第 306 期平台和光晕效应

The commerce platform report. The term “halo effect” was first coined by a psychologist in 1920. Edward Thorndike used the moniker to describe the methods that military officers used to assess the performance of their soldiers. These assessments often revealed little variance across the categories of performance. Either the soldiers were good or bad; few performance evaluations noted “good” performance in one respect and “bad” performance in another. It is said that the halo effect is influenced most by a person’s first impression. If we see them as bad, they can do no good. If we see them as good, they can do no ill. Today, this phrase is most-often applied to brands and their equity.


The halo effect is a type of immediate judgment discrepancy. It is the tendency for an impression that is created in one category to influence the opinions of impressions created in another category.


Shopify is seemingly everywhere. In December, Digiday’s Hilary Milnes reported that Shopify’s ecosystem of 20,000 partner developers generated $800 million in agency business in 2017. It’s estimated that Shopify’s partners (several of whom are mentioned here) will earn north of $2 billion in revenue in 2019.

To build a Shopify-like eCommerce platform is not hard to do. What’s very hard to do is replicate the partnership ecosystem and the value they drive. It’s their moat. It’s not the software — their competitive advantage is the partnerships.

Jay Myers, VP of Growth at Bold Commerce

The halo effect of Shopify’s ecosystem will not be easily combated. With many of the partners becoming standout B2B brands themselves, Shopify’s group of independent eCommerce agencies serves many functions: recruiting, evangelizing, and perhaps a bit of espionage – often relaying word of advancements and initiatives proffered by competing platforms. This brand halo effect is amplified thanks to the era of the direct to consumer (DTC) brand.

2019: top commerce providers that DTC brands are looking to for partnership | Source: Cloudways

The brand appeal and staff architecture of this cohort of internet-first companies are keys to understanding why so many challenger brands instinctively select Shopify. Though not a Shopify Partner, Gin Lane’s “work” page notes the many digitally native brands that they’ve steered to the platform. These names include: Harry’s, hims, hers, Sunday Goods, Ayr, Stadium Goods, Rockets of Awesome, Cadre, Recess, alma, Smile Direct, Dia & Co, Warby Parker, Everlane, Quip, Shinola, Bonobos, and Shake Shack. Similarly, Red Antler’s “work” page boasts partnerships with Burrow, Casper, Allbirds, Brandless, Crooked Media, Snowe, and Boxed. These brands, which skew mightily towards Shopify and Shopify Plus, serve as media darlings and public relations fuel.

Tobi Lütke on Twitter

I usually don’t highlight financial milestones here, but this one is worth mentioning: As Shopify passes the $1 billion-dollar revenue mark it does so with the highest growth rate of any SAAS company ever. 🎉

In this way, Shopify’s halo effect extends beyond the agencies with whom they partner. The challenger brands, themselves, become recruiting vehicles for like-minded companies looking to build brands from zero to one. As such, newer companies like Great Jones follow the same branding methods and staff architecture guidelines

On DTC Brand Architecture

It’s common for digitally native brands (DNVBs) to go to market with over $3 million raised. This pre-revenue war chest affords companies an early branding and public relations prowess that almost guarantees seven figures of revenue in the first year.

Partnering with a Red Antler or a Gin Lane can cost a brand up to $400,000. There are often added developmental costs that these challenger brands will have to incur. In addition to the cost for the brand standards, messaging, and the essence of the brand, the right PR contact can cost a young company another $180,000 to $240,000 per year.


No. 297 The DTC Industrial Complex:

There is an entire eCommerce branding industry that fosters the ideation, launch, and early growth of direct to consumer (DtC) brands. When you notice a new digitally vertical native brand in 2018, there’s a platform aura around many of them. First you’ll notice the early PR sensationalism that they can only garner if they graduate from the right school or leave the right corporation. Then, the founders must live in the right city, have the right investors, and pay the right $25,000 per month public relations retainer.


The challenger brand CEO is very well-educated and, at this stage, CEOs tend to start the brands post-business school. Founding teams tend to begin with some combination of a product developer, finance lead, and a customer acquisition lead. Software engineering is an afterthought for many of these young product companies; this competency is often outsourced to a partnering agency. Universally, the priority for challenger brands is two-pronged: (1) making a great product (2) find an efficient way to sell said products. This often reduces the urgency to partner with technical founders or hire early, technical employees. Whereas F = founder, B = early branding, and P = early product development:

F(marketing) + F(finance) + B(outsourced) + P(outsourced) = DTC founding architecture

Shopify’s ecosystem appeals to this particular architecture. The Ottawa-based company’s continued growth depends on their management’s ability to increase the percentage of challenger brands that grow into enterprise clients. And from enterprise clients to Top 1000 online retailers. Shopify’s volume-driven style of business is a mark of its commitment to small business retailers. But it’s not the only method of accelerating enterprise growth. There are several commerce platforms with notable gross merchandise volume (GMV) across their enterprise level of clients.

