备忘录DoorDash 操作系统

DoorDash has an opportunity to power an evolved, local commerce economy where urbanization has taken a back seat to remote work, the homestead is more relevant than ever before, and the “arming of the rebels” has yet to capture the imagination of Main Street businesses. This is bigger than late night takeout: Food delivery is to DoorDash what book sales were to Amazon.

A singular failure has shaped my understanding of commerce and how digital would influence physical retail. In 2014, eCommerce accounted for just 7.7% of US retail sales, the investment into urbanization had a positive trajectory, and apps like Postmates and DoorDash had begun to eat market share of incumbents like Grubhub. With that backdrop, a close friend and I pieced together a mobile application with a simple marketplace function. It featured an open chat room to guide users through recommendations, sales, and checkout.

The experiment had one goal: To understand if eCommerce could improve the viability of local, analog retail businesses. To do so, we targeted hard goods (not food products). We built atop Uber’s then-available pricing API and enabled independent retailers to market their products within our app and ship products as far as 20 miles outside of the city. Uber’s drivers delivered the goods to their homes.

To accomplish this, we indexed the goods of independent retailers and tracked inventory with a relatively light integration that relied on imported Quickbooks data. And then each product’s corresponding image was pulled into the app through .JSON web calls. Given that the vast majority of featured stores were within a mile of us, contractors were tasked with acquiring the goods and bringing them to a central location to stage for delivery by Uber. The last shipment left by the close of business and inventory was painstakingly updated upon the completion of each business day. In just under a year, the app sold $627,000 in top line sales at an average margin of around 17%.

That’s where the positives ended. The price of doing business with Uber was costly and the fleet of drivers was subpar, causing a number of customer service issues. The demand for hard goods was outpaced by the demand for perishable goods (food). And the area’s physical retail scene was a draw, so most consumers opted to walk, drive, or bike over instead. The app eventually amounted to an expensive experiment in between jobs.

The Difference: Now and Then

The experiment wasn’t a complete failure, however. By the time that we shut the application down, we’d developed a better understanding of the intersections between real estate, retail, technology, and the limitations of small businesses. I also learned an important lesson about eCommerce adoption: 2014 was far too early. Today, the former 7.7% share of retail (in 2014) sales has tripled. Nearly one of every four dollars is spent online in 2020.

Given that our focus was on non-coastal markets and second-tier cities, the marketplace helped us understand the needs of retailers outside of the country’s main retail hubs: Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, and so on. The app experience was nowhere near perfect, but the experiment was valuable. I went on to build DTC brands, founding 2PM Inc just a year later. That friend of mine became the founder of Loop Returns.

Fast forward and many of the retailers who once considered eCommerce a distraction have now invested heavily into building online retail as a primary channel. Consider Josh Quinn of Ohio’s Tiger Tree, a multi-million dollar independent retailer and former partner of our app experiment. Quinn recently shuttered Tiger Tree’s doors to pursue an eCommerce-first strategy. He said:

It’s an interesting example of just how fast retail has accelerated in six years. To say I don’t think my customers would have seen the utility in an on-demand delivery solution seems laughable now. But we could have been better positioned. We did so well as brick-and-mortar stores that it kept us from investing the way we should have. It hurts to think of where we’d be if we would have put the time into eCommerce back then.

Quinn is representative of a large swath of retailers who relied upon a brick-and-mortar business before the pandemic. But he won’t make the mistake again. He added: “We are in the middle of local online retail being a thing. Almost half of our eCommerce orders go to the Columbus, Ohio area.”

This is the new economy that DoorDash is primed to capture. The permanence of remote work culture and the restrictions placed on urban dining and nightlife has spawned three separate trends. There is a shift from major cities to smaller ones, urban flight to suburban “cities”, and housing to the all-encompassing homestead.

