第 273 期现代奢华不弯曲

In November of 2016, Lean Luxe’s Paul Munford penned somewhat of a scripture to upstart modern luxury brands: promotion-heavy retailers will not last. There are few takeaways from “The Downward Spiral” that are worth mentioning as recent economic reports suggest that the retail apocalypse is coming to an end, a great sign for aspirational DNVBs that are looking to expand into physical retail.

We are in a time of unprecedented retail brand launches, collaborations, acquisitions, and re-imaginations – much of which is online-first. This begs the question, what will separate the winners from the commodities? There are early and permanent decisions that determine a brand’s trajectory. For every Mizzen + Main or Ministry of Supply, there is a State and Liberty. For every Outdoor Voices, there is a Bandier. And for every Away, there is a Raden. Each decision matters. And no decision matters more than pricing and a brand’s promotional tendencies.
Here are the top ten takeaways from some of Munford’s best work:
- No maneuver in retail appears to be as easy to roll out, yet no strategy is as detrimental to a retailer’s long term prospects as the heavy discount. It is a palliative pill: wonderful for the consumer in the short run, but ultimately bad for both business and shoppers over time. It commoditizes the brand, forcing companies to differentiate on price.
- The second problem, also related to scale, is systemic to the industry itself: The need to constantly add more and more products at regular intervals, flooding the marketplace with goods that are newer, but rarely better.
- The lure of the discount, then, becomes too hard to resist. It provides a short term boost to the bottom line and the illusion of growth, but at the expense of brand reputation and sustainable profit — two vital arteries for a business’s overall health.
- Modern luxury companies have figured out the formula, and it’s remarkably simple: create less merchandise than will sell (and predict, if possible, the sell-through rate, with pre-orders), keep demand high. Embrace the waiting list, as Everlane, Glossier, Caraa, and Alala, among others, often do.
- Never discount; preserve the standing of the brand. These tactics certainly do not work, however, or at least for very long, if product standards are below par.
- Hermes, for instance, is notorious for never slashing prices. Its products carry a prestige because of that, and there is always a demand, no matter how frivolous the item. And they certainly are not above testing the limits of consumer devotion: It has even gone so far as to repackage its cutting floor leather scraps to sell them as high-priced gift boxes.
- That opposition to discounting would come from founders within the emerging modern luxury industry is no coincidence. For one, it displays the trademark sense of calm confidence in the product that this group is quickly becoming known for.
- As for Mr. Preysman, the full price mantra feeds into his mission to constantly refine the product, to make it better, and push it ever closer to perfection according to the standards of the brand.
- Surprisingly, rejecting the discount is also quite consumer-centric. The eternally-wise Ben Franklin said it best, of course, when he offered this observation: “The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.”
- It takes superb maturity and a great deal of resilience to fight the urge for the temporary discount boost at the expense of preserving a long term reputation.
Maturity, patience, grit, and perhaps temporary poverty are keys to developing the types of brands that grow to compete with age old legends and fierce (but hopefully friendly) rivals. In 2013, Brooks Brothers commented on Mizzen + Main’s influence on the shirting industry for the New York Times:
While Brooks Brothers experimented with “performance” shirts akin to Mizzen & Main’s, [Brooks Brothers’ spokesman] Mr. Blee said that customers preferred the general wearability of conventional all-cotton. The stretch fibers felt synthetic to them. Although a range of Brooks Brothers oxford shirts have moisture-wicking properties, he said, “We are known as a natural-fiber house: 100 percent cotton, 100 percent cashmere.”
Just five years later, Brooks Brothers is launching a competitor to compete in a menswear world that is being re-defined by technical fabrics and other innovations.
Mizzen+Main on Twitter
we’re old enough to remember when Brooks Brothers laughed at performance menswear: https://t.co/5hBzcUHAEx https://t.co/xCN29dVk81
I remember the joy of that article hitting the newsstands on December 18, 2013. Not because of the notoriety that it would provide but because it had been over a year and half and we really needed the sales. We stood firm on our price while we built allegiances and Kevin worked feverishly to improve the product. And the company lasted. What Lavelle and team has done today is nothing short of spectacular. And it has allowed the brand to stand, eye to eye, in the same clubs and on the same courses as the company that invented the polo shirt (sorry, Ralph).
To achieve growth and longevity, branding cannot be viewed as a soft skill. Price cannot be viewed as an arbitrary number to manipulate. The five forces must always be considered. And patience must be paramount because great brands start slowly. In the age of modern luxury DNVB’s this is as important as the products themselves.
Read more: An Open Letter to DNVB CEOs (Issue No. 254)
Read the rest of Issue No. 273 here.
By Web Smith and Meghan Terwilliger |About 2PM
第 259 期沃尔玛的下一次收购