The Platform Landscape

From BigCommerce to Oracle and Salesforce, the DTC era of retail extends beyond the brands that are the most talked about in design, tech media, and public relations circles. Here is the data on the top nine by gross GMV. While Shopify generates the most media buzz in small business circles: Adobe, Salesforce, and Oracle are quietly leading the enterprise+ business. BigCommerce is often viewed as Shopify’s younger sibling, however their enterprise clients now generate a gross GMV of 2.5x Shopify’s enterprise clients. The following data is derived from a recent Digital Commerce 360 report (2019):

[table id=37 /]

The platform ecosystem is vast. Of the top 1000 retailers, the majority of brands are built in-house and on custom platforms. Nearly 450 retailers have outsourced their technical capabilities to these nine companies. Moving forward, we will likely see platforms like Adobe building tools and an improved halo effect to address Shopify’s key audience and vice versa. Shopify will build tools to address more of the needs of top enterprise plus clients, as well as continuing to support the needs of the DTC brands that are adopting physical retail channels.

Specializing for a particular segment of the SMB to enterprise to enterprise plus spectrum may have dire consequences for platforms in this increasingly competitive space. As Shopify has shown, there is value in building early loyalty. Shopify is counting on a number of their industry-leading number of DTC and SMB retailers moving through the funnel to enterprise services. Additionally, Shopify’s reach grows as brands transition to Shopify from Magento or custom builds. A trend that the Adobe acquisition of Magento has potentially impacted. This continued growth would begin to tip the enterprise / enterprise+ GMV scales in their favor.

Commerce platforms advertise new capabilities with the idea that the technical merits of a platform, alone, will attract new business. To this effect, many of these platforms have deprioritized brand marketing superiority and influential partnership development in favor of technical product development and traditional advertising. Whether or not the improvement of competitor platform capabilities will outlast Shopify’s hard-wired brand loyalty remains to be seen. Objectively speaking, the sheer volume and positive brand association plays in Shopify’s favor. As does their halo effect.

Read the No. 306 curation here.

报告人:Web Smith |大约 2PM

第 296 期休会的理念

recess.png

想象一下,你的品牌最终将与可口可乐公司"斗鸡"对于Recess 的创始人来说,这似乎是不可避免的。虽然 2PM, Inc. 没有为零售业创始人开设播客,但我们每天都在与 CPG 和 DNVB 的投资者和创始人交流。只要与 Ben Witte 交谈一次,您就会感到轻松自如。这位 CPG 创始人有自己的计划,如果他按照自己的方式行事,可口可乐不会阻止他正在打造的品牌。

可口可乐公司正在考虑向消费者推销罐装大麻保健饮料,这是大型饮料巨头应对潜在强效保健饮料萌芽市场的最新举措。

"该公司在一份回应加拿大 BNN 彭博社新服务报道的声明中说:"与饮料行业的许多其他公司一样,我们正在密切关注非精神活性 CBD 作为功能性保健饮料成分在全球的发展。

可口可乐关注以大麻为燃料的健康饮料

BevNet是CPG饮料行业的权威机构,它列出了CBD饮料领域的九家竞争对手。其中两家公司--Dirty LemonRecess--相差无几。但是,对于 CBD 产品领域的新手来说,在初期很难分辨。为了解决这个问题,我购买了这两个品牌的 CBD 产品,并亲自进行了测试:

推特上的 2PM 公司

即将举行:2PM 的首次 CPG / DNVB "正面交锋"。@BenWitte 的 Recess 与 @drinkdirtylemon 的 CBD。我们将评估 "端到端":购买过程、运输和产品。

这两种产品都很出色。Dirty Lemon在物流能力和速度上取得了成功,而Recess则在产品功效上取得了成功。Dirty Lemon由退伍军人转业为工业工程师的扎克-诺曼丁(Zak Normandin)于2015年创立,2016年上架,主打几款健康辅助产品。以下是诺曼丁在最近的《Loose Threads》播客中的发言:

推出时只有一款:木炭。然后我们在 2016 年也推出了胶原蛋白和睡眠。然后在 2017 年,我们推出了人参,然后在 2018 年,我们推出了玫瑰抹茶。今年我们有很多产品。玫瑰抹茶、CBD、Vogue 饮料。是啊。还有我们刚刚推出的姜黄。这是最后一款,今年 12 月我们还会再推出一款。

在诺曼丁对Loose Threads公司创始人的采访中,除了你所看到的内容之外,没有一处提到 "CBD"。这是设计好的。尽管 "肮脏柠檬"CBD 饮料大受欢迎,或该饮料帮助其从流行名人一跃成为实用主流,但在与可口可乐的交易敲定之前,诺曼丁的任务基本上是否认 CBD 的存在。目前,参议员 米奇-麦康奈尔(Mitch McConnell)在2018 年《农业法案》 提出的大麻立法迫在眉睫。如果没有这项立法,全效 CBD 实际上仍将是主流饮料的非法添加剂。

