备忘录公私线性游戏

他们做了什么?消息传来时,我正和一小群投资者坐在办公室里:切尔宁集团完成了将 Barstool Sports 的大部分股份出售给宾州博彩公司的交易。全场一片哗然。在 2016 年的一笔交易中,切尔宁冒险押注这家备受争议的媒体公司,结果却成为近代史上最明智的私人市场媒体交易之一。具有讽刺意味的是,在传统的风险投资领域,没有人会把有限合伙人的资金冒险投向戴夫-波特诺伊和他的一帮人物。但是,许多投资者却希望他们这么做。宾夕法尼亚大学的交易对在场的许多人来说并不合理。为什么这么早?

投资人、媒体人兼作家安东尼-庞普利亚诺(Anthony Pompliano)在 2017 年发表的一篇文章开篇就评价道:"Barstool Sports 正在打造世界上最有价值的媒体公司"。庞普利亚诺花了很多时间评估这家初创公司在体育媒体中的作用,他在文章的最后写道:"我们的目标是成为世界上最有价值的媒体公司:

我只是希望,[波特诺伊]不要因为害怕而过早出售公司,因为他无法驾驭真正的伟大。[1]

Chernin 集团在本文发表三年后出售 Barstool 是否为时过早,我们拭目以待。但其结果却是近代历史上传统零售商最引人入胜的转机之一,而且数据表明,Chernin 可能已经开创了一种其他公司很快会效仿的战略。就在七个月前,Chernin 投资了利基媒体公司 MeatEater, Inc.这笔交易使首席执行官凯文-斯隆(Kevin Sloan)得以加速公司的线性商务战略。新闻稿说得很简单这笔交易标志着 MeatEater 计划从内容扩展到商业的一个重要里程碑,并巩固了 MeatEater 创始人 Steven Rinella 与 First Lite 团队之间的长期合作关系。

今年夏天,切尔宁集团(The Chernin Group)向该特许经营店注入了 5000 万美元的额外资金,成为其主要股东。这笔资金部分用于 MeatEater 的首次收购。公司在今年夏天收购了First Lite,这是一个与公司合作多年的技术服装品牌。[2]

但宾州博彩公司的交易不同。这是一笔公开交易,其价值可以量化,这在私人市场上是找不到的。

公共/私人线性游戏

切尔宁集团掌握了线性商务。如果你打造了一个伟大的产品,你就需要一个有机的、充满激情的受众群体。对于拥有忠实受众的公司来说,他们需要产品和服务来支持他们。数字经济会奖励那些在媒体和商业之间游刃有余的公司。

由传媒巨头彼得-切尔宁(Peter Chernin)和杰西-雅各布斯(Jesse Jacobs)领导的切尔宁集团(TCG)从来都不是一家传统的私募股权公司。据波特诺伊称,TCG 是 2016 年唯一的出价。在公司高管迈克-科恩斯(Mike Kerns)的考察下,TCG 帮助 Barstool 从朋友间简单的现金流良好的运营发展成为由前雅虎副总裁、美国在线首席营销官艾丽卡-纳尔迪尼(Erika Nardini)领导的成熟运营。

严格来说,TCG 确实提前卖掉了 Barstool。但也不算太早。考虑到该公司的收购者,洛杉矶的投资者似乎并不担心时机仓促。他们可能已经意识到,Barstool 的价值将创造出连 Penn Gaming 也无法预测的财富。凭借剩余的上升空间(TCG 仍持有 Barstool 的股份)和新收购的宾夕法尼亚博彩公司(Penn Gaming,一家公开上市的赌场控股公司)的股票,TCG 从一个体育博客中创造出了独角兽资产。

TCG 最终完成了这一交易,为公私线性商务活动绘制了蓝图,我们将会看到更多这样的交易。与此同时,宾夕法尼亚州更强大的竞争对手也在通过传统的合作方式实现同样的目标。本周,米高梅(MGM)宣布与演员、喜剧演员和音乐家杰米-福克斯(Jamie Foxx)达成合作协议,传统实业家认为这是这家大型赌场和酒店运营商的明智之举。

