第 336 期:"更多的循环

There is a subtle trend bubbling beneath the Rothys and Veja’s of urban dwelling millennials. There is a rise in 20 and 30-something workers who choose to take mental health days off from work, citing burnout. CBD-based goods are commonplace throughout specialty retailers’ checkout lines. Meditation apps and hardware are tipping into the mainstream. Rather than the consumption of more and more goods, high-earning millennials are choosing to take time off instead. This shift in priority is in-line with another: the boom of companies pursuing valuation arbitrage by identifying new paths to growth. WeWork, perhaps the case study par excellence of this business cycle crashed –  on demand  – with the help of an angry, financially-free NYU Professor with nothing to lose.

Two trends lead this report: (1) the shift towards mental minimalism and (2) the shift away from the business cycle of more. In a January report in BuzzFeed News, the first of the two began to pick up steam in the mainstream media:

So what now? Should I meditate more, negotiate for more time off, delegate tasks within my relationship, perform acts of self-care, and institute timers on my social media? How, in other words, can I optimize myself to get those mundane tasks done and theoretically cure my burnout? As millennials have aged into our thirties, that’s the question we keep asking — and keep failing to adequately answer. But maybe that’s because it’s the wrong question altogether. [1]

Each daily task, job, extracurricular event, and hobby shares many of the same traits with one another. Bigger, more, faster, more, better, and more. Rarely is any daily occurrence simple, small, or inconsequential. And it’s beginning to show. If you’re reading this, you’re likely thriving in an environment where you Peloton or Tonal before work, Uber Black while answering emails on $2,000 MacBooks, micro-dose to become “limitless,” intermittently fast to optimize for your fitness, and then work twelve hour days to pay for those $3,500 monthly leases. Frankly, we are all burnt out. And there is a connection; brands are beginning to reflect the empathy towards this behavioral undercurrent.

It’s easy to understand, then, why so many of us are so angry. The WeWork’s of the world were built on an ethos of positive vibes and unity — replete with what tech analyst Ranjan Roy calls “high-minded, burning man-esque self-actualization language” that, today, feels offensively out of sync with people’s lived realities. So why would Pattern, or any company that applies a superficial layer of burnout-conscious buzzwords to its products, be different? [2]

Consumer psychology involves the interest in lifestyle, behavior, and habit. It’s an all-encompassing study that considers our idiosyncrasies, our temperaments, and even our subtle personality traits. These are the variables that influence our behaviors as consumers. Psychographic segmentation is the analysis of a consumer cohort’s lifestyle with the intent to create a detailed profile. [3]

Pattern Brands, the group behind Gin Lane (RIP), is at the forefront of this trend identification. The legendary creative agency that developed the mold for millennial consumption by advising Hims, Harrys, Dia & Co, Ayr, Bonobos, Shinola, Stadium Goods, and Rockets of Awesome is pulling back on the messaging that influenced the “business cycle of more.” With a bit of hindsight, it makes sense that Recess and Haus were two of Gin Lane’s final DTC projects. It’s as if they were telegraphing their plans to focus on a new era of messaging by concluding their successful run with two “mindful” brands.

What does this mean for DTC brands?

In the last months, Everlane launched its impact-free shoe, Allbirds released a Rothy’s look-alike, Rhone launched a credible competitor to Mizzen+Main and Ministry. And Away began laying the groundwork for a consumer packaged goods (CPG) operation. It was once common for brands to believe that they could build a defensible growth path by identifying one product-need and one consumer identity. [4]

Scale fast, scale there, scale now. This is the executive mantra of many of today’s top digitally brands. Many product manufacturers began with a single, key product. They then expanded into a growth path befitting that of a traditional category brand. Though, most DTCs have done so prematurely. In contrast, successful traditional brands expanded beyond their initial focus after a decade or more in business.  In this era of retail, the move from product-to-category happens in just a few years. Founders hire product talent to stay atop a growing diversity of SKUs – many of which were barely intended upon the start. Imagine a shoe company designing luggage or a luggage company designing dress shirts, for instance. For a generation of consumers, the business cycle of more isn’t just student loans, rising rents, or WeWork’s demise. It’s also representative of the brands that we consume. Every brand seems to be out to get bigger, faster, and stronger – a subsconscious reminder that we are to do the same. This is beginning to change.