Sanitized urbanization removes the perceived risks of living in urban areas while adding the value of – what’s often – upgraded infrastructure, improved schools, and lower tax bases. [2PM, 1]

As remote work and distance learning continues to become more commonplace, entertainment, commerce, and utility will shift from physical to digital as well. There has been an extraordinary shift from thinking along the lines of office perks to thinking about optimizing the home. Consider Wayfair’s sudden shift of fortune. In 2017, the furniture reseller traded at a $5 billion market cap. Today it trades at nearly $26 billion, a growth emblematic of a boom in redesigning the home for modern needs: remote work, leisure, and comfort.

If this is any indication of how small business owners will react to these macroeconomic changes, we can expect second and third-order effects in the housing market to continue to materialize.

Inside The Home

Like Postmates, which has long tested hard goods marketplace capabilities, DoorDash’s opportunity lies with supporting the businesses of independent retailers by providing new opportunity for them. Not just by delivering the goods but by fostering a marketplace that expands their reach to wider, local audiences. By streamlining retailers as sources of goods and developing new initiatives to reach customers, their marketplace partners will be more inclined to view DoorDash as an effective customer acquisition engine.

A possible future as DoorDash embraces the shift to the homestead (and innovative demand-gen partnerships).

Success or failure will depend on growth beyond food delivery as the core model. This means that the development of efficient customer acquisition, fair and incentivized pay for its last-mile workforce, and paths to hyper growth in gross merchandising volume are key to the company’s long term viability. Consider this excerpt from a recent analysis on DoorDash:

That inability to change the business model is also likely to keep DoorDash from making any meaningful profit. Grubhub, the only US food delivery service on the stock market, recently complained that food delivery is not enough to build a sustainable and profitable business. [2]

By instituting a local marketplace model, DoorDash would encourage retailers like Quinn who find value in reaching more customers in their cities without relying upon the postal service for delivery. Quinn cited his frustration with existing local shipping models:

Independent retailers like us are facing something of a crisis with USPS shipments being delayed. Not that I am blaming them – I understand the strains on their system.

Amazon Prime has popularized next day and same day delivery. Services like HBO Max have begun to shift resources away from physical theaters and towards home-streaming models. And founded a year before our local commerce experiment, DoorDash is now trading at $55.6 billion. Like Jeff Bezos former marketplace of books, Tony Xu’s marketplace of local retailers is in its infancy. While intended for restaurants, the technology could easily be applied to retailers. And while DoorDash touts partnerships with large and sophisticated companies (Macy’s, etc), the delivery app’s real opportunity lies with locally-owned retailers who’d rely on DoorDash for the technical expertise and the audience to grow their businesses – a model that not even Shopify could compete with right now.

In its short existence, DoorDash has evolved well beyond just  delivery logistics, adding services like Storefront, which enables merchants to set up digital ordering directly from their native channels. [3]

We look at apps like DoorDash and see food delivery. Rather, view them as the last-mile enabler for businesses who are leaning into localized eCommerce. Food delivery, alone, will not justify the $50+ billion market cap but a city-by-city network of local retailers may. This is the eCommerce era now. Like every other retailer, DoorDash must learn to create new demand and service it with creative solutions. I suspect that the company’s reach will soon extend beyond your kitchen or your mobile phones. In the near future, the app may function more like a retail operating system.

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes | 艺术:亚历克斯-雷米 |关于 2PM

备忘录房间里最聪明的人

一直以来,我都认为 "表象"(Apophenia)是英语中最重要的词汇之一。它既是一种正常现象,也是一种不正常现象,取决于一个人的思维敏锐度,其内涵十分复杂。它是一种在不相关的想法之间找到有意义联系的能力。思想和群体是这一现象的燃料。

阿波菲尼亚在历史上的作用被低估了。启蒙时代推动人类以非凡的方式向前发展。这个时代的核心是欧洲咖啡馆的发明。在进口商品的咖啡因和文艺复兴时期酒精的熏陶下,学术和社会思想在以男性为主的房间里形成,他们铿锵有力、恪尽职守,仿佛这就是他们对社会的独特贡献。

