备忘录奥运时尚

拉尔夫-劳伦(Ralph Lauren)的市值超过 80 亿美元,年收入也将超过 2020 年的 61.6 亿美元,几乎无人能与之媲美。这也许就是为什么在今年的东京奥运会上,拉尔夫-劳伦受到的冷遇就像它的清凉西装一样。纽约时报》首席时尚评论家瓦妮莎-弗里德曼(Vanessa Friedman)最近报道了拉尔夫-劳伦公司的多项进步:

旗手苏-伯德(Sue Bird)和艾迪-阿尔瓦雷斯(Eddy Alvarez)的海军夹克采用了该品牌所称的 RLCoolant 技术。[1]

2011 年,Ministry of Supply 和 Mizzen + Main 等公司开创了这一行业的先河。

哦,还有 "牛仔裤"(当然,他们必须有牛仔裤:设计师拉尔夫甚至穿着自己的褪色牛仔裤出席黑色领带活动)由一种特殊的新材料制成,该品牌称其 "不含合成塑料"。[1]

作为预科生服装和技术服装行业的资深人士,我对这些改进表示赞赏。这些改进值得关注,公司对国内生产的重视也是如此。这些都是值得欢迎的进步,没有人能像 RL 一样试探市场。但在大众看来,这些发展并不值得其登上伟大的国际舞台。尽管自 2008 年以来,拉尔夫-劳伦在为美国运动员提供服装方面取得了显著成绩,但自那时起,已经发生了翻天覆地的变化。该品牌所面临的不是技术或供应链方面的缺陷,而是文化方面的缺陷。在《新准备》一书中,我曾解释过拉夫-劳伦、汤米-希尔费格和布鲁克斯兄弟面临着在文化上无足轻重的风险:

对于拉尔夫-劳伦(Ralph Lauren)和汤米-希尔费格(Tommy Hilfiger)这样的零售商来说,非裔美国人的街头服饰文化与他们的风格不谋而合。这种新的有机兴趣基础推动这两个品牌在 20 世纪 90 年代达到了非凡的高度。拉尔夫-劳伦公司(及其 55 亿美元的市值)仍然是这种偶然文化影响的受益者。

很少有人能预料到自 2008 年以来发生了什么。Aimé Leon Dore、Noah、KITH、Telfar、Todd Snyder(American Eagle 旗下品牌)和 Rowing Blazers 等品牌都为改写前卫风格做出了贡献。这些品牌以各自的方式承认了拉尔夫-劳伦在其最关键的发展阶段所没有承认的东西。GQ》杂志的瑞秋-塔什简(Rachel Tashjian)认为,美国运动装正在崛起。它真实、包容。

上世纪八九十年代,拉尔夫-劳伦(Ralph Lauren)意外地引发了一场文化革命,如今,这种文化已几乎吞噬了预科生文化。在汉普顿,丽贝卡-默瑟(Rebekah Mercer)和肖恩-康姆斯(Sean Combs)住在同一个社区。在精英预科学校,十几岁的学生们开着吉普牧马人,听着嘻哈音乐,穿着乔丹 1 号,配着学校发的格子和卡其布,来到校园门口。比起《残酷意向》,这些场景更像是《新杰克城》中的意象。他们的流行文化偶像拥有棕色和黑色的皮肤。即使他们没有,他们也受到了这些艺术家的影响。周末,高中和大学预科生的衣橱都会受到 StockX 或 Golden Goose 的影响。美国预科生(American Prep)的定义与丽莎-伯恩鲍姆(Lisa Birnbaum)1980 年的经典作品《预科生手册》(The Preppy Handbook相去甚远,甚至可以说是另一种时尚流派。但事实并非如此。它是真正的预科生。

1990 年,有 171 年历史的犹他州日报《得赛特新闻》发表了一篇文章:

如果把 20 世纪 80 年代拍成电影--鉴于演员兼总统罗纳德-里根(Ronald Reagan)在这 10 年中的统治地位,这种隐喻几乎是不可避免的--那么在电影的字幕中就必须包括拉尔夫-劳伦(Ralph Lauren)的服装。[2]

时至东京奥运会,拉尔夫-劳伦(Ralph Lauren)所表达的美国式矜持是上世纪 80 年代的传统,而非 2020 年代的现实。当你提出一个不能准确反映美国的文化概念时,你会看到无数像下面这样的回应:

迈克-辛顿在 Twitter 上:"为什么拉尔夫-劳伦总是被选为美国队奥运会开幕式制服的设计者?我们的美国运动员是一个多元化的群体,他们不是一群要去纽波特或汉普顿的预科白人。pic.twitter.com/JaTCH6tEu9 / Twitter"

为什么拉尔夫-劳伦总是被选为美国队奥运会开幕式制服的设计者?我们的美国运动员是一个多元化的群体,他们不是一群要去纽波特或汉普顿的矜持白人。 pic.twitter.com/JaTCH6tEu9

对上流社会的过度漫画化的问题在于,它助长了这样一种暗示,即纽波特、汉普顿、名校和著名行业(曾因 80 年代的雅皮士文化而闻名)等地都没有其他人。事实并非如此。华尔街有受过常春藤教育的有色人种银行家。最好的学校里也有文化和种族多元化的学生。很少有人穿得像在布洛克岛(Block Island)度完周末后停泊自己的帆船。如果说拉尔夫-劳伦版的美国预科生就是今天的现实,那就等于说目前居住在这种文化中的人并不属于这种文化。那我们该何去何从呢?

虽然拉尔夫-劳伦的命运要比布鲁克斯兄弟好得多,但毫无疑问,新的后卫已经出现。

大概正是因为这样的推文,才值得业内最有成就的时尚作家之一做出回应。我在那条推文中写道

今年可能是拉尔夫-劳伦为奥运代表队提供服装的最后一年。下一个设计周期很可能是一个由众多品牌组成的联合体,这些品牌定义了今天。Noah、KITH、Aime Leon Dore、Todd Snyder、Rowing Blazers、Fear of God、Telfar 等等。

这绝非一厢情愿。说白了,弗里德曼不太可能是特指我的建议,但我对她用来证明拉尔夫-劳伦继续参与的理由有异议。弗里德曼的论点很简单:RL 的护城河就是规模经济。

凡妮莎-弗里德曼在推特上说"所有那些呼吁为美国队提供新的奥运官方服装而不是更多拉夫-劳伦的人--我明白,但请记住:他们必须有能力为 615 名选手和教练等免费制作服装。有这样预算的设计师是有限的。/ Twitter"

所有这些人都在呼吁为美国队提供新的奥运官方服装,而不是更多的拉夫-劳伦(Ralph Lauren)--我明白,但请记住:他们必须有能力为 615 名选手和教练等免费制作服装。有这样预算的设计师是有限的。

规模并不是人们想象中的护城河。在数字原生时代诞生的许多个人品牌都可以独立完成这项任务。这些品牌不仅仅是独立的设计公司,它们在大多数情况下都是有资金支持的企业。由延斯-格雷德(Jens Grede)和金-卡戴珊(Kim Kardashian)创立的 Skims 公司在其两年的生命周期中筹集了 1.54 亿美元。该公司因成为 "美国奥运代表队官方内衣供应商 "而成为新闻焦点。Rowing Blazers装备了萨尔瓦多奥运代表队中一支规模小得多的队伍,这也表明了这家最近重新注资的公司在美国的雄心壮志。出生于皇后区的利比里亚裔美国设计师特尔法-克莱门斯(Telfar Clemens)成功地为利比里亚奥运代表队提供了服装,这也表明,如果美国奥林匹克委员会选择考虑重新定义当今的美国文化,他也会迎难而上。最近,碧昂斯(Beyoncé)带着他设计的一款手袋出现在人们面前,这位受欢迎的设计师也因此被推上了主流舞台。碧昂斯如此,美国亦然。

弗里德曼的观点是,这种机会的经济效益是不可低估的。虽然很少有品牌有能力为 615 名奥运选手提供 80 套服装,但还是有办法完成这样的任务。跳出时尚的圈子,你也许会找到解决之道。

本周,"NOBULL "将迎来一年一度的盛事,在长达 10 年的时间里,锐步(Reebok)一直是这一盛事的代名词。MLS 杯冠军哥伦布机员队(Columbus Crew)在易主后搬入了新球场,并对其在城市文化中的作用重新产生了兴趣。当耗资 3.14 亿美元的 Lower.com Field 球场出人意料地宣布落成时,NOBULL 才刚刚成立三年。据《哥伦布商业第一报》报道,这笔交易的价值为每年 300-400 万美元。奥运会开幕式也提供了类似的机会。