In a recent conversation between AdWeek’s Ann-Marie Alcántara and I, we discussed these concepts in a marathon of off-the-record discussion. To combat the hyper-growth narrative required to achieve venture funding, the early stages of  today’s upstart brand would resemble more of a publisher or community than a retailer. The rationale is simple: a customer is fleeting, a community lasts. This is most often reflected by brands with stronger organic presences. Brooklinen is the example of the hour.

Brooklinen: A “Bedroom” Brand

No longer just a bedding brand, Brooklinen wants to own the bedroom much like Away aims to own travel. Their strategies diverge from there. Brooklinen is in a class of digitally native bedding companies to include: Parachute Home, Buffy, and Hill House Home Inc. Founded in 2014, the company reported nearly $60 million in 2018 sales; the wife-husband duo has only raised $10 million to date, a capital constraint that likely influenced their growth path from product company to category presence. In this case, capital constraint proved an effective growth mechanism.

Screen Shot 2019-10-28 at 3.51.34 PM
From: earthy-minimalist at Brooklinen

In contrast with many of today’s top digitally native brands, cofounders Rich and Vicki Fulop shunned the traditional “category expansion” playbook in favor of a two-way marketplace format that compliments the aforementioned trend undercurrents.  Consumers will reward the brands that offer value without trying to do it all. As such, the launch of the Spaces marketplace gained wide media attention thanks to savvy messaging from the founding team and public relations work by Ogilvy’s Lindsey Martinez, Brooklinen’s public relations firm on record.

Spaces will feature 100 products by 12 partner brands (in addition to the total 89 products created by Brooklinen). Designers will include some independent artisans, as well as recognized brands such as Simply Framed, The Sill, Floyd and Dims, among others. [5]

The launch piqued the curiosity of a number of industry observers who weren’t yet familiar with Brooklinen’s marketplace partner RevCascade or the SaaS company’s tech stack. Rather than expanding beyond the brand’s 89 SKUs by developing or white labeling other in-category products, Brooklinen partnered with RevCascade to launch a two-sided marketplace. With a monthly average of 600,000 – 650,000 visitors with purchase intent, offering complimentary products from fashionable brands like The Sill accomplishes a few things: it monetizes existing traffic while rounding out the consumer’s interpretation of how Brooklinen fits within their lives.

Brooklinen expanding to a marketplace isn’t necessarily a new concept, according to Web Smith, the founder of retail research platform and community 2PM. It’s what Smith calls linear commerce, in which a brand uses an existing audience to monetize further revenue, growth and traffic. [6]

Is Brooklinen any less of a category brand than Casper? The short answer is no. In fact, the market may reward the bedding company for its two-way market strategy. RevCascade provided the tools necessary for Brooklinen to launch a hybrid marketplace that featured (1) wholesale (2) direct (3) and drop-shipped merchandise. In this way, Brooklinen’s approach is reflective of the Law of Linear Commerce.

With so many new brands in different categories, it’s difficult for any company to “cut through the clutter,” Fulop said.

Brooklinen’s founding team paired an existing audience (of 600k MAU) with an additional commerce opportunity. In their case, they did so without any additional hiring, development, or marketing hindrances associated with new product launches. With their approach, they offer new products while maintaining their focus on the production of quality textiles.

In a comment to 2PM: Josh Wexler, cofounder of RevCascade:

RevCascade enables any retailer, eCommerce merchant, or publisher to launch their own curated marketplace or dropship program to elevate their brand, better serve their consumers, and generate new revenue with zero inventory risk. Brooklinen’s approved brands (aka sellers or suppliers) use RevCascade’s “onboarding wizard” to create their profile, upload inventory, and set shipping preferences. In parallel, by leveraging RevCascade’s automated Shopify integration for product data, inventory updates, and transaction data, Brooklinen was able to launch their marketplace in less than 30 days

Anchored by a strong affinity for the company’s core products, Brooklinen gained a competitive advantage by both measures: DTC and marketplace. Consider Verishop, a popular, well-led, and well-capitalized marketplace that launched in July of 2019:

[table id=49 /]

Whether we are discussing Pattern Brands’ approach to remedying burnout culture or the cycle of more’s influence on an ever-crowded market of high-growth brands, Brooklinen’s partnership with RevCascade may serve as a path forward for many of their counterparts. Consumers have grown weary of companies that are looking to grow for the sake of growth. To these consumers, it’s a reminder of their own fast-paced, high-pressured lives.

