深度挖掘:两个 DTC 品牌

Both companies set out to take on Nike and Adidas. The eventual divergence of their paths can be attributed to a number of differences in decisions: funding methods, geographies, early adopters, and design philosophies. But what ultimately set one shoe brand up for international dominance ($8+ billion market cap) and the other into survival mode ($100 million market cap) came down to this: comfort.

It can be easy to forget that Allbirds, at one time, seemed to be on the same trajectory as On. Wrote Rachel Syme in 2018 for the New Yorker:

In their initial wave of popularity, Allbirds became an essential part of the daily uniform of Bay Area tech entrepreneurs. But in the past year Allbirds have travelled outside the clean hallways of Silicon Valley headquarters and tipped into the mainstream. Mila Kunis wears Allbirds. So does Jennifer Garner. So do Park Slope dads and modern dancers and trendy teen-agers and kooky aunts and registered nurses and bartenders and pretty much every overworked, weary thirtysomething you see on the New York subway.”

The cascading effects of comfort as a variable would take volumes of essays to explain but here I will try to simplify as best I can. I wrote this about Allbirds in February of 2022 when it was still a $1.5 billion company. 

Allbirds is cozying up to wholesale. It’s an interesting paradox in omnichannel strategy that takes brand awareness and unit economics into consideration. The brands with sales velocity and stature to own their distribution can and will move towards an owned-store / DTC model. Brands working to reach profitability and scale are moving towards third-party retail wholesale partnerships.

In that essay entitled “Omnichannel Nirvana“, I opined that the strongest brands are pursuing DTC strategies while brands in need of sales growth are highly reliant on wholesale partnerships. The irony of the timing of this new report is that Allbirds is still pursuing wholesale and On Running is shifting in the opposite direction, according to this report in WWD.

The Swiss sports brand reported the strongest quarter in its history Tuesday morning with a jump of 46.5 percent in net sales to 480.5 million Swiss francs, driven in large part by its direct-to-consumer business.

As a result, the company will focus primarily on its own DTC efforts going forward and stick with the wholesale partners it already has without significantly adding to its stable. DTC accounts for 35 percent of overall sales.

The journey from performance to fashion statement encapsulates the evolving dynamics of consumer preferences and market trends. Nike, Adidas, and Reebok followed this pattern. Today, it is On Running. And I suspect that it will tilt the brand’s trajectory even higher.

Phil Knight, the visionary behind Nike, initially believed that running shoes were solely meant for sports. He found out that he was wrong. Over time, basketball shoes, epitomized by brands like Nike and Adidas, became the casual footwear of choice, transcending their functional roots to become fashion staples. Without many exceptions, the trend has pivoted away from basketball and returned to running shoes as the primary exhibitor of daily wear (and fashion in some cases).

Today, brands like Hoka and On Running, renowned for their exceptionally comfortable soles, are worn casually by the executive classes, a demographic that Allbirds once firmly held thanks to the early adoption by west coast venture capitalists alluded to in the introduction. This transition from performance to casual wear reflects the changing landscape of the athletic footwear industry and consumer priorities. The great contrast between the two brands began with comfort. People wear Hoka and On because it feels good to wear the shoe. Eventually, enough people wore them that their appearance became more socially acceptable outside of running circles. Like Hoka, On shoes have a particular look that was more unconventional than their counterparts at Nike and Adidas.

Good Steps and Missteps

The rise of On Running is noteworthy and generational. Founded in 2010 by Swiss Ironman champion Olivier Bernhard, On has experienced a meteoric rise in popularity, especially in the last few years. A significant boost in its profile came in 2019 when Swiss tennis great Roger Federer became a shareholder. In 2023, On announced $490 million in net sales in the second quarter, marking its sixth consecutive best-ever quarter. The brand’s appeal transcends its athletic origins, finding favor among various consumer segments, from tech workers to boomer parents and the athleisure crowd. Keys to its growth:

  • Product Innovation: On Running’s unique cloud-like cushioning technology has appealed to both serious athletes and casual wearers. Its focus on technological innovation in footwear has set it apart in terms of performance and comfort.
  • Market Positioning: On Running has successfully positioned itself across multiple segments, catering to both high-performance athletes and consumers looking for comfortable, stylish footwear. This dual appeal has broadened its customer base significantly.
  • Global Expansion: On Running has expanded its market reach globally, making significant inroads in Europe, North America, and Asia. This global presence has contributed to its growing revenue.
  • Brand Partnerships: The involvement of high-profile figures like Roger Federer has boosted On Running’s brand visibility and appeal. These partnerships have helped the brand gain credibility and attract a diverse range of consumers.