你不可能看到一个时尚品牌为体育场馆或体育赛事命名,但 Halston(1976 年)、Levi's(1980 年和 1984 年)和 Ralph Lauren(2008 年至今)建立了足够接近的关系。如果有机会在国际舞台上提升自己的品牌,现代零售商很可能会抓住机会,筹集必要的资金来承担这一项目。这其中包括 10%的美国奥委会特许权使用费、官方版权,以及向奥运主办国运送一整个赛季的产品所需的货物成本。作为回报,该品牌将获得赚取的媒体、敞开的大门、漏斗顶端的兴趣,或许还有 2024 年夏季奥运会的伟大故事。

将会有一个品牌崛起,填补拉尔夫-劳伦的空缺。当他们对经典美式风格的诠释被电视转播并流传到全球各地时,人们将不会感觉到这是对美式矫揉造作的讽刺。它看起来就像美国。如果拉尔夫-劳伦选择把接力棒交给下一代美国品牌,那么没有一个品牌不愿意设计、生产和运输这项荣誉。事实上,至少有几个品牌正在积极等待这个机会。他们已经做好了准备。

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes 

备忘录时尚

The merits of fashion retail have never been logical but for the best operators, there is a way to make sense of the chaos.

Likeability, brand equity, and appeal can shift in an instant. But there are predictors of success and failure. Historical benchmarks have long been available to serve as guideposts for the savviest retailers looking to navigate tumultuous times of the present. Manufacturers have thrived during war, recession, protest, and pandemic, and only the poorer performers cited external factors as cause for concern.

A common misconception in the digitally native vertical brand industry is that the previous year of the pandemic is thwarting the growth of fashion retailers, harming sales projections, stifling growth, or shuttering doors. The hard data contends there’s more to the story. Of the current top 100 fastest-growing direct-to-consumer brands tracked by 2PM, 40 are fashion retailers, while four are in the top 10. This has been a breakout year for fashion.

Updated for the week of 2/8/2021

A number of modern brands deepened community and developed foundations for explosive growth over the last 12 months: Parade, Rowing Blazers, Madhappy, Aime Leon Dore, Tracksmith, Buck Mason, Gymshark, and Monica & Andy are but a few. For the retailers who struggled through the last year, this memo can serve as a helpful reset.

The average American buys a piece of clothing every five days. A study of historical crises will show that our behaviors do not slow to halt during moments of distress. Instead, they change; we allocate our spend differently. We limit our purchases to “affordable pleasures” or we shift to differing styles that represent the feel of the moment in question. We are wired to buy things to wear and we do so frequently, even the most frugal of us. What changes is how we express our individuality in evolving times.

Consider Ralph Lauren’s rise in the late 1970s and early 1980s despite a catastrophic American recession. A 1990 article in Utah’s 171-year-old daily paper Deseret News began:

If the 1980s were a movie – and the metaphor is almost unavoidable given actor/president Ronald Reagan’s domination of the decade – the credit lines would have to include costumes by Ralph Lauren. [1]

The designer identified and marched forward on a new approach to an established idea, the article explains: The New Traditionalism or “the baby boom’s kitschification of the middle age.” Lauren wasn’t the first; an even greater example of this strategy is 1947’s launch of then-obscure designer Christian Dior’s first line.

In 1947, my first collection was successful beyond my wildest dreams. 

After departing the army in 1942, the 37-year-old Dior joined the Lucien Lelong fashion house alongside a gentleman named Pierre Balmain, the house’s other primary designer. Drio, along with Lelong and Balmain, labored to maintain France’s fashion industry throughout World War II. Five years later, Dior launched his design house’s debut fragrance. The bottled Miss Dior perfume was a tribute to his sister Catherine who was liberated from a concentration camp just two years prior. Inspired by the country’s Belle Époque period of the late 1800s, Dior preceded Ralph Lauren in a period-driven return to tradition. It was his admiration of that period, 50 years on, that influenced a femininity in his design that would eventually take the contemporary fashion world by storm.