在我体验了诺曼丁公司创新的文本订购流程和令人满意的客户服务后不久,这种 CBD 饮料实际上已经停产(暂时停产)。Dirty Lemon肯定是一个利润丰厚的饮料品牌,可口可乐或百事可乐都会疯狂竞购。它有良好的品牌形象、忠实的追随者和明星效应。 除此之外,产品也相当不错。可口可乐对科比-布莱恩特(KobeBryant)的BODYARMOR饮料的投资与Dirty Lemon希望实现的目标最为接近。在该品牌最近与 NCAA 达成交易之后,布莱恩特离实现收购又近了一步。

根据我们孵化螺栓式并购交易的战略,我们相信,今天获得最初的少数股权,并有明确的所有权途径,将使 BODYARMOR 能够继续以可持续的方式发展业务,同时保持品牌的领导地位和优势,这也是它如此成功的原因。

吉姆-丁金斯,可口可乐公司总裁


摘自第 282 期:Instagram 的 CPG 问题(深入探讨 CBD 行业)

CBD 是大麻二酚的简称,在美容和保健消费者中越来越受欢迎。它是一种不含四氢大麻酚的物质,可用于治疗从肌肉缓解到失眠等各种疾病。今年 6 月,美国食品和药物管理局批准了第一种基于 CBD 的癫痫治疗药物。与本文相关的是,CBD 已经出现在高端护肤品中。但是,Facebook 和 Instagram 的规则参差不齐,在消费类电子产品领域造成了不小的影响。这属于 Facebook 的违禁内容类别


2018 年 10 月,《商业内幕》报道称,可口可乐正在酝酿对Dirty Lemon 进行 A 轮投资。而根据联邦法律,除非从大麻植物的正确部位经过专业提取,否则含有 CBD 被认为是非法的。要做到这一点,需要大量的研究和专业知识。Dirty Lemon目前还不愿意投资。

有关人士表示,随着新一轮融资的完成,Dirty Lemon 将进行重大的品牌重塑。Dirty Lemon 的首席执行官扎克-诺曼丁(Zak Normandin)告诉《商业内幕》(Business Insider),该公司将停产其最受欢迎的产品之一:添加了 CBD 的饮料。

商业内幕Prime

不过,尽管Dirty Lemon公司在消费类电子产品收购领域拥有令人难以置信的上升空间,但Recess公司才有可能成为一个变革性的健康品牌。Dirty Lemon 注重整体健康,在其饮料中使用木炭和胶原蛋白等元素,而Recess似乎通过其早期的品牌塑造和多平台内容提供了一个更好的 "为什么"。鉴于其相对年轻,它需要一切可以得到的帮助。

如果你想订购一箱Recess,你会发现它的滞销期长达四到五周。该品牌的推出和随后的公关巡演都很细致,但威特似乎在玩一场漫长的游戏(直接出自 2PM 的 "最佳实践 "手册)。Witte 并不像Dirty Lemon那样建立一家饮料公司他在建立一个平台。就像Glossier不仅仅是一家化妆品公司一样, Recess的计划也是如此雄心勃勃,也许这才是合理的。与Glossier 及其媒体部门一样Into the Gloss》 一样,Recess 似乎也在承担一项艰巨的任务,那就是教育消费者,让他们了解为什么要以更成人化的形式进行课间休息。大家还记得小学吗?我们已经不再停下来呼吸了。

屏幕截图 2018-11-19 下午 2.25.39
休会 "一词在美国历年的使用情况(1880-2008 年)

虽然诺曼丁和Dirty Lemon暂时没有在采访和宣传材料中提及这种物质,但你也不会在Recess的每一罐产品上看到 "CBD "的缩写。对威特来说,品牌的意义远大于这三个字母。尽管生活节奏日益紧张,但他所提供的产品却能让过度劳累的消费者以富有成效的方式保持冷静、平衡和清醒。对于那些已经避开任何形式的精神活性物质的消费者来说,Recess的任务是使其生产力和安全性正常化。

Dirty Lemon》的场景是为休闲而打造的,而《Recess》则更贴近生活。

为此,Recess可能遇到了一些偶然因素。HRV(心率变异)被称为 "更深层次的指标",越来越多关注健康的企业家和专业人士将其作为一种跟踪测量指标。这种分析指标由 Whoop 推广,并在最新的苹果手表上提供,旨在量化人在睡眠后的身体恢复情况。

为了实现 80-90% 的恢复--尽管有外部压力、体能追求和浅睡眠--许多企业家正在采用 CBD 油和饮料。目标是:解决身体、情绪和精神压力的感知问题。对许多人来说,Recess品牌可能是市场上最受欢迎的选择。

我们的浏览器和大脑都打开了太多的标签。这就是我们制作 Recess 的原因:每一罐都是重新设置和平衡的时刻。这就是你希望下午两点的咖啡带给你的感觉。

Take a Recess主页上的文案说明了一切。Witte 的大麻提取物和适应原配方可能(也可能)与市场上的其他产品不同。但如果由他来决定,公司将为潜在消费者提供的教育和娱乐将是消费类饮料行业中无与伦比的。而他类似于 Glossier 的 "内容与商业 "战略的潜力,将为产品的进一步差异化和罐装或瓶装以外的扩张提供相当大的平台。

在这里阅读您的策划

报告人:Web Smith |大约 2PM