本周二,BetMGM 宣布福克斯(Foxx)同意出演其新的广告宣传活动,该活动以其 "体育博彩之王 "的自称为核心。可能是借鉴了百威啤酒的 "啤酒之王",也可能是借用了其狮子标志,意为丛林之王。无论如何,杰米-福克斯的加盟一定会引起人们的关注和尊重。

BetMGM 体育博彩公司反映了博彩合法化的转变,DraftKings 和 FanDuel 等数字创新公司使博彩民主化,进入了互联网商业时代。许多人不同意米高梅坚持的观点,即福克斯的影响将使米高梅度假村和 GVC 控股公司的合资企业取得宾夕法尼亚博彩公司(Penn Gaming)所取得的成就。

无标题

我有一个坏消息要告诉 BetMGM:投注者不在乎杰米-福克斯对体育赌博的看法。他们关心 @PatMcAfeeShow 说了什么。https://t.co/wJTr1B6dMv

与米高梅度假村(2019 年总收入达 129 亿美元)不同,你可能从未听说过宾夕法尼亚博彩公司(Penn Gaming)或其旗下的一些机构。宾夕法尼亚博彩公司拥有 18700 多名员工,足迹遍布美国中西部和南部,旗下拥有并经营着五家赛马场和赌场。2019 年,公司收入超过 51 亿美元,营业收入达 5 亿美元。在近代史上体育最不幸的时期之一,收购 Barstool Sports 至少是使公司市值从最高收入的 1 倍增长到 2.5 倍的部分原因。宾夕法尼亚博彩公司在截至 6 月 30 日的季度收入为 3.06 亿美元,同比下降 76.91%。由于大流行病导致大学和职业体育赛季停摆,Barstool 的内容工厂支撑起了这家因合法化恶习而缺乏运营收入的公司的股价。

宾夕法尼亚州博彩公司(Penn Gaming)年近 55 岁,拥有忠实的受众和数字优先的未来,这将使其能够与 DraftKings、FanDuel 以及 William Hill、Fox Bet、BetRivers、PointsBet 和上述 BetMGM 等公司的举措相抗衡。随着 Barstool Sportsbook 在宾夕法尼亚州的推出,早期迹象表明了它的潜力。该应用程序的体育博彩下载量遥遥领先于其他所有应用程序。美国银行的 Shaun Kelley 指出:

我们对该应用的初步印象是积极的,因为它易于使用,并利用 Barstool 品牌创造了独特的互动体验。我们认为,与竞争对手相比,该应用程序的目标用户更偏向于休闲投注者。

宾夕法尼亚博彩公司(Penn Gaming)对 Barstool Sports(以及切尔宁集团(The Chernin Group)对宾夕法尼亚博彩公司的押注)的价值就体现在这里。随着体育博彩合法化的不断深入,休闲球迷将不断转变为赌徒,而这将在 Barstool 比 Penn Gaming 的竞争对手更擅长的渠道上实现:互联网。但这 66 亿美元的增值不仅仅是博彩业或整个体育行业的战略。

公/私线性游戏是指以商业为基础的公司收购受众,或以受众为基础的公司收购产品。Barstool Sports 的收购证明,非相邻的私人市场收购可以产生巨大的市场推动力,因此我们将看到更多这样的收购。线性商务战略并不是直接面向消费者的品牌或影响者内容的专利。即使是历史最悠久的机构,也可以采用这种战略来对抗其较大的竞争对手。宾夕法尼亚博彩公司已经证明了这一点。通过这样做,他们已经成功地为未来做好了准备,因为未来的数字化程度可能会超过行业的准备程度。

报道:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes | 艺术:亚历克斯-雷米 |关于 2PM

备忘录巨大的鸿沟

War Games, continued. We often believe a partisan divide to be a purely American phenomenon, but there may be no greater example of the volatile intersection of politics and global economics than the state of trade policy of China and the United States. Perhaps it’s always been this way. But this new competitive precedent has been established upon new ground.