Consumerism will always exist in some form or the other, but the clutter of brands looking to grow to the next milestone may fall out of grace with many. From Marie Kondo to Core Meditation, clutter culture has become a catalyst for burnout remedies. Experiences that provide ease, value, and simplicity will be rewarded in today’s market. It is a brand’s responsibility to contribute to the solution and not to the cycle of more.

Read the No. 336 curation here.

Report by Web Smith and edited by Tracey Wallace | About 2PM

第 335 期商人阶层

 

The rebuttal that you’ll typically hear is: “eCommerce is not blue collar.” It’s a refrain tweeted from the 20th floors of urban sprawls. On those floors, you’ll find dual-monitored workspaces adjacent to espresso machines and collagen bars. But for Jerry M. of Pickerington, Ohio, his opinion differs.

He’s been a four year member of Amazon’s third shift at its CMH2 facility. With his trusty Fitbit, he measures his nightly activity. His all-time goal is a little over 17,000 steps for the day, though the 57 year old typically falls around 12,000 – 13,000. An impressive number, his picking and packing statistics are even more impressive. On any given night, his fulfillment center is one of Central Ohio’s most prolific. And that’s saying quite a bit. Jerry’s no stranger to hard work, he is a former maintenance man who took the opportunity to grow with Amazon’s exploding logistics-side business. It paid far better.

Central Ohio is a bastion of third-party logistics centers and fulfillment warehouses. Name a digitally native brand and they will likely have a presence in the area. It was my first experience within the walls of one of those retailers that changed my perception of commerce altogether. At 26, I began in the marketing department of Rogue, a now-gargantuan online retailer that employs hundreds of machinists, warehouse workers, packaging engineers, and front office developers and executives. The employees and contractors now sit (or stand) within 900,000 square feet near Downtown Columbus. But on my first two days with the company, I passed the hours in the warehouse moving 40 pound boxes. On the second day, I wore comfortable shoes.

To the marketers, developers, and managers – they are online retail. They are what makes the engine move. And for a time, this was true. Commerce investments like recruiting engineering teams, advertising talent, server space, able creatives, and copywriting mavens rounded out the major spend. Leaders would spend heavily on the front-end, not the back-end. Commerce was pixels, not forklifts. But to those building packaging, operating forklifts, moving goods to trucks, they were commerce. To them, the front office folks were the replaceable ones.

Commoditization of the Front End

The front-end product side of online retail is quickly commoditizing. You have Shopify and Magento, of course. But then, there are solutions for every corner for the ecosystem; these innovations grow by the quarter. There are legacy partners like Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA), Adobe, BigCommerce, Square, Oracle, SalesForce, and WooCommerce. And there are new and innovative no-code options like Webflow Commerce and Storefronts by Elliot, a new plug and play product that launched to much fanfare on Product Hunt. With storefronts, you don’t need many of the front office folks that were required just eight years ago. The constraint is now warehouse logistics, and Shopify saw that before any of its competitors. The labor is the hard part.

The foresight by Shopify’s management team couldn’t have been better-timed.

Despite the front-end component of online retail commoditizing more and more each day, eCommerce is mainly discussed within the confines of code and pixels. But if you’ve ever had to build something, you’re just as grateful for the UPS employee as you are to the front-end developer. Online retail is a blue collar industry built on accessible tech. When Shopify launched into the third-party logistics (3PL) industry earlier this year, it raised eyebrows. Critics suggested that Shopify was losing its focus. Many of the questions centered around matters of optics: Can they maintain efficiency across hundreds of warehouses? Do they understand the difficulty? Will it lower their net promoter score? And don’t they know that they’re a software company?

Unpacking the next battle

It’s the third question that is at the crux of it all. Shopify has a decade-long history of enabling storefronts for tens of thousands of traditional and digitally native retailers. It has been, in effect, a publisher. Over that span of time, the company has added retail operations: omni-channel inventory tracking, point of sale hardware, and now shipping and logistics. The retailer’s primary user base (Shopify account holders) benefits from the company’s growing list of core competencies. [1]

Sitting with Shopify founder and CEO Tobi Lütke in his Ottawa office and one line of thought stood above the rest. I cared more about the enterprise names in commerce than he did. I found that to be confusing at first. Within the Shopify solar system, Plus is its own planet. It operates out of a different city. The cultures between offices are wildly different. One is low key, the other has a dash of braggadocio. But for Lütke, Shopify doesn’t exist for the sake of Shopify Plus. In fact, one could argue that it’s the other way around. Shopify Plus helps Shopify build more tools for the common merchant. To the Ottawa-based CEO, helping mom and pop shops and millennial side hustles is where the action is. Engineering is no longer the bottleneck, in this respect. There are a dozen options if a merchant would like to sell a product and accept payment.