Fashion has never been logical. Sometimes, timing is as much a factor as anything else. For Dior, timing couldn’t have been better. Fast Company’s Liz Segran recently covered COVID-19’s effect on fashion trends. She cited Dior’s prescient strategy and brilliant timing:

During World War II, for instance, women wore jeans and overalls as they took over men’s jobs. Then, in 1947, Christian Dior unveiled his debut collection, which featured figure-hugging jackets, fitted waists, and A-line skirts. It was a radically feminine look that repudiated the utilitarian, masculinized garments of the previous years—and that was the point. Around the world, women swooned over this style, dubbed the “New Look,” which became a dominant fashion trend of the late 1940s and early 1950s. [2]

This next part is prescient. In that Fast Company report, Segran went on to explain the dynamic of women wearing men’s workwear, including overalls and denim, during the war. She cited author Kimberly Chrisman-Campbell explaining how, even after the war concluded and the pendulum swung to a radically feminine look, the fashion trends of the war persisted:

After a crisis, there is a backlash, but there is also a lasting effect. Both of these can be true at the same time.

The war years normalized a new era for womenswear, including pants and garments that were never before considered customary. This sheds light on the potential post-pandemic behaviors of today.

The retail industry has suffered from foundational issues. The reliance on debt leverage to fund growth and inventory has contributed to legacy companies filing for bankruptcy. Of these, J.Crew, Brooks Brothers, JCPenney, and Neiman Marcus are three of many.

However, like womenswear post-World War II, the reset is not as clear as once thought. America’s current comfort in casual wear is likely to persist in the home and places of work for years to come. Consumers did buy clothes to wear during the pandemic despite the remote work trend, stay-at-home orders, and distance learning. The clothes or the messages by the retailers were just unique to the time.

Good Fashion, Bad Everything

This year, traditional retailers like VF Corporation’s The North Face grew in prominence through careful merchandising, streetwear adoption, and savvy collaborations (See: Gucci). Lululemon’s stock is trading near all-time highs. And Gucci has become the “preferred” luxury brand of Generation Z.

While many brands are suffering, and some have had to take drastic measures like permanently closing stores, other brands like Dior or Louis Vuitton have been performing well, indicating that the pandemic is hitting brands with pre-existing conditions harder. [3]

Direct brands like Parade climbed from relative obscurity to $10 million in annual revenue. Rowing Blazers, a traditional menswear retailer, showed up on everything from NBA stars to Princess Diana in Netflix’s The Crown. Madhappy used savvy merchandising, a persisting message, and their partnership with LVMH to earn Lebron James’ attention in the NBA bubble. The brand is now one of the most coveted streetwear brands born in the last five years. Gymshark accepted its first funding, landing at a valuation north of $1 billion. And Tracksmith, the amateur running brand, finally caught the attention of the mainstream after years of quiet growth. It is now featured across the airwaves thanks to the success of their succinct and aspirational advertising strategy.

Like Ralph Lauren’s rise to prominence during an economic recession and political and cultural reset, and Christian Dior’s establishing of a new post-war tone for American women that flew in the face of other trends, the brands that succeeded during our most recent global crisis did so because they were properly equipped. In each case, they all share (1) smart marketing, (2) savvy merchandising, (3) a messaging strategy that cuts through the worried noise, and most importantly, (4) appreciation for the history of the industry.

For the brands that struggle to regain their footing, at least one of the above four are missing. The pandemic has served as a mirror for modern and traditional retailers alike. Walk into a J.Crew and you may feel soulless. Walk into a Rimowa store and you will feel the sense of New Traditionalism that catapulted Dior and Ralph Lauren to generational success. An over-reliance on physical distribution, pay-per-click advertising, traditional merchandising cycles, academic marketing strategies, and stale interpretations of customer profiles are the preexisting conditions that culminated with the current state of retail distress.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Study the best practices of the past. There will always be momentum shifts, forth and back, over time. The brands that survive are studied in sociology, customer understanding, brand history, communication, and the experiences that elevate a product into a moment. These brands capture more than eyeballs; they capture imagination. It’s the one constant of an enduring brand over decades of ebbs and flows.

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes

New to 2PM? Read the rest of the 662nd edition.

Member Brief: The New Prep

S7Gd4HRw

The man wearing the overcoat was gone. The black frock coat that he wore was tailored to his long frame. Inside the coat read “One Country, One Destiny” and he had it on when he passed away. In March 1865, just two weeks before his assassination, Brooks Brothers commissioned the manufacturing of the coat for the president. The insignia along the silk twill embroidery was intended to be a reminder that national unity was utmost priority.

本会员简报专为以下人士设计 执行委员为了方便加入,您可以点击下面的链接,获取数百份报告、我们的 DTC 权力清单和其他工具,帮助您做出高水平的决策。

在此加入