On’s shoes, known for their patented CloudTec soles, have historically been relatively firm, catering to a different runner preference than the traditionally softer American market. However, their recent models like the Cloudmonster and partnerships with athletes like Kristian Blummenfelt indicate a renewed focus on athletic performance.

Allbirds, on the other hand, initially captivated the market with its sustainable Wool Runner shoes. Founded in 2016 with a sustainability bend, Allbirds quickly gained popularity, especially in tech hubs like Silicon Valley. However, as the company tried to expand rapidly into new market segments and product lines, like running shoes and apparel, it faced significant challenges. The materials used in its running shoes were not well-suited for intensive activity, leading to durability issues. Its apparel line, made entirely of merino wool, was criticized for being too warm and uncomfortable. Furthermore, Allbirds’ expansion into younger consumer demographics and other product categories without sufficient market research diluted its brand image and confused consumers about what the brand stood for. Keys to its struggles:

  • Segmentation Missteps: Allbirds’ expansion into running shoes and apparel was not well-received. The materials used in their products, while sustainable, did not meet the performance and comfort expectations of the new segments they targeted, particularly in the athletic footwear market.
  • Brand Dilution: The rapid expansion into various product lines and market segments diluted Allbirds’ core brand image. This lack of focus led to confusion about the brand’s identity and diminished its appeal to its original customer base.
  • Pricing and Product Quality: The higher price points of Allbirds’ new products, combined with quality issues, especially in terms of durability and suitability for athletic use, led to customer dissatisfaction and lower sales.

Looking ahead, for Allbirds to reemerge successfully, a pivot in strategy may be crucial. Transitioning from a sustainability-focused brand to one that emphasizes comfort could open new avenues. Developing and patenting exceptional soles, akin to On Running’s CloudTec, could help Allbirds regain a foothold in the market. This focus on comfort, combined with its existing commitment to sustainability, could potentially redefine its brand identity and appeal to a broader consumer base. This strategic shift requires not only technological innovation but also a deep understanding of consumer preferences and market trends.

Asia As The Next Emerging Market For Running

Asia’s burgeoning market for running and athletic footwear presents significant growth opportunities for brands like On Running and Allbirds. The impact of this growth on comfort categories can be substantial, offering new avenues for market expansion and product innovation. Here are a few key points:

Rising Health Consciousness: In many Asian countries, there’s a growing trend towards health and wellness. This shift is driving an increase in activities like running, which in turn boosts the demand for high-quality running shoes. Brands that can tap into this health-conscious market with products that offer both performance and comfort are likely to see success.

Expanding Middle Class: Asia’s expanding middle class is fueling consumer spending on lifestyle and wellness products, including athletic footwear. This demographic is not only looking for functional products but also values comfort and style, blending their needs for athletic and casual footwear.

Urbanization and Lifestyle Changes: Rapid urbanization across Asia has led to lifestyle changes that blend fitness activities with daily life. As a result, there’s a growing preference for versatile footwear that serves both athletic and casual purposes, which is where the comfort category can greatly benefit.

Online Retail and Digital Engagement: The superiority of eCommerce platforms in Asia offers brands an effective channel to reach a broader audience. These platforms also provide valuable consumer data, enabling brands to tailor their products and marketing strategies to local preferences, including comfort-oriented features.

Cultural Trends and Brand Perception: In many Asian markets, Western brands are often perceived as status symbols. Brands like On Running and Allbirds can leverage this perception, emphasizing their unique value propositions in comfort and sustainability to appeal to a wide range of consumers.