Shopify plans to spend $1 billion on its fulfillment network through 2023, and Wong writes that his research shows that “there is enough merchant discontent with Amazon and sufficient inefficiencies in the logistics workflow to innovate upon, that Shopify could eventually compete against” the e-commerce giant. [2]

But it’s become abundantly clear that, at some point, Shopify’s business needed to shift from the theoretical to the practical – from bits to boxes. If every merchant can find a storefront, Shopify’s original vision is no longer enough. This week, Shopify officially closed acquisition of 6 River Systems for $450 million in a cash and stock deal.

By equipping independent warehouses and 3PLs with task-augmenting robotics, it frees up workforces to do more, faster.

Shopify expects this move to support on-site employees with their daily tasks, such as inventory replenishment, picking, sorting and packing, as well as increase the speed and reliability of its warehouse operations. [3]

This long-term investment was key to Shopify’s strategy. By improving efficiency through out hundreds of warehouses, Shopify is growing capacity at 3PLs. Not only does this lower the costs of shipping, it also increases success rates. Ask any top 3PL if they’d onboard a small business doing less than $300,000 per year; the answer will be “come back when you’ve grown.” If top 3PLs do accept small retailers like these, the costs are disproportionate. The concern and care is minimal. In an industry where top performing 3PLs gross $200 million or more, $100,000 accounts are a strain. But until recently, there was no efficient funnel to help small merchants attract the business of independently owned, small cap 3PLs like Ohio’s Ships-A-Lot.

The average DTC founder spends 20-30% of her time dealing with shipping concerns while managing scale and expectations. Lütke is democratizing third party logistics for all merchants, not just ones at the enterprise levels. By increasing optionality and making the investments into robotics and data systems to lower costs – more merchants, small retailers, and early-stage DTC brands may finally be able to utilize 3PL services earlier in their life cycles. In 2004, Shopify launched products that made founders reconsider hiring full-time engineers. With innovations like no-code platforms, online retail has come a long way since those days. Third-party logistics for smaller merchants is just the latest in the line of pain points that Shopify is well-positioned to address for the merchant class.

Some will argue that eCommerce isn’t blue collar, Shopify’s actions suggest otherwise. For employees like Jerry and the hundreds of thousands of other warehouse workers spread throughout the exurban office parks of America, they see themselves as the center of the eCommerce universe. And rightfully so. Products are picked, packed, and moved by hard-working, tireless people. Retail is the movement of physical goods that require enormous amounts of physical labor to arrive faster and faster to your doors. And so, eCommerce isn’t just a front office job anymore. Of course, many merchants will tell you that it never really was.

Report by Web Smith and edited by Tracey Wallace | About 2PM

第 334 期书信的现实意义

BoF

本周, 《大西洋月刊》(The Atlantic)的凯特琳-蒂芙尼(Kaitlyn Tiffany)撰写了一篇关于通讯行业历史的报道,内容细致入微,很有价值。历史的长短取决于你问的是谁。对于她的观点,Substack 希望你相信他们的团队开创了这一运动。她正确地认为,他们已经成功地为不同的受众进行了调整。他们很可能会取得巨大的、长期的成功。只要看一眼 Substack 的付费排行榜屏幕,你就会明白作者自始至终提出的观点。她在文章中写道

安-弗里德曼(Ann Friedman)说:"[时事通讯]已经成为一种事物,"她自 2013 年起开始撰写每周时事通讯,拥有 40,000 名订阅者,被公认为第一波时事通讯热潮的领军人物之一。

蒂芙尼的文章在很多方面都与我一段时间以来的一些想法有关。她恰如其分地指出,虽然安德森-霍洛维茨(Andreessen Horowitz)对 Substack 的 1530 万美元投资标志着一个开端,但对于其他群体来说,它已成为让时事通讯 "变酷 "的有用工具。她逐条介绍了通讯行业历史上一些最重要的名字。这份报告值得您花时间阅读。

在九月份的 "Destination D2C"展会的后台,十几位同行聚在一起畅谈职业世界,我们每个人都以自己的方式追求着这份激情。我们每个人都有一些共同点,但最重要的是对直接面向消费者行业的兴趣。现在,凯特琳-蒂芙尼(Kaitlyn Tiffany)在《现代零售》(Modern Retail)杂志的《DTC 兄弟的崛起》(The Rise of the DTC Bro)一书中纪念了这一重要时刻。凯尔-魏斯曼首先发言:

首先是奢侈品时事通讯《Lean Luxe》的创始人保罗-蒙福德(Paul Munford)和网站 2PM 的创始人韦伯-史密斯(Web Smith),后者与 Haus 的创始人兼首席执行官海伦娜-普莱斯-汉布雷希特(Helena Price Hambrecht)坐在一起。然后是 DTC 战略家兼顾问马可-马兰迪兹(Marco Marandiz),他坐下来和大家一起讨论他们的客户。之后,在 Twitter 上自称 "DTC 达人 "的 Nik Sharma 也加入了讨论。

也许,《现代零售业》的记者没有看到的是,在那个场景中,在座的每一位成员都忍受着不相称的拒绝。海伦娜-普莱斯-汉伯瑞希特(Helena Price Hambrecht)是一位著名的直接面向消费者的创始人,她最初是一名创意人员。Hambrecht 本身就是一位沟通大师。

她很快就证明了自己,但对于我们这些在瓶子发货前就认识她的人来说,她已经得到了证明。

但在此之前 Haus推出之前,她共同创立的品牌面临着一场艰苦的战斗。没有人愿意资助她的想法。早期,记者们私下对她的理念和方法大加挞伐。我个人知道,为了完成 100 万美元的种子轮融资,她投了 500 多次。这是一个非常高的失败率。传统风险投资人考虑的因素有:地域、行业、年龄、性别等等。模式匹配提供了安慰和一点保险。Hambrecht 并不符合模式匹配。不过,她募集的下一轮资金将在几天内完成。Haus创始人海伦娜-普莱斯(HelenaPrice)在给 2PM 的评论中写道:

我们的第一个 100 万美元花了 8 个月的时间和大约 500 次推销。我们听到了很多拒绝。我们经历了许多黑暗和怀疑的时刻。话虽如此,但如果你真的相信你所做的东西会有受众,你也会在风险投资中找到这些人。我现在告诉正在融资的人,他们可能还没见过 90% 最终会投资他们的人。你只需不断获得介绍和发送冷邮件,最终就会找到你的人。

她很快就证明了自己,但对于我们这些在瓶子发货前就认识她的人:什么都没变,她已经被证明了。她只是不符合零售业管理者和制造商的想法。至于电子商务行业的领导者或思想家,我们坐在后台的人中也很少有人符合这种模式。马兰迪兹、夏尔马、芒福德和我都不是商业和媒体行业高层资源的原型。在这份业内人士名单上,你找不到我们中的任何一个人。不过,名单上有几位成员订阅了《2PM》或《Lean Luxe》。

在一个对那些不按常理出牌的人的贡献视而不见的行业里,通讯运动提供了一个平台。我们每个人在这一时刻分享的东西都被这段话记录了下来。在成为出版商之前,我们都曾是经营者:创始人、董事、经理、建设者。这些来之不易的经验是推动我们个人项目前进的风。

曾任Hint Water(后为 Vaynermedia)电子商务总监的夏尔马经常与多产的大卫-佩雷尔(David Perell)合作撰稿。芒福德(Munford)的职业是公共关系主管,他在 2PM 推出几个月后就创办了Lean Luxe。马可-马兰迪兹(Marco Marandiz)在推特上发表了对Away和Glossier等DTC品牌的分析文章,一举成名。他在HomeAway负责产品时就开始这样做了。在我为媒体刊物《Gear Patrol》和《Uncrate》管理商务之前,我与他人共同创办了Mizzen + Main。不过,这些资历往往还是不够的。

358225C3-66C6-4B54-894E-979C7563A454 2
Sherrell Dorsey、Dan Runcie、QuHarrison Terry 和 Web Smith

就在三个月前,2PM 还参加了全国黑人记者协会(NABJ) 的专题讨论会,与会的还有成功的(利润丰厚的)时事通讯出版物:The PlugInevitable HumanTrapital。讨论的主题是 "建立付费订阅媒体公司"。但我们不难发现其中的共同点:如果没有通讯受众的临界质量,我们的想法很可能会被传统媒体通过与专业记者的现场或非现场对话进行重新包装。时事通讯出版商努力掌控其观点的传播及其周围的社区。