欧洲咖啡馆或 "便士大学 "以大学独有的方式实现了信息合成的民主化。它促进了积极参与者和爱管闲事的听众之间的对话、辩论和著作权。思想是有价值的。想象一下,一艘船的船头附近出现轻微漏水。只有加固的木板才能提供船体所需的稳定性,以经受海上的考验和严酷的环境。启蒙时代的思想就像坚硬的适航木板一样,为他人建造的船体提供了支撑。一个人的想法成就了另一个人的想法。房间里最聪明的人很少能获得最终创造的功劳。但如果你在咖啡馆里待得足够久,你很可能会带着自己的创造离开。

从理论上讲,数字论坛就是这个时代的咖啡馆。18 世纪伦敦的 "便士大学 "曾经带来的启示就是今天共享知识的数字社区。尼克-德维尔德(Nick deWilde)在《有影响力社区的社会架构》一书中解释道:

个人通常会 "雇佣 "社区来完成需要人际交往的过渡。一位初创企业的创始人希望成为一名更好的领导者,他申请加入 "科技领袖",以获得专业成长所需的真诚反馈。

这也是思想有价值的部分原因:它们可以发挥社区的功能。思想可以凝固成一个坚硬的整体,能够让另一艘船继续航行。然而,"想法并不重要 "的观点却在文章中层出不穷。这些睿智的作家会继续解释说,如果你不能执行这些想法,你的文字或思想就缺乏价值。这些作者推崇执行的价值。毫无疑问,喧嚣文化也是如此。因此,我不敢苟同。

想想已故的美国古生物学家、生物学家和科学史家斯蒂芬-古尔德(Stephen Gould):

我的天赋是建立联系。这也是我成为散文家的原因。这也是我的技术作品结构如此的原因。蜗牛壳的各个部分是如何相互作用的?生长速度如何?你能看出其中的规律吗?我一直试图在这片森林中找到规律,我很高兴我能做到这一点。......我可以坐下来,就任何主题想出大约 20 个与之相关的事物,而且这些事物之间并没有虚假的联系。

古尔德花了很多年才意识到这是一种技能。有时,房间里最聪明的人是那些能够思考社会问题、行业缺陷或改变游戏规则的创新的人。这些想法会出现在主流新闻媒体、规模庞大的推特上,或者出现在那些不需要说明从哪里听来的重复段子的行业领袖们的视野中。因为这些创意,新闻媒体获得了更多的点击率,推特上的粉丝越来越多,行业领袖们也因此获得了报酬。那么,为什么有些创意者需要通过执行来证明自己的价值,而另一些创意者却仅仅因为找到了受众而赢得了认知价值呢?

驾驭创意并将其转化为发明、基础设施、产品或艺术的能力是一种罕见的技能,应当受到重视。这是肯定的。但这样做的机会并不总是平均分配的。许多最优秀的思想家本身就是建设者,但由于种种原因,他们的想法并不总是归功于他们自己。

时代的传播媒介对思想的归属起着相当大的作用。

最著名的希腊人是演说家。美国殖民时代的领袖们写下了大量论文和书信。亚历山大-汉密尔顿是历史上最多产的创作者之一,他在 1788 年至 1789 年间写了 85 篇文章和随笔。20 世纪初,无线电广播兴起。富兰克林-D-罗斯福利用收音机对美国人进行指导和激励,从而超越了以往大多数总统发表讲话的影响力。20 世纪 60 年代,电视登上舞台中央。英俊的约翰-肯尼迪在电视辩论中一举夺魁,而对于大多数收听广播的人来说,理查德-尼克松则是胜利者。

本世纪初,互联网开创了新型思想领袖的先河。如今,我们正处于文字媒体的崛起阶段,无论是通过 Twitter 还是通讯。曾经在欧洲咖啡馆兴盛一时的那些方法,如今也在 Reddit、Twitter、Substack、Slack 和私人论坛等平台上得以延续。