Influence on Comfort Categories: The emphasis on running and athletic footwear in Asia is likely to have a trickle-down effect on comfort categories. Consumers who prioritize performance in their athletic wear also seek comfort in their everyday footwear. This overlap creates opportunities for brands to develop products that cater to both needs.

Asia’s growing market for running and athletic footwear is the key area for future growth in this segment, with significant implications for the comfort category. Both can effectively tap into this market by balancing performance, comfort, and style, and adapting to local preferences, stand to gain a significant competitive advantage in this rapidly evolving market landscape.

Allbirds will need to refocus on its core strengths while also innovating in product comfort and performance. Developing and patenting new technologies for soles, similar to On Running’s approach, could help turn it around. This strategic shift should be accompanied by a renewed focus on understanding and catering to its target segments’ needs, particularly around comfort, sustainability, and performance.

The stories of On Running and Allbirds in the athletic footwear industry offer valuable lessons in brand positioning, market segmentation, and the importance of aligning product offerings with consumer expectations. While On Running has successfully navigated these challenges, Allbirds has faced hurdles. However, with the strategic pivot mentioned above, Allbirds could potentially reclaim its position in the market. In the same New Yorker article, Syme wrote: “I have never been the kind of person who selects my shoes based on their orthopedic function.” The irony for high flying running shoe brands like Hoka and On is that this was their appeal before appeal was their appeal. And with that, more consumers prioritized comfort over appearance. Even Adidas and Nike have taken note.

Over four years, emerging sportswear companies Hoka and On Running spent the equivalent of what Nike spends in two weeks to grow their market shares — and added $3 billion worth of revenue over that period, according to TD Cowen. (Business Insider, 2023)

Allbirds can learn from this. Nike is focused on China to continue growing market share. The athletic footwear industry continues to evolve, and brands that can adapt to changing consumer preferences while maintaining a clear and consistent brand identity are likely to succeed in this competitive landscape. This is the tale of the two DTCs. 

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes,美术:Alex Remy 和 Christina Williams

成员简介:全渠道涅槃

双方都在寻求全渠道的涅槃。

耐克公司专注于其直接面向消费者的战略,在这一过程中伤害了百货商店和专卖店,而 Allbirds 则与批发商亲密合作。在考虑品牌知名度和单位经济效益的全渠道战略中,这是一个有趣的悖论。拥有销售速度和地位的品牌可以并将会转向自有商店/DTC 模式。努力实现盈利并扩大规模的品牌则转向第三方零售批发合作。

一个循环似乎正在形成:通过与批发商合作达到临界质量的数字原生品牌和传统品牌,最终可能会放弃数字优先战略。

这只是 DTC 玩法脆弱状态的又一个迹象,也是当前影响零售业的宏观趋势。自发布以来的短短一周内,本周二下午 2 点前概述的两个关键商务趋势及其连锁反应开始实时上演。摘自数字商务全球峰会演讲:

实体到数字:零售商从第三方零售商撤出

对于各种规模和地位的品牌来说,一个主要的战略是有意识地精心创建一个批发网络,以便控制库存和建立合作伙伴关系,而不是像过去几代人那样采用喷洒和喷洒的零售方式。随着品牌专注于自有渠道,第三方零售商所扮演的角色将越来越小,也将与以往不同。这就是一个很好的例子:到 2027 年,耐克的直销比例将达到 70%。

从数字到实体:DNVB 正在开放自有购物体验

对于网络品牌来说,扩张正在店铺层面进行。实体店提升了品牌的网络光环,如果做得好,还能赚钱。风险在于避免过度零售。随着这种扩张,商场也将按照 DTC 的形象进行改造。

Allbirds 本周的财报显示,该公司需要重新考虑其实体店和批发战略。据 CNBC 报道,该品牌公布的成本增加侵蚀了利润,导致股价下跌。开设零售店是一项主要支出。为了收回销售额,Allbirds 表示将通过第三方零售商进行销售,并指定 Nordstrom 为其批发合作伙伴。WWD 最近的一篇文章对此作了解释:

Zwillinger 说,公司将主要在美国和少数欧洲零售商中开展批发业务,未来还计划在亚洲开设分店。他说,这些商店将无法获得 Allbirds 的全部产品,只能选择最适合其细分市场的产品。Zwillinger 说,为了保持 Allbirds 过去五年来一直保持的定价完整性,他们在促销时销售的产品将受到限制。