In 1979, the US and China established a new order of diplomatic and bilateral cooperation. Between that year and 2017, exports and imports grew from $4 billion to $600 billion. However, the trade deficit and the unfairness of trade practices are lingering issues between the two countries. Their persistence is a stain on the rest. I’ll explain.

A new trade war has been born of alternative asset classes like software, film, brand, and digital community, some of which is influenced by the politics of mainland China and some by our own state of politics. Platforms like Snapchat, Twitter, Reddit, and Google have been barred from operating in mainland China in the name of government-sponsored censorship. Until recently, we have never threatened reciprocity. The government-sponsored forced sale of TikTok changes that. Oracle, led by major Republican donor Larry Ellison, has won the bid for TikTok’s US operations.

It’s not a clean acquisition of operations, and Oracle is expected to be positioned more as a national overseer of operations – a “trusted tech partner” in the US – rather than fully in charge of the reins. In an unsettling new setting of precedences, the White House will get to have final say over whether or not it’s a done deal. [2PM, 1]

With questions remaining on what the acquisition (or partnership) entails, the official dispatch from Beijing stated that TikTok parent ByteDance will not sell the algorithm with the creative community. The value of the platform is that algorithm. In essence, we are willing to let die an economic engine for creators and commerce just to return fire at China. For decades, trade policy between the two super powers mostly excluded soft industry but with piercing language from the highest rungs of government. That has changed. In War Games, I explain:

But with the US Secretary of State signaling that more actions are coming, the crackdown is looming. Cited earlier this month, Secretary Mike Pompeo stated that American businesses should be wary of “untrusted” Chinese technology. He also cited the dangers of Alibaba’s cloud networks. [2PM, 2]

Geopolitical tensions are accelerating trends that will have damning effects on American small businesses and venture-backed growth companies alike. The trade war has continued for nearly two years, Beijing and Taiwan are at odds over military activity in the South China Sea, China’s early handling of an epidemic-turned-pandemic has led to distrust between its business peers, and China’s relations with Hong Kong are further complicating trade matters in international business. Not to mention, potential of an American Spring has left international observers questioning the authenticity of it all. Action here and inaction elsewhere is a confusing position. America’s largest corporations supporting activism domestically and not abroad further complicates matters.

The calculus works in America where companies like Nike, Disney, and Apple skew younger and liberal. That same calculus falls flat in China where the wrong type of support for an identical form of activism can thwart business advances. Look no further than the release of Mulan.

This week, Mulan held the No. 1 position on Disney+’s trending tab. According to CinemaBlend, the film had a 15% share of all streams vs. Hamilton‘s 10% share in its first full weekend. Additionally, Mulan improved Disney+’s downloads by 68% with in-app purchases up 193%. This is in addition to a reported $30 million American opening for the film hosted exclusively on Disney+. In mainland China, the reception was not as positive, stemming from a report that the film required cooperation with officials in Xinjiang, a region that houses alleged mass internment camps for ethnic minorities and has been accused of forced labor practices.

Activists rushed out a new #BoycottMulan campaign, and Disney found itself the latest example of a global company stumbling as the United States and China increasingly clash over human rights, trade and security, even as their economies remain entwined. [3]

The result was an effective boycott of the film, which opened to an underwhelming $23 million in China. Last week, Alibaba’s Taopiaopiao movie review platform published poor social scores, shorting demand for the film and reflecting a disconnect between Disney’s efforts to premiere a calculated movie that required data, focus groups, and government approval to film. Disney’s Mulan was made for Chinese audiences by the Chinese and with the Chinese. The disparity between its American reception and its Chinese failure is an indicator that not even Disney can navigate the great divide between the two nations.

US Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo) condemned Disney for filming in the region, in what he called an effort to “whitewash” the region’s wrongs. The politics of the global economy are growing more and more complicated. Of the Fortune 500, the following businesses have also been connected to Xinjiang: Amazon, Exxon, Ford, General Electric, Citigroup, Dell, PepsiCo, FedEx, Coca Cola, Nike, Heinz, Abbott Laboratories, and Oracle – the reported owner of TikTok’s US operations – according to a 2018 article by ChinaFile, an online magazine on US-China relations.