上周末,2PM 发布了第一份执行委员简报。在一份名为《沃尔玛与亚马逊电子商务》的深度报告中,它涵盖了相当多的内容。 沃尔玛风险投资.
下面是一小段摘录:
沃尔玛和亚马逊之间的竞争从未如此激烈。消费主义一直都是以 "心 "为中心的,直到亚马逊让它变得以效率和逻辑为中心。但是,对于像穿什么、睡什么这样私密的物品,逻辑就足够了吗?
沃尔玛通过注重品牌亲和力、代表性和重振消费者信心,再次将赌注押在了消费者的心上。以电子商务为矛头,他们的实体店也将随之革新。
我倾向于相信马克-洛尔对现代沃尔玛的愿景,这已经不是什么秘密了。在我最近的报告中,我重点介绍了沃尔玛通过收购 DNVB(Modcloth、Moosejaw、Bonobos 等)实现品牌资产增长的情况。2PM执行成员泰勒-哈乐迪(Taylor Holiday)向我指出了这一点:
一如既往的精彩,Web。这篇文章略微忽略了我的一个问题,那就是物流能力。您简要地谈到了亚马逊所注重的便利性因素,我想知道沃尔玛将如何与之抗衡?我认为超级超级有趣的事情是,沃尔玛可以将 DNVB 风格的华而不实的品牌发布与物流超级大国的便利性结合起来。想象一下,Allswell 式的品牌与当日送达相结合。这将会非常有趣。
泰勒-霍利迪,Common Thread管理合伙人
在我的报告中,我提供了两张表格:(1)沃尔玛现有的收购;(2)沃尔玛的目标收购。对于泰勒的观点,在讨论沃尔玛对收购性感的 DNVB(或从头开始建设)的胃口时,很容易忽略他们还收购了Parcel(2017 年)。沃尔玛正在努力打造物流超级大国。如果他们不能完成这项工作,另一项 10 亿美元以上的收购也即将开始。
沃尔玛收购 Parcel:
纽约市是 Jet 和 Walmart.com 的顶级市场,由于该地区人口密集,而且离我们的履约中心很近,因此是进行高效创新的理想之地。Parcel 在纽约土生土长,在这个极具挑战性的重要市场中积累了为客户送货的独特专长。此次收购使我们能够继续测试在降低运营成本的同时提供快速递送服务的方法。我们计划利用 Parcel 为纽约市的客户提供最后一英里配送服务(包括当日送达),包括一般商品以及沃尔玛和 Jet 的新鲜和冷冻食品杂货。
昨晚的奥斯卡颁奖典礼进一步证明了沃尔玛高层对物流的重视。
每个 60 秒广告的主角都与沃尔玛目前的广告活动相同--零售商标志性的蓝色装运箱--这也是沃尔玛在电子商务领域追赶亚马逊的企业优先事项。
Jack Neff,AdAge
如果让我预测沃尔玛的作战室战略,我想到的是收购Postmates。在全国范围内,Postmates 是最值得信赖的 "最后一英里"平台之一,而且它已经证明可以在美国许多最大的市场运营。再加上该公司最近对杂货配送的重视,你会发现它有很多共同的优点。沃尔玛的食品杂货业务是其重中之重。
假设 Parcel 的收购是一次测试,那么 Postmates 的收购可能会成为沃尔玛单一市场实验的受益者。在DoorDash 最近获得 5.35 亿美元融资后,这次收购对足智多谋的巴斯蒂-莱曼(Basti Lehmann)和公司来说很有意义。而且这次收购也在沃尔玛的价格范围之内。呼叫马克-罗尔。
点击此处阅读更多相关内容。