为了回归其 DTC 根源,Allbirds 需要发展业务,建立更强大的品牌资产,同时保持首席执行官 Joey Zwillinger 在对 WWD 的评论中提到的单位经济效益(定价完整性)。耐克拥有长达几十年的优势,这种比较并不公平,但这种逆转正是耐克目前重建分销模式的方式。据 NPD 集团称,耐克与阿迪达斯和斯凯奇一样,都是自己最好的零售渠道。

耐克的直接零售战略庞大而细致,将商店概念、游戏、应用程序和 Web 3.0 都考虑在内。耐克计划在每一次互动中都拥有顾客,这对依赖耐克的零售商造成了伤害。鞋业新闻》(Footwear News)援引了耐克总部整合分销的紧迫性

对于耐克来说,积极的 DTC 战略导致该品牌终止了与 Zappos、Dillard's、DSW、Urban Outfitters、Shoe Show 等零售商的批发账户,使许多零售商无法在店内销售最受欢迎的品牌之一。耐克还削减了在现有供应商(如 Foot Locker)的产品数量,以巩固分销。

由于失去了耐克的部分门店,Foot Locker 公司报告的前景黯淡,股价下跌。而其他零售商,如 DSW、Urban Outfitters 和 Shoe Show,在耐克离开的消息传出后也面临着类似的市场压力。在品牌经历自身周期的同时,依靠品牌的商店也在经历自身的复兴。对大多数人来说,这既不是厄运,也不是阴霾。

如果我的假设是正确的,那么最大、最成熟的零售商留下的全渠道空白将由Allbirds和NOBULL这样的新兴现代品牌来填补。5年、10年或20年后,这些现代品牌可能会写下同样的故事,来展望自己的未来--这就是品牌、实体零售商和不断发展的分销战略之间共生关系的新形态。

一方面:盈利的传统企业品牌因放弃批发而转向 DTC 而成为新闻焦点。另一端:尚未盈利的数字原生品牌则因转向百货公司批发以寻求利润和规模而成为新闻焦点。

它们都在努力实现全渠道的涅槃。

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes,美术:Christina Williams

备忘录GoPuff 和基本

当零售商推出自有品牌时,意味着他们已经达到了临界质量。根据Placer.ai的数据,Gopuff 推出 "Basically "可谓恰逢其时。

通过观察那些正在积极扩张店铺的公司,我们可以对零售业和现代消费者的现状有很多了解。Placer.ai的最新数据显示,2022 年十大零售商的扩张计划值得关注。这份榜单包括快餐连锁店、一元店分拆和店中店合作,证实了当今顾客在有理由光顾实体店时会被吸引到实体店,而最了解当前消费趋势的公司才能提供最好的服务:最能体现这一趋势的公司是那些最了解当前消费趋势的公司:DTC、分叉、即时配送和便利性。

榜单中最引人注目的是 Gopuff,该公司在建立了以超快送货为基础的业务后,将其一些微型配送网站变成了客户网点。据路透社报道,Gopuff 已聘请银行帮助其上市,估值接近 150 亿美元,预计将于今年首次公开募股。实体店可以把顾客带到配送点,缩短工人把商品送到顾客家中的时间,从而使 Gopuff 的配送速度更快。这些商店不是典型的便利店,而是订货中心,顾客使用数字亭下订单,然后由仓库发货。为了推动这一全渠道战略,GoPuff 通过抢地盘的方式收购了多家公司,目前已收购了 161 家 BevMo 商店和 23 家 Liquor Barns。

Gopuff 模式实现了 Target 等零售商试图改造其门店以达到的目标:作为订单履行中心,同时可持续地为现场和在线客户提供服务,实现无缝对接。瞬时送达数据表明,Gopuff 并没有优化 15 分钟以内的送达时间:

通过将零售业务建立在送货业务的基础上,Gopuff 已经准备好满足顾客的购物需求:在线购物、在家购物、即时送货,或者在顾客已经出门、购物更方便或希望避免额外费用的情况下亲自购物。