We’ve blurred the lines between socio politics, human rights and corporate business to the point that we’ve failed to realize the implications caused when those blurred lines are no longer acceptable. The United States has the most incarcerated population on earth. The private prison system is a big business with outposts near our homes, our stadiums, our factories, and our office centers. As far back as the 1990s, American prison labor employed industries like telemarketing, technical manufacturing, and for brands like Victoria’s Secret [4]. It would take us years to separate our corporate culture from this system and yet, our corporations present with an heir of virtue here and abroad.

Not to mention, a potential American Spring has left international observers questioning the authenticity of it all. Action here and inaction elsewhere is certainly a confusing position. America’s largest corporations supporting activism domestically and not abroad further complicates matters.

In War Games, I concluded with, “Businesses must begin to account for these shifts in geopolitics.” Now that corporatism and politics are so intertwined, it is only a matter of time before scenarios like these – unforeseen just a few years ago – become commonplace. The great concern for American business is that it will become too difficult to account for these variables at any scale.

Disney’s international box office numbers for Mulan flopped in historic fashion for reasons in and out of its control. But consider the long-tail effects of the discourse around its suffering performance. I’d surmise that fewer American corporations will be willing to compete on foreign grounds given the growing sociopolitical complexity. And with new precedent set in the United States by the TikTok acquisition, we can expect reciprocity in that respect. It’s important to remember that we have sociopolitical complexities of our own and in this era of global economy, that makes our physical exports, Hollywood films, and software platforms just as vulnerable. Consumer confidence could use paths for efficient corporate growth, but the two great national economies seem to be at odds more so now than ever. The great divide will grow. And more than ever, the American consumer will notice.

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes | 艺术:亚历克斯-雷米 |关于 2PM

Read part 1 of 2: War Games

备忘录重温 H.E.N.R.Y.

jNNeOpvQ

Every week, there is a new retailer in distress. It’s time to consider how much of America’s retail economy was built on a class of consumers that was never as static as once believed: the middle class.

Many legacy retail brands, marketplaces, and department stores are at an impasse. For decades, they successfully marketed to a group of Americans that would neither rise nor fall from their economic standing. When that consumer cohort faced job losses or other financial uncertainties, retailers responded by offering promotions to attract them to their stores. In the previous decade, those promotional efforts haven’t let up. Few retail executives seemed to consider the longer-term sociological trends that impact class and consumer confidence.

Consider Ralph Lauren Corporation’s (RL) current struggles. According to a Credit Suisse report, the retailer grew digital sales just 3% in Q2 of 2020. This was against the backdrop of historic online retail growth for retailers. The stock is currently trading near five-year lows; much can be attributed to their poor promotional strategy and a lack of investment into direct-to-consumer business. According to Retail Dive:

The brand also noted in its meetings with Credit Suisse that it plans to take the pandemic as a time to aggressively pivot from low-value online customers and pursue higher-margin customers, a demographic which the company believes to be more accommodating of its recent price increases, reduced promotions and higher-end selection of products. [3]

A product of the 1980s, Ralph Lauren and its peers assumed that some things would never change. That didn’t hold true.

From the Far South to the North Shore

Like many children of the ’80s, I devoured films like The Breakfast Club, Sixteen Candles, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, and Uncle Buck. The films were idyllic. From the images of economic prosperity to the confidence of the characters, I was drawn to it all. It wasn’t until I was an adult that I realized the cultural implications that served as the backdrop of John Hughes’ work – the fractured city, itself.

Mr. Hughes, whose father was a roofing salesman, used these communities to explore issues of class, status and consumerism as well as the tension and attraction between suburb and city in ’80s America. [1]

The basis of 2PM’s Regarding HENRY report was the 1980s Lisa Birnbach book, The Official Preppy Handbook. That book, along with Hughes’ work, projected an image of ascendant wealth, ease, and certainty to an entire generation of consumers.

