价值 600 美元的公寓或独户住宅的地区被重新开发成吸引千禧一代和 Z 世代年轻消费者的生活空间。大量涌入的人力资本现在支持着商业更新(想想:先有受众,再有产品)。令人垂涎的餐厅、更好的酒吧和更精致的商店纷纷涌现。这些零售业的投资者和所有者都将赌注押在了流动性和合格的客流量上。随着该地区执法力度的加强,城市将保护这些新的投资区域,使其免受一年前存在的其余因素的影响。

随着这一进程的继续,商业开发商的胆子也越来越大。他们最大限度地利用了已经处于转型期的城市中心区域。但随着地方、州和国家的发展势头转向城市重建(与之相匹配的是就业市场),他们下了更大的赌注。于是,他们在尚未开始转型的地区建造豪华的多功能地产。这些濒临危险的城市片区开发难度更大,但提前开发的回报也更高。这既是一个良性循环,也是一场豪赌。

有三个供应方面的考虑促成了前几年的城市改造:

  • 人力资本(人口密度)
  • 低失业率
  • 实体零售需求(品牌和餐饮投资兴趣)

城市开始出现各类供方需求不足的问题。这将表现为美国城市化趋势代价高昂的中断。如果这种中断持续足够长的时间,教科书上对城市化的定义就会嘎然而止。

人力资本

远程工作行业的加速发展必将推动城市化进程的中断。J.D. Power 最近的一项脉搏调查发现,三分之一(35%)的受访者计划在未来三个月内进行家庭装修项目。在这些调查中,40% 的人将 "意外增加的在家时间 "作为项目的原因。对于那些有能力的人来说,居住在市区租赁房产的动机已开始转向郊区投资。在 31 个跟踪调查的都市区中,有 14 个都市区的郊区住宅投资已开始超过城市更新的成果。

在全国范围内,市区销售价格的降幅比郊区高出 6 个百分点。在冠状病毒爆发前,郊区销售价格中位数同比增长 6.4%,市区销售价格中位数同比增长 9.3%。到 6 月底,价格增长率分别降至 3.3% 和 0%。在全国范围内,销售价格中位数的同比增长已放缓至约 2%。[5]

这一趋势受到了远程工作的广泛影响。Salesforce 宣布,到 8 月 21 日,员工将可以在家工作。

Salesforce 还扩大了员工的远程办公福利,在今年早些时候为员工提供 250 美元办公用品的基础上,又为每人提供了 250 美元。父母还可以选择多休六周的带薪休假。[3]

脸书、微软、亚马逊、谷歌等公司以及其他传统上引领全球技术劳动力发展的大型企业也纷纷效仿。从历史上看,这些工作岗位增加了整个一、二线城市及其城市中心的人力资本来源。

低失业率

美国国税局最近预测,2021 年基于 W-2 的 "雇员分类 "工作岗位将减少 3720 万个[4]。他们还预测,到 2027 年,W-2 申请量将有所下降。对于那些保住了工作的人来说,向郊区转移的意图已导致许多公司剥离实体零售、餐饮和其他消费型投资。经济学家认为,临时性裁员将成为永久性裁员。

"布里格斯总结道:"我们的分析表明,近四分之一的临时裁员将成为永久性裁员,这意味着这些人中大约有 200 万人(占劳动力总数的 1.25%)将在明年继续失业。[8]

实体零售需求

最近有消息称,时尚零售平台 Rent the Runway 永久关闭了四家零售店。这些实体店面均位于城市地区。在 Bonobos 和 Warby Parker 等零售商的推动下,经过长达十年的趋势发展,直接面向消费者的品牌(以及咖啡店和独立酒吧)成为可靠的信号来源。随着这些品牌进入新焕发生机的街区,传统零售商、餐馆也很快跟进。

与许多斥巨资鼓励这种转型的城市一样,俄亥俄州测试城也开始出现裂痕,那里的城市酒店开发速度创下了历史新高。

数据分析公司 Trepp 的数据显示,截至 7 月份,哥伦布大都会区的 17 笔 CMBS 酒店贷款中有近 40% 出现拖欠,债务总额达 8700 万美元。根据 Trepp 的数据,在全美范围内,拖欠率为 23.4%,创下历史最高纪录。[7]

这些都是需要考虑的大量信息。但在这些趋势的交汇处,似乎有一个明显的受益者。随着汽车保有量的减少和远程办公的兴起,受益的郊区已将其区域发展成类似于城市中心的城市要求。

净化城市化

多中心开发是一种交通连接、城市规划、混合用途开发和先进设计理念的模式。观点专栏作家诺亚-史密斯最近为彭博社撰写了以下文章:

"郊区 "在 20 世纪 70 年代的含义已不尽相同。当时,这个词让人联想到商场、被宽阔草坪隔开的单户住宅和同质化的白人人口。为了吸引今天的都市人,郊区必须提供一些与众不同的东西。[8]

这些加速、中断和发明的结果是一种新的郊区发展分类,随着年轻收入者不断逃离城市,这种分类将变得更加普遍。用更亲切的话来说 净化城市化将城市更新的精华部分移植到中上层阶级和富裕的郊区。俄亥俄州都柏林的大桥公园(Bridge Park )就是多中心开发的典范,这里有会员俱乐部、现代化酒店和顶级餐厅:

我们所建设的社区,重点是让您--居民、游客和行动派--能够方便地步行前往餐厅、零售服务、便利设施、公园、自行车道、桥梁、健身中心等。[10]

从更直观的角度来看,这一概念是将城市生活与郊区的 "排他性 "利益并列起来。净化城市化消除了居住在城市地区的风险,同时增加了基础设施升级、学校改善和税基降低等价值。一旦城市开始遭受远离城市中心的人口迁移所带来的全部影响,这很可能会成为一个政治化的问题。这方面的早期迹象已经显现:自大流行病开始以来,街道和人行道的维护一直很差。大部分独立餐厅和零售店都在这些地区倒闭,从而降低了这些地区的吸引力。许多像哥伦布这样的大城市在 8 个月内遭受了 1-2-3 重创:大流行病、社会动荡、失业率升高和无家可归者增多,恢复起来十分缓慢。

其结果可能是,一代又一代人重新回到与城市发展相似的郊区:这些地区现在配备了与繁华大城市常见的多用途公寓、外部地标、购物、餐饮和步行便利性。这种郊区环形大道是美国购物中心建筑师的最初构想。维克多-格鲁恩(Victor Gruen)在 20 世纪 50 年代的明尼苏达州提出了这些包罗万象的开发项目。

[维克多-格鲁恩(Victor Gruen)对城镇中心风格的零售中心(灵感来自维也纳的环形大街)充满了灵感和未来主义的理想主义,但却被他无法预料的社会经济动荡所掩盖。[2PM, 9]

零售商现在有能力在大都市的更大范围内提供服务,可以在新的地区集中实体店,而不需要大卖场或容纳它们的购物中心。从某种程度上说,美国郊区终于有能力发展格鲁恩在 20 世纪 50 年代为最初的美国购物中心提出理想时所设想的业态。随着电子商务基础设施的普及和多中心开发的优先发展,郊区将更像城市。而零售商也将紧随其后。

报道:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes |关于 2PM