因此,当我读到《现代零售》的这篇文章时,我并没有感到不快。魏斯曼是一位伟大的作家,他可能没有恶意。但我感到困惑的是,为什么没有人看到我们所做的一切。我不确定许多读者是否理解我们当初坐在那里是多么自豪。就在三年前,那一幕还不会发生。对我来说,那一刻就像是莫大的荣幸。每一次,我们都找到了自己的方法,向竞争激烈的生态系统传递我们实用的、以经验为导向的想法。而在那一天, Yotpo的创始团队认识到了这一切的正确性。这是一个重要的时刻。

前子栈时代

目标:发表 180 封信。重新评估。 2015 年成立的 2PM 公司可谓是雪中送炭。那年 12 月,我不再共同经营 DTC 业务。相反,我开始为出版商提供建议和/或建立电子商务运营。作为一个副业,我创办了2pml.com,以此来对自己负责。

2PM 的主张很简单:了解一切,才能更好地做好一件事。

我想在自己的专业领域做得更好。当时,我只专注于一项任务,导致盲点多于实际进步。因此,我错过了在阅读、思考和认真分析之后获得的实用知识。第一封 2PM 电子邮件发布给了 11 个人;出于需要,我在发出 180 封邮件后将其货币化。建立这家公司成了我的全职工作。

通过了解 2PM 与商业相关的行业如何相互作用,对彼此产生消极或积极的影响,我能够为我所参与的项目规划出最佳步骤--无论当时还是现在。通过 2PM,我希望能为其他行业的同行复制同样的能力。这是个简单的命题:了解一切,以影响那一件事。

如果说蒂芙尼的《有人会靠电子邮件通讯致富吗? [1]一书中可能存在的盲点。现在有越来越多的前经营者把大部分时间花在磨练出版技能上。他们了解商业、营销、品牌、物流和数据科学。他们运送过包裹,洽谈过分销协议,领导过绩效营销工作。而读者似乎也会被这些在围墙内讨论行业的人的原始视角所吸引。无论您是在阅读艾米丽-辛格(Emily Singer)的《Chips and Dip》、马格达莱纳-卡拉(Magdalena Kala)的《Retales》、里奇-西格尔(Richie Siegel)的《 Loose Threads》、珍妮-吉兰德(Jenny Gyllander)的《Thing Testing》,还是保罗-蒙福德(Paul Munford)的《Lean Luxe》,都能感受到运营经验的存在。

运营商优先的出版商

没错,Substack 在其 7 月 17 日的博客 "更好的新闻史"中遗漏了相关历史。当然,他们强调了本-汤普森(Ben Thompson)和杰西卡-莱辛(Jessica Lessin)这两位独立付费订阅行业的名人。但 Substack 可能忽略了另一个趋势。Substack 在向出版业致敬的最后写道

纽约太阳报》创刊至今已有 184 年,我们正站在新闻行业新革命的风口浪尖。哀悼旧媒体模式失落的时代已经过去。现在是展望未来两个世纪的时候了。

这场革命本身并不新鲜。但它正在影响那些寻求平台以推动行业发展的新型思想家。它会让出版商致富吗?也许会,也许不会。但作为一个平台,出版与单独发送新闻简报完全不同。吉兰德刚刚完成了一轮规模可观的天使投资,投资方包括硅谷的众多精英。她的订阅方式新鲜、可信、吸引人。西格尔刚刚成功举办了为期一天的零售业会议,如果没有他的《Loose Threads》时事通讯,这次会议就不会举行。Munford 每次举办Lean Luxe社交活动时都会爆满。虽然这不是一个以订阅者为导向的付费平台(暂时如此),但他已成功地通过每周赞助实现了盈利。此外,2PM正在为商业和媒体高管推出首个会员制论坛:Polymathic。每家公司都面临着巨大的机遇。

运营商优先的出版商时代令人目不暇接。从某种程度上说,它正在为媒体界创造一个公平的竞争环境。但是,在 Yotpo 的豪华会场后厅的一张桌子上,有一群人无疑脱颖而出--无论从字面上还是从形象上。我们的举止与众不同,我们的外表也与众不同。商业相关媒体中的非传统声音正在对传统媒体圈产生积极影响。我们希望,这些由新闻通讯转变而来的平台能继续为成熟的数字行业高层提供新思路。2PM 再次观察到一场来自内部的静悄悄的运动。

点击这里阅读第 334 期策划

Web Smith 报道 Tracey Wallace 编辑 |About 2PM