通过外卖和实体零售让顾客养成 Gopuff 的习惯,将使这家成立九年的公司独树一帜。随着 Basically(Gopuff 的自有品牌)的推出,以及只有 DoorDash 的 Dashmart 才能在功能上与之相媲美的店内模式,Gopuff 可以证明自己为何能在未来几年引领便利外卖市场。根据 YipitData 的数据,截至目前,DoorDash 以 45% 的份额领先于 Gopuff 的 23%。Instacart和Uber的市场份额分别为16%和15%。

这可能是,也应该是,给那些慢慢转向送货上门的杂货店和连锁便利店敲响了警钟。摘自 Grocery Dive:

Gopuff 几乎不是第一家进军实体店的在线零售商,它是亚马逊(Amazon)等大型公司和 Warby Parker 等小众公司中的一员。这凸显了实体店和点击对于公司零售战略的重要性,即使大流行病促进了网上购物。但是,在杂货店和便利店中,为店内购物者提供严格的数字订购模式是独一无二的,而且可能被证明是对购物者对便利性和商店体验期望的一次有益测试。

值得关注的不仅仅是 Gopuff 的实体零售战略。

DTC 品牌是新的商场品牌。 Placer.ai 还列出了 Warby Parker 和 Allbirds,这两家公司都是去年上市的。增加门店是这两个 DTC 品牌计划中不可或缺的一部分,因为它们是巨大的赚钱工具,同时在门店和网上购物的顾客比只在网上购物的顾客消费更多。在上周关于 Glossier、Skims 和 Savage x Fenty 的会员简报中,我解释了这一点:

商场需要他们,他们通过精明的营销和人们想要购买的产品,有效地建立了热情的顾客群。

这同样适用于 Allbirds 和 Warby,它们代表了商场零售业的未来:它们在网上拥有足够多的追随者,顾客会主动找上门来,而且它们都在努力建立足够的全国零售网络,让现有消费者能够更冲动地购买(自有零售的好处之一)。此外,它们还能以更低的成本获得顾客,因为新顾客是通过更有效的渠道认识它们的。

美容是销售的驱动力,但仅限于某些零售商。Ulta 和丝芙兰垄断了店内的美妆产品,损害了百货公司的利益。那些赢得了它们生意的零售商则从它们作为美妆爱好者零售目的地的地位中获益。Placer.ai 发现,在科尔(Kohl's)百货公司内设有丝芙兰专卖店的店铺比没有丝芙兰专卖店的店铺吸引了更多的人流。塔吉特(Target)在与 Ulta 建立了成功的合作关系后,正在扩大合作范围。更有趣的是在线领域的发展,这让 Glossier 感到非常失望

请注意,在美容领域,人们的偏好已经从品牌电子商务转向了市场电子商务。随着丝芙兰(Sephora)、Ulta 和沃尔玛(Walmart)等公司的电商业务不断增长,Glossier 也避免了与它们的合作(包括店内和数字营销)。沃尔玛在过去的 12 个月里招募了近 100 个美容品牌,Ulta 与 Target 合作,而丝芙兰则在 Kohl's 内。

零售商正在追随消费者的分化。 Placer.ai 名单上的两个品牌 Arhaus 和 pOpshelf 反映了消费者持续分化的趋势。家具品牌 Arhaus 瞄准高收入家庭,尤其是郊区的高收入家庭,作为 RH 的替代品,迄今已开设了 70 家门店和展厅。与此同时,pOpshelf 是 Dollar General 的衍生品牌,旨在吸引更富裕、更年轻的郊区购物者,这些人对 Dollar General 不屑一顾,但对 TJ Maxx 等商店的寻宝式购物体验情有独钟。

底线是什么?随着在线业务不强、品牌相关性较低的零售商收缩版图,过度扩张的零售商仍在进行 "权利调整"。等待它们的将是一类更贴近当今消费者的新型零售商,它们的首要竞争优势是店面的数字化创新和全渠道的知名度。

互联网重塑了阶级和富裕阶层的购物方式。Placer.ai 的数据显示,电子商务对零售地产的影响似乎有多大。

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes,美术:Alex Remy 和 Christina Williams