Memo: RokuMart

We often choose what’s in front of us. This is the bet that Roku is making on both media and online retail.

Retail Media Networks are at the forefront of merchandising and performance marketing. Roku is months into quietly developing an approach of its own. Two principles that we’ve researched here in the past may be combining to form the future of shoppable commerce. To accomplish this, Roku must first become platform agnostic, at least from a content perspective.

The 1990s saw the peak of cable television’s rule. Today’s market fragmentation is a product of the cable industry’s early indifference towards streaming. Nearly 15 years later and the media property has its own Netflix competitor. As a result, we have an unlimited amount of big budget streaming content. We’re beginning to see narratives like these: Amazon’s latest Lord of the Rings project losing to HBO Max’s Game of Thrones prequel (of sorts). But consumers are also paying for multiple services, often paying more than they would have if cable television was their primary source of consumption. While there are no plans to address the rising costs of maintaining multiple streaming subscriptions, Roku seems the closest to addressing the need for curating content in a platform-agnostic fashion. Consider what we’ve written about the beginning of the market fragmentation that we know today in the context of streaming:

Market fragmentation is accelerating and while the economics may work for popular individual creators, it may not be what’s best for the industry as a whole. The streaming and the eCommerce industries seem to be inching towards a parallel path to consolidation. It’s a privilege that we once took for granted, whether in the context of streaming content, packaged goods, and fashion retail: it was easier to decide what to buy when our choices were in front of us. We spent much less time searching and more time discovering. Before, the burden rested with the marketplace to do the discovering and curating for the consumer. We browsed cable channels and a centralized guide of programs. We window shopped in malls and roamed the aisles of places like Walmart, Target, CostCo, BestBuy, and Sam’s Club.

By the time that Netflix broke into streaming (2007), obvious cracks began to form in cable’s facade. It was no longer the home of all of the content that you were interested in. Friends were binging Netflix shows while you were watching that episode of Friends for the seventh time. In parallel, retailers like Walmart featured products that you needed. A new generation of modern retailers launched their own sites (with the help of platforms like Shopify), hoping to build a direct-to-consumer business in an efficient manner. For some of those brands, it worked. For most, it did not. Market fragmentation, in both media and retail, seemed to occur in tandem.

Consumers are yearning for a central depository of content and Roku seems to be focused on setting aside its own brand of content (Roku Media) to curate the rest, accomplishing this sought after goal for viewers. It just so happens that consumers also seem to want to rely on traditional marketplace systems of purchasing physical goods. Walmart is back in fashion and the timing couldn’t be better for Roku, Walmart, or the hundreds of brands looking for a new, efficient marketing channel.

As reported by TechCrunch, Roku’s recent announcement addresses the first problem (curation vs. fragmentation) head on:

Roku today unveiled the features it has in store for the next version of its media software, Roku OS 11.5. This time around, the platform maker is looking to advance its own offerings, like its Live TV experience, as well as better cater to viewers who are struggling to keep up with a range of film and TV content across a growing number of streaming services with new features like an expanded universal watch list, a platform-wide “continue watching” feature, and a new discovery center called “The Buzz,” featuring short-form content.

And here is why curation is important. Roku spends on content but not like the other platforms. While Netflix and Amazon have Oscars and multi-billion content budgets, Roku has chosen to invest in a manner that resembles the cable systems of old.

With its own discovery platform, The Buzz, Roku wants to take a more active role in curating the content it carries via its streaming channels and helping users decide what to watch. The platform will carry short-form content like clips, trailers and other videos from partners including AMC+, Apple TV+, BET Plus, Crackle, Hallmark Movies Now, IGN, Plex, Popcornflix, Showtime, Starz, The CW, Tubi, Vevo, and Wondrium. The goal is to get new shows and movies in front of users, who can like posts, follow profiles and save things to watch later in the app. It’s paired with new features including a save list and continue watching, making it easier to navigate to programs and shows on the Roku platform without visiting individual apps.

As The Verge reports, the discovery platform’s utility will vary by user, but the idea is to offer a more personalized experience as it gets to know individual preferences over time. Its success will also depend on streaming services’ willingness to play ball: if a big player is missing from the lineup, that will leave a hole in Roku’s ability to show users all of the content that it can offer. Some streaming services may find it useful in order to promote their content, but the big guns like Netflix and Disney+ may not feel as if they need to do so. Ultimately, what Roku wants to do is be the conduit that people use to find the content they want to watch, be it through early discovery or picking back up on what they’re in the middle of as easy as possible. Roku’s own content is taking a back seat, something that might bode well for streaming services’ willingness to work with it.

