第 273 期现代奢华不弯曲

水印_ByTailorBrands
Pictured: Outdoor Voices, from our Open Letter to DNVB CEOs

In November of 2016, Lean Luxe’s Paul Munford penned somewhat of a scripture to upstart modern luxury brands: promotion-heavy retailers will not last. There are few takeaways from “The Downward Spiral” that are worth mentioning as recent economic reports suggest that the retail apocalypse is coming to an end, a great sign for aspirational DNVBs that are looking to expand into physical retail.

Screen Shot 2018-06-12 at 10.05.48 AM.png

We are in a time of unprecedented retail brand launches, collaborations, acquisitions, and re-imaginations – much of which is online-first. This begs the question, what will separate the winners from the commodities? There are early and permanent decisions that determine a brand’s trajectory. For every Mizzen + Main or Ministry of Supply, there is a State and Liberty. For every Outdoor Voices, there is a Bandier. And for every Away, there is a Raden. Each decision matters. And no decision matters more than pricing and a brand’s promotional tendencies.

Here are the top ten takeaways from some of Munford’s best work:

  • No maneuver in retail appears to be as easy to roll out, yet no strategy is as detrimental to a retailer’s long term prospects as the heavy discount. It is a palliative pill: wonderful for the consumer in the short run, but ultimately bad for both business and shoppers over time. It commoditizes the brand, forcing companies to differentiate on price. 
  • The second problem, also related to scale, is systemic to the industry itself: The need to constantly add more and more products at regular intervals, flooding the marketplace with goods that are newer, but rarely better.
  • The lure of the discount, then, becomes too hard to resist. It provides a short term boost to the bottom line and the illusion of growth, but at the expense of brand reputation and sustainable profit — two vital arteries for a business’s overall health.
  • Modern luxury companies have figured out the formula, and it’s remarkably simple: create less merchandise than will sell (and predict, if possible, the sell-through rate, with pre-orders), keep demand high. Embrace the waiting list, as Everlane, Glossier, Caraa, and Alala, among others, often do. 
  • Never discount; preserve the standing of the brand. These tactics certainly do not work, however, or at least for very long, if product standards are below par.
  • Hermes, for instance, is notorious for never slashing prices. Its products carry a prestige because of that, and there is always a demand, no matter how frivolous the item. And they certainly are not above testing the limits of consumer devotion: It has even gone so far as to repackage its cutting floor leather scraps to sell them as high-priced gift boxes.
  • That opposition to discounting would come from founders within the emerging modern luxury industry is no coincidence. For one, it displays the trademark sense of calm confidence in the product that this group is quickly becoming known for. 
  • As for Mr. Preysman, the full price mantra feeds into his mission to constantly refine the product, to make it better, and push it ever closer to perfection according to the standards of the brand.
  • Surprisingly, rejecting the discount is also quite consumer-centric. The eternally-wise Ben Franklin said it best, of course, when he offered this observation: “The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.”
  • It takes superb maturity and a great deal of resilience to fight the urge for the temporary discount boost at the expense of preserving a long term reputation. 

Maturity, patience, grit, and perhaps temporary poverty are keys to developing the types of brands that grow to compete with age old legends and fierce (but hopefully friendly) rivals. In 2013, Brooks Brothers commented on Mizzen + Main’s influence on the shirting industry for the New York Times:

While Brooks Brothers experimented with “performance” shirts akin to Mizzen & Main’s, [Brooks Brothers’ spokesman] Mr. Blee said that customers preferred the general wearability of conventional all-cotton. The stretch fibers felt synthetic to them. Although a range of Brooks Brothers oxford shirts have moisture-wicking properties, he said, “We are known as a natural-fiber house: 100 percent cotton, 100 percent cashmere.

Just five years later, Brooks Brothers is launching a competitor to compete in a menswear world that is being re-defined by technical fabrics and other innovations.