The book was written for what was then called Yuppies: a young person with a well-paid job and a fashionable lifestyle. Originally published in October of 1980, the book was co-authored and edited by Lisa Birnbach and illustrated by Oliver Williams. The manuscript played second fiddle to the now-iconic illustrations, ones that served as a guide for consumers and brands for nearly two decades. It was more than a north star for where to go to school, or party on weekends, or which members-only clubs to apply to. [2PM, 2]

Like Hughes’ work, Chicago’s North Shore is omnipresent throughout Birnbach’s satirical take on wealth and class in America. My youthful fascination with Hughes’ Chicago was replaced by a newer, more inquisitive one as I began to visit the city in my 20s and 30s.

America is bifurcating socially, politically, and economically. In these scenarios, the masses move towards one of two proverbial poles. In many cities, there cannot be one without the other. In Chicago, the poles are also literal. Over decades – with a diminished focus on achieving a steady middle class – some resources shifted away from the working class and towards growing the upper class. Most of the resources were misspent elsewhere, furthering the disadvantage of the working class. In just a 45 minute drive through Greater Chicago, you can observe two distinct worlds of diametrically opposed attributes: war versus peace, struggle versus ease, shortfall versus abundance.

This part of the Midwest region along Lake Michigan is a living example of Heraclitus’ Doctrine of Flux and the Unity of Opposites [5]. A Greek philosopher who lived around 500 B.C., Heraclitus claimed that each opposite is inseparable. The opposites depend on one another; this dependence forms the identity of each opposite. If one of the pair disappears so will the other, according to the philosopher.

Imagine two contrasting worlds separated by 25 miles and you’ll begin to understand Chicago’s disparities. The design of the city has bolstered this divide. There are physical barriers, bridges that can be lifted, and a quiet tension between the haves and the have nots. As of recently, the tension has grown beyond quiet and beyond the artificial borders. A citizen who lives in the city’s far South Side has a median wage of $26,400, according to a 2018 article in The Atlantic. However, an astonishing one-fourth of the city’s citizens earn north of $100,000. According to Redfin, the average home price in the North Shore area of Winnetka is $1.28 million. The respective unemployment rates of the North and South Sides are 4.7% and 16%, according to the same report. One cannot exist without the other; both sides squeeze the middle.

When I last visited Chicago, I saw it for myself. In August, I drove from O’Hare Airport towards the 100-block of East 132nd Street to visit an old friend’s grandmother. I stayed at her home for 45 minutes or so, but the impression was lasting. Everyone that I encountered wanted the literal and figurative mobility that many who read this will take for granted. In the week that followed, six local residents would die within one-fourth of a mile from the porch where I sat. The Eden Garden neighborhood of Chicago has an intensity that you won’t quite understand until you’re there for yourself.

I made my way from East 132nd street and along Route 41. One lakeside road ushered me from the city’s South Side to Evanston, one of the most noteworthy areas along the city’s North Shore and the home of Northwestern University. This is John Hughes’ and Lisa Birnbach’s Chicago. The experience was diametrically opposed to my 45 minutes elsewhere: peace, ease, and abundance. I was comfortable enough in both worlds to be able to assess their impact on the other.

In every city, you will find these lines of demarcation, though few are as clear as Chicago’s. The pandemic has accelerated the reshaping of the groups defined by these lines.

On one side, remote work is practical and desirable. Access to capital allows for short-term gains in the stock market. Savings accounts and low unemployment rates ensure a continuation of life within the new normal. It’s as if this period of economic distress hasn’t existed at all.

On the South Side, wage work and income require a physical presence and a tolerance for health risk. These are the dignified hourly workers that make our economy move, though they receive no credit for doing so. There is little to no access to capital on their side; there is no taking advantage of record market gains during record highs in unemployment. There isn’t even capable WiFi access for many. For these citizens, nothing is the same as it was before the lockdown. Matters found a way to further devolve. And for a subset of them, impossibly hard circumstances have worsened. Remote learning is mandated for families whom cannot work from home or support the infrastructure required to learn remotely.