本着彰显最聪明人的精神,以下是 2PM 生态系统中的一些企业领导者、高管和顾问,他们拥有推动行业发展的想法。

2018 年,当娜杰-奥斯汀(Naj Austin)在艾瑟尔俱乐部(Ethel's Club)上下注时,她本应可以根据 "边缘人群应该有一个具有社区意识的聚集地 "这一想法轻松筹到资金。同年,The Wing 筹集到了 1.17 亿美元,用于扩大对核心人群的服务,而奥斯汀基本上是在勉力支撑着她的创意集。

奥斯汀给我留下的最深刻印象是,当大流行病开始在 2020 年初扰乱像她和 The Wing 这样的实体零售企业时,她有能力转向为 Ethel's Club 社区提供数字服务。奥斯汀的灵活性带来了回报,她目前正在为她的下一个创业项目 "Somewhere Good "筹集资金。

您可以在 Twitter 上关注Naj 的想法

在布列塔尼-查韦斯(Brittany Chavez)拥有一个可持续发展的电子商务平台来建立自己的市场之前,她就已经提出了为她的社区提供资源的想法 "拉丁裔购物",并与她的联合创始人迈尔斯-蒙特斯(Miles Montes)围绕这个想法建立了自己的受众群。他们的 Instagram 账户已经拥有超过 6 万名粉丝和顾客,被媒体称为 "拉美人的 Etsy"。Morning Brew 的 Halie LeSavage 解释了为什么她的 Techstars 支持的创业项目能够成功:

正如 2020 年不断提醒我们的那样,Z 世代和千禧一代在购物时坚持自己的价值观。拉美裔购物者是一个强大的消费群体:根据尼尔森公司的数据,到 2023 年,他们将带动美国超过 1.9 万亿美元的消费。[2]

如果说我从查韦斯身上学到了什么,那就是:她坚韧不拔,她不达目的誓不罢休,她欢迎他人的想法,她给予他人应有的赞誉。她的 6 万多名消费者和粉丝都会同意她的观点。

您可以在 Twitter 上关注布列塔尼的想法(在 Twitter 修复她的原始账户之前,您可以在这里关注她的想法)。

我第一次见到 Sherrell 是在 2018 年于佛罗里达州迈阿密举行的全国黑人记者协会会议上。我们和 Trapital 的丹-伦西(Dan Runcie)坐在一起,向一小群与会者阐述了各自的想法和对独立媒体公司的期望。当时,她的最新企业 The Plug 还处于起步阶段。如今,它已成为技术领域最值得依赖的行业资源之一。请看西雅图时报 2020 年 8 月的这篇报道。

多尔西说,她没想到自己的时事通讯会自成一个媒体业务,但 "插头"(The Plug)--这个名字来源于一个俗语,指一个认识所有人、"无所不知 "的人--却一发不可收拾。

多尔西在解释她的论文时说,她获得了哥伦比亚大学新闻研究生院的数据新闻硕士学位,主要研究数据如何帮助 "更好地讲述技术领域代表性不足群体的故事"。[3]

Sherrell 正在打造人力资源领域最重要的公司之一。虽然现在每家科技公司都想聘请她,但我认为她独立创业的影响力会更大。

您可以在 Twitter 上关注Sherrell 的想法

格蕾丝-加西亚-克拉克(Grace Garcia Clarke)因在著名的德瑞斯公关公司(Derris PR Agency)创办了盈利性内容部门而声名鹊起,她是公关公司与媒体交叉领域中最具好奇心和自由思想的人之一。我们的第一次互动是2019年12月在保罗-蒙福德(Paul Munford)的Lean Luxe社区中就Peloton广告失败的利弊及其对公司命运的影响展开的辩论。

她曾是德瑞斯公司的一名特工,现在独立工作,备受青睐。各品牌会利用她的沟通能力、行业研究能力和洞察力来了解那些呆板的商人所不了解的东西。例如,她为《纽约杂志》的《战略家》(The Strategist)撰写了一篇经过深入研究的产品综述,在这篇文章中,她听取了数十位 Z 世代 TikTok 用户的意见,发表了该刊物转化率最高的文章之一。