Mizzen+Main on Twitter

we’re old enough to remember when Brooks Brothers laughed at performance menswear: https://t.co/5hBzcUHAEx https://t.co/xCN29dVk81

I remember the joy of that article hitting the newsstands on December 18, 2013. Not because of the notoriety that it would provide but because it had been over a year and half and we really needed the sales. We stood firm on our price while we built allegiances and Kevin worked feverishly to improve the product. And the company lasted. What Lavelle and team has done today is nothing short of spectacular. And it has allowed the brand to stand, eye to eye, in the same clubs and on the same courses as the company that invented the polo shirt (sorry, Ralph).

To achieve growth and longevity, branding cannot be viewed as a soft skill. Price cannot be viewed as an arbitrary number to manipulate. The five forces must always be considered. And patience must be paramount because great brands start slowly. In the age of modern luxury DNVB’s this is as important as the products themselves.

Read more: An Open Letter to DNVB CEOs (Issue No. 254)

Read the rest of Issue No. 273 here.

By Web Smith and Meghan Terwilliger |About 2PM

第 16 期会员简报:Patreon 的信号

If you’re an independent creator, it’s likely that Patreon is a platform that you call home. Nearly 100,000 creators do. The platform has achieved notable traction in a relatively short period of time. It’s reported that by 2018, they’d process nearly $1 billion. Cofounders Jack Conte and Sam Yam’s creation launched in May of 2013 after Conte grew frustrated by Youtube’s lack of alternative monetization. As the story would go, Conte beta-tested the site with his own personal Youtube audience and began raking in $7,000+ per video. Youtube’s monetization would earn him a little more than $50 for the same work. Fast forward five years and Patreon is synonymous with patronage, as much as Kickstarter is synonymous with crowdfunding.

本会员简报专为以下人士设计 执行委员为了方便加入,您可以点击下面的链接,获取数百份报告、我们的 DTC 权力清单和其他工具,帮助您做出高水平的决策。

在此加入

第 255 期鼓手的本能

水印_ByTailorBrands

我们暂且不谈愤怒,先来看看克莱斯勒的公羊广告,这是一次勇敢的努力,也是一次错失的机会。他们的广告采用了一段演讲,内容是被马克称为 "罗马帝国的衰落"。克莱斯勒和他们的广告代理公司有足够的胆量将其作为素材,值得为他们鼓掌。

因为各国都陷入了'鼓手本能'。我必须第一,我必须至高无上,我们的国家必须统治世界。我将继续对美国说这番话。因为我太爱这个国家了,爱到不愿看到它的偏离。

马丁-路德-金在同一次演讲中。

在这个政治色彩浓厚的 NFL 赛季中,超级碗广告普遍与美国政治保持距离。显然,人们已经对社会行动主义产生了疲劳。但公羊卡车公司的这则广告却试图做到面面俱到 ,坦率地说,只有勇气才能将勇敢的努力转化为有意义的结果。

这里有几个层面需要考虑,首先是广告的框架:

  • 公羊公司想卖卡车。这也是你花 500 万美元在世界最大舞台上做广告的唯一原因。
  • 克莱斯勒将这一概念和方向外包给了芝加哥的一家精品代理公司High Dive。他们的尝试很可能是善意的。
  • 二月是黑人历史月。
  • 马丁-路德-金是一位安全的美国英雄。
  • 费城老鹰队和新英格兰爱国者队在 2017-2018 赛季都派出了积极分子球员。
  • 克莱斯勒依靠总统的支持率来发表他们认为大多数理性美国人都同意的声明。

这家创意公司很可能会认同自由主义。而且,他们也很可能认为,这个广告是一个机会,可以做的不仅仅是推销产品。拉姆公司的主页上有一句有趣的口号:

屏幕截图 2018-02-05 at 5.30.44 PM

这很可能是他们采用这种方式的动机。在今年最重要的比赛之前整整五十年,将著名的 MLKDrum Major Instinct(鼓手本能)演讲并列在一起,实在是太令人难以拒绝了。尽管考虑到他们选择的广告形象,该演讲的背景意义不大。