This is the backdrop. American retailers suffered because they didn’t foresee the bifurcation of wealth, access, and humanity that was staring back at them. When you review a list of bankruptcies and closures, you will notice that they will skew towards companies that have built strategies around a perpetual middle class. But in my trip along Route 41, there was no middle class to observe. For our consumer economy (one that employs nearly 30 million Americans) to return to form, enterprise retailers will have to understand the core message of “HENRY.” The middle was never really static at all.

HENRY Revisited

The HENRY designation is short for “high earners not rich yet.” The acronym system of identification has become popular with analysts, however, this consumer classification has gone largely ignored by enterprise retailers.

af39Sn5T

Whether by acronym or not, the pandemic has been witness to this phenomenon. Access to suburban escapes, remote work or educational benefits, and day-trading volume were but a few of the tell-tale signs. In New York and Brooklyn, residents fled to New England and the Hamptons. In the Midwest, the upper peninsula of Michigan was a hot spot for this psychographic. On the West Coast, rents in the Bay Area’s suburbs grew as rents in the city fell as much as 15%.

When Ralph Lauren Corporation cites a strategy to modernize its business by creating “smart customer profiles,” it is the HENRY designation that the brand is speaking of.

The HENRYs are advancers, not necessarily those who have cleared the wealth bar to America’s elite class. In fact, many are working to leave the middle class as if it’s a blemish on their personal ambitions. In this way, the term is more inclusive than the yuppie moniker of yesteryear. It’s also a symptom of our current economy, one where the cost of living can begin to erode long-term investments like real estate, money market funds, or other equities. [2PM, 2]

As Heraclitus wrote, “life is flux.” The focus on early identification of the upwardly mobile is one that will become commonplace in marketing and branding. As target metrics like customer acquisition cost (CAC) and lifetime value (LTV) dominate eCommerce-first retail, I’d argue that there is another that will arise: duration of loyalty (DOL). Brands will identify certain customers early and follow them throughout their education and careers, a strategy commonly practiced in the automobile industry.

As enterprise retailers like Ralph Lauren begin to smart-target the middle class, the days of shallow promotional efforts will give way to the notion of flux. By targeting these customers appropriately, the hope is that many will remain loyal as they ascend to greater discretionary income and higher consumption.

In Sanitized Urbanization, 2PM explored the larger trend of urbanites moving to suburban areas. Across America, the upwardly mobile pursued exurban peace, ease, and abundance. Some sought permanent moves. In theory, these areas brought a calmer pace, cleaner air, and functioning local retailers. These were things that were once considered essential, today they are luxuries. In these areas, amenities like parks and beaches provided a sense of normalcy.

Sanitized urbanization removes the perceived risks of living in urban areas while adding the value of – what’s often – upgraded infrastructure, improved schools, and lower tax bases. It is likely to become a politicized issue once urban municipalities begin to suffer the full force of the migration away from city centers. [2PM, 4]

Like many phenomena, the pandemic accelerated existing trends: sanitized urbanization, remote work, online retail, in-home fitness, and a decreasing dependence on personal vehicles. For the professionals who were comfortable with this shifting economy, a great many of them achieved financial breakthroughs despite the economy’s vulnerability. The vulnerability has never been equally distributed. One of the last bastions of economic mobility is America’s 29+ million retail jobs. To protect what’s left of them, retailers must begin to see the market this way. The industry’s stodgy retail executives seem to lack the ability and foresight to do so.

This cohort of professionals is a cross-section of race, ethnicity, and gender though many share similar traits in quality of education, career, and social standing. This psychographic is due to become the key study in the next five to 10 years of retail marketing and communications development. HENRY is beginning to live up to its name. There is a new guard of creative leaders, solo capitalists, and ascendant executives to show for it.

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes | 艺术:亚历克斯-雷米 |关于 2PM

Original Report: Regarding H.E.N.R.Y.