没有什么产品能比美容产品在 TikTok 上卖得更快了,无论是 DIY 眉毛贴膜套装、男士剃须粉,还是只需 1 美元的沐浴露。为了弄清哪些东西不负众望,我们花了几个小时与 TikTok 的影响者交换了数百条 DM。[4]

当她被赋予为合作公司做决定的自主权时,这些公司都会从中受益。我应该知道,她经常与 2PM 合作。

您可以在 Twitter 上关注格蕾丝的想法

Andrea Hernández 是一位消费包装商品专家。她与Snaxshot的合作是她长期坚持的想法的成果:对食品和消费包装品趋势背后的数据进行编辑。埃尔南德斯是洪都拉斯科尔特斯省圣佩德罗苏拉市人,我亲眼目睹了她的受众围绕着Snaxshot开始超越其利基市场。埃尔南德斯还是Mood Food Snacks 的创始人,因此她对更大的市场有着敏锐的洞察力。Morning Brew》杂志最近的一篇报道介绍了她在大流行时期及以后围绕中央产品和分销提出的想法:

我们将看到 "黑店 "的崛起,比如亚马逊(Amazon)最近在布鲁克林推出了第一家只提供在线服务的全食超市(Whole Foods),该超市只专注于完成在线食品杂货订单;DoorDash 也推出了DashMart。[5]

当她撰写有关 CPG 的文章时,我都会倾听。她的观点非常有价值,Snaxshot 将因此而成长。

您可以在 Twitter 上关注Andrea 的想法

这样的例子不胜枚举。观念 被误解。早期互联网时代的最大受众是战利品的胜利者,而通讯时代的核心则是新思想。模式匹配的惯例正慢慢让位于思想者的优点。

当然,优秀的、可盈利的创意仍会被主流媒体过滤和报道。CNBC、《时尚》杂志和《洛杉矶时报》将继续为小读者的作品争光。但如果说我注意到了一件事,那就是这个时代已经开始缩短敏锐思想的原创者与希望听到这些思想的广大受众之间的距离。

这样一来,创意就变得前所未有的珍贵,因为人们不再认为创意是二元对立的--它从来就不是二元对立的。没有创意者和执行者之分。相反,创意存在于一个范围内,新奇的想法可以带来机遇。这些无形资产现在比以往任何时候都更像一种货币。现在是时候了,我们应该在最聪明的人还在蹒跚学步的时候,就开始认可他们。他们不会太久了。

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes | 艺术:亚历克斯-雷米 |关于 2PM

 

备忘录健康的愿望

纽约如此,其他零售业也是如此。在纽约市最富裕的街区,新的零售商正在向那些买得起的人敞开大门。这些店面设施齐全,散发着独一无二的光环,其设计目的并不是为了让商品平民化,而是为了达到相反的效果。翻阅 Instagram、TikTok、Snapchat 或其他社交平台,你可能会发现一些迹象,表明这种流行病对每个人的影响并不相同。你已经忠实地执行了近九个月的单独隔离。与此同时,你身边还在举行晚宴和其他高规格聚会。10 月份,金-卡戴珊(Kim Kardashian)与近 40 位朋友和家人分享了她成功度假的消息。

在经过两周的多次健康检查并要求所有人隔离之后,我给了我最亲密的核心圈子一个惊喜,那就是去一个私人岛屿旅行,在那里我们可以假装一切正常,只是短暂的片刻。[1]

当你独自一人吃着波德加蛋糕时,现代玛丽-安托瓦内特正在鲸鱼附近游泳,在海滩上看电影。财富是一种表达方式,最常见的是通过财产的视角来观察。但在大流行年,财富的首要表现形式仅仅是正常的生活。在《镀金时代 2.0》中,我解释道:

这个时代已经开始揭示出美国人在商品和服务消费方式上的鲜明对比。尽管商店倒闭的数量达到了灾难性的程度,但净消费仍在继续增长。零售业和媒体界的一些人悄然认识到,最具竞争力的增长方式是追求现代奢侈品消费者--这群人似乎不受这些变化的影响。产品变得更加独特,生产质量更高,服务也更加优质。[2PM, 2]