上述广告公司请求金氏家族遗产允许在广告中使用他的肖像。在得到许可后,我们可以推断出创意公司和克莱斯勒公司内部营销团队之间发生了争执。

马丁-路德-金显然是一位伟人,但就背景而言,到 1968 年,他已经对越南战争感到厌倦。他还为美国的穷人(所有种族)披荆斩棘。他公开呼吁结束美国企业的贪婪。当时,他的声望已跌至历史最低点。通过 "鼓手 "演讲,他确立了美国极左派纲领的一些基本原则,这些原则延续了几十年。 这则广告试图将他的言论与我们的时代并列起来。

ram-sb-team-mlk-PAGE-2018

我大胆猜测,创意机构希望看到球员下跪的画面。因为他们当然想要。克莱斯勒的公羊团队很可能反对并妥协,允许High Dive在 1.7 秒的时间内加入非裔美国高中橄榄球队员跪地进行赛前祈祷的画面。在一则针对田纳西州库克维尔等城镇中 25-35 岁男性的卡车广告中,这个意象模糊得足以成为一个政治问题。

使用这篇马丁-路德-金演讲的真正魅力在于他对 "伟大 "一词的重新定义--这是反对现任政府 "让美国再次伟大 "口号的论据。在支持率仅为 30% 的情况下,这是一个稳妥的选择。克莱斯勒团队抓住了这一政治中心主义的方法,因为它对右派没有攻击性,而且(假定)对左派也很有吸引力。

用这么多话来概括,这句广告词就是:"......":

美国已经很伟大了,这是因为我们是一个相信帮助同胞的仆人国家。拉姆是服务者的载体。

我完全理解这种集体思考过程。如果你不理解,那就想想,没有哪项体育运动能比美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)的一小群球员更深入社会激进主义的世界--其中一人是费城老鹰队的首发球员。 ,另一人则被禁止参加比赛。出于明显的品牌人口统计原因,他们都没有参与广告。去年最有意义的广告之一就这样诞生了。

但这则广告平淡无奇。因此,在创意环境中,意见和背景的多样性就显得尤为重要。

整个 2017 年,人们的认知出现了相当大的偏差。许多 NFL 球迷、评论员、政客和我们的总统都指责那些参加和平抗议的人。与此同时,他们却在抬举和表彰抗议活动的发起人。拉姆以这种方式无意中强调了这种认知失调,并在社交媒体和其他媒体上引起了强烈反响。

ESPN 的达伦-罗威尔(Darren Rovell)在给 2PM 的留言中说道:

公司真的不能用这样的言论来推销东西。这只会让人觉得肮脏。至少我有这种反应,推特上的每个人似乎也有这种反应。就像 "王子投影 "一样,当我们让死人复活时,我们必须非常小心。我觉得道奇被 50 年的想法迷住了。但并没有充分考虑到这种粗俗的商业主义如何使其很难作为一种手段来更好地销售。

我对广告本身并无不满。金氏家族的遗产方批准了这一广告,而创意公司也可能在一些强大的限制条件下尽了最大努力。

我感到遗憾的是,这次机会被白白浪费了,哪怕是对视觉效果做最微小的调整,也能缓解骚动。

没有公羊卡车在需要时为他人服务的素材。没有和平抗议者跳下卡车与前线朋友会合的档案画面。甚至没有军人(服役者)和运动员/政治活动家(服役者)双方对彼此的努力达成和解的画面。

马克思的布道之所以如此震撼人心,是因为它让我们思考自身的人性缺陷。

但也许下一次,广告公司和企业内部团队可以鼓起勇气,走出自己的舒适区,向真实的信息靠拢。即使它并不整洁或政治上不正确。这也是一种服务。 

这是编辑的观点。2PM Parse pod致力于分析此类广告的好坏。 

点击此处阅读更多相关内容。


点击此处聆听马克思演讲全文。截至发稿时,该广告的浏览量是拉姆备受赞誉的维京广告的 14 倍。