现代理想经济正在发生变化。社会学博士安娜-安杰里奇(Ana Andjelic)最近出版的《渴望的商业》一书解释了我们今天看到的现象:

现代理想经济的基础不是财产甚至经验的积累和展示,而是社会资本、环境信用和文化智慧。[......]现代资本还植根于 FOMO(害怕错过)。[......]社区中的成员身份,或在社交媒体上通过积累赞和粉丝来吸引和赢得关注的能力,都是一种地位。[3]

在纽约市富人区不断涌现的零售商不卖鞋子、皮包,甚至不卖名牌面膜。这些零售店距离大排长龙的 CityMD 只有几个街区之遥,销售的是无需等待的独家医疗服务。在蒙托克(Montauk)的冲浪小屋(Surf Lodge)等著名场所,方便快捷的快速检测是当今消费者可获得的最奢侈的产品。今年 8 月,《纽约时报 》写道

冲浪小屋(Surf Lodge)是进行冠状病毒快速检测比较容易的地方之一,这是位于纽约州蒙托克(Montauk)的一家酒店和餐厅,以接待和款待约翰-传奇(John Legend)和邦-乔维(Bon Jovi)等名人而闻名。[4]

11 月,您甚至不必前往蒙托克。您可以步行到纽约苏豪区的一家商店,花 450 美元坐在相对豪华的位置上等待命运的降临。整个过程不超过 15 分钟。

看哪,纽约市快速检测中心(Rapid Test NYC)。作为 City MD 的豪华替代品,这个闪亮的地方提供三种不同的测试,最快 15 分钟就能出结果,而且,对于这群人来说,"常旅客 "套餐还能打折,以防您因工作、学习、旅行或玩耍而需要经常接受测试。他们使用市场上最准确的快速检测机(准确率超过 95%),努力把安全放在首位,同时提供五星级服务。[5]

最新崛起的渴望类别是由分叉和流行所孕育的。快速检测的奢侈商业化实现了安杰里奇对新愿望的定义,同时又建立在旧愿望的基础上:奢侈品开发项目中零售地产的排他性。消费者购买的不仅仅是 450 美元的检测费用,他们购买的是正常生活的权利,哪怕只是参加一次社交活动。在当今的市场上,快速检测是唯一能让人们获得某种自由的消费品。要想在社交场合被人看到或听到,而不受他人侮辱性的目光注视,就必须使用这种准确率高达 95% 的检测仪。

正如奢侈品的发展趋势一样,将健康作为一种追求的产品将产生更广泛的影响。随着越来越多的零售商了解这种产品的需求曲线,更多的零售商将在现有店面内提供这种产品。在我们开始回归旧常态之前,对这种产品的投资有 6 到 12 个月的机会窗口。试想一下,在萨克斯第五大道(Saks Fifth Avenue)百货公司内快速试营业,或者在美国最好的购物中心内作为一个独立区域出现在这个先进的零售之都的边界之外。以类似的方式分发早期疫苗也不足为奇。如今,这种方式已经开始应用。像 Levels 这样的新时代健康技术公司与医生合作,提供直接面向消费者的产品,而这些产品过去只能凭处方购买。

这种零售趋势的保质期很短。当快速检测得到更广泛的普及时,其奢侈的吸引力就会消失。但是,对它们的需求可能会被对没有 CityMD 线的早期疫苗的需求所取代。这种奢华的窗口期更长。但正如安杰利奇所指出的,人们的愿望比以前更加社会化和精明。我们的生活就是为了记录我们的经历。随着 COVID 病例的增加,新的维布伦商品也将随之增加:社交生活。

令人向往的零售健康体验是 0.01% 的顶级人士早已熟知的。如今,前 1%的人正把它像 Birkin 手袋一样随身携带。意识的边缘是渴望的第一阶段。它将从苏荷区的街道扩散到纳什维尔、哥伦布和夏洛特的高档零售发展区。

作者:Web Smith | 艺术:Alex Remy | 编辑:Hilary Milnes编辑:Hilary Milnes 关于 2PM