Roku will also launch new technologies atop its existing self-serve ad platform. An earlier article from June explains why curation and interface are so important to Roku (and why its ceded billion-dollar content budgets to other platforms). It wants to make shoppable advertising the future of streaming content. And while Prime TV and Amazon Prime would make sense as the de facto leader in this retail / media merge, its Roku’s interface and Walmart’s partnership that make Roku the new leader. This is happening at an interesting time for Retail Media Networks. Twenty-eight of the top performing applications, according to Search Engine Land, have already begun building PPC tools for the top retail media networks:

The Roku x Walmart partnership, which was formed in June, is a first-of-its-kind effort to unite streaming and shopping. Walmart is the exclusive retail partner of Roku, and streamers can become shoppers with a few clicks of their remote while they’re watching something in which shoppable products are featured. The point is for it to become second nature by making it easy to checkout. According to Progressive Grocer:

Viewers just press “OK” with their remote on a shoppable ad and move to checkout, with their payment details pre-populated from Roku Pay, Roku’s payments platform. Once there, tapping “OK” on the Walmart checkout page places the order. A Walmart purchase confirmation is then emailed with shipping, return and support information.

Roku already has a built-in payments system to allow viewers to buy streaming-related and subscription purchases in the app. The retail component is an extension of that, and brands, marketers, and the broader industry will be watching to see how it lands with customers. Do people watching an ad on TV jump that quickly to making a purchase? Roku will find out. The efficacy of the shoppable ads will be measured by the company’s in-house team. Its brand studio will also work with marketers to create the right ads for the platform.

Roku’s ambitions to be a streaming media curator may foretell the future of content platforms in the streaming age. Roku has the content, it’s now building a universe where people can watch movie trailers, save content lists, and more easily navigate the often overwhelming world of streaming. Whether or not that’s where people also want to shop will remain to be seen, but the investment in the ad platform has the makings of a new sort of new retail media network at work.

वेब स्मिथ द्वारा | हिलेरी मिल्नेस द्वारा संपादित, एलेक्स रेमी और क्रिस्टीना विलियम्स द्वारा कला

Memo: A Hero’s Acquisition

Direct-to-consumer and growth, growth, growth. That was the narrative that overwhelmed modern retail over the previous decade-plus. Today the narrative is rewriting itself right in front of our eyes. Forget pure-play “DTC”, Amazon-hesitancy, and tech-like valuations. The mega brands (or at least, the brands behind the mega deals) of the next 10 years will be built using a playbook that emphasizes EBITDA margin, profitability, and a more holistic distribution strategy.

Hero Cosmetics is the latest example of how to win in this new environment, with its recently announced acquisition. It confirmed that the days of growth-alone have ceded to the retail principles that defined the previous century before it.

On Tuesday in an exclusive, WWD announced that Hero Cosmetics, which is most well-known for its acne treatment products, was acquired by consumer goods company Church & Dwight (C&D) after a year that has seen 40% growth over the previous year’s revenue totals. The product (Hero) / market (C&D) fit couldn’t be better. Founded in 1847, the conglomerate now boasts 10 divisions, each of which should be familiar: Orajel, Arm & Hammer, Nair, First Response, OxiClean, Toppik, Water Pik, and Pepsodent. The New Jersey-based company’s introduction to cosmetics is Hero; in the trailing 12 months, C&D earned $5.2 billion and Hero is likely to become a key player in the conglomerate’s goal to exceed $6 billion in annual sales.

A Glossy report from February 2022 cited the brand’s launch in Ulta after earning a $100 million run rate. Just seven months later, the brand reported that it was on track to reach $140 million in sales in 2022, up from $100 million last year. This was good enough for a $630 million deal. Hero earned the upper end of the acquisition valuation matrix, in my opinion: 14x multiple on its $45 million EBITDA over the trailing 12 months. CEO Ju Rhyu told Forbes:

We expect that we’ll accelerate some of our growth plans, like continued US expansion and growing our international footprint, while tapping into some of Church & Dwight’s infrastructure and back office capabilities. This acquisition with Church & Dwight marks a huge milestone in our company’s history and I am so excited to unlock more growth with them.

In addition to its best-selling patches, Hero currently sells acne serums and creams as well as a body care line. The company’s capital raised to date included a 2021 minority investment from Aria Growth Partners for an undisclosed sum. This was after a 2020 that saw 300% growth.

Early on, Hero Cosmetics embraced Amazon to grow its business, bucking the belief of so many modern companies that Amazon is a brand-killer.

It first sold on Amazon starting in 2017, then it became available in retailers including Target, CVS, Neiman Marcus, Ulta and Urban Outfitters – now in 8,000 total doors in the US – then, a year later it launched its own direct-to-consumer site, a well-built Shopify Plus site featuring 79 technologies. But the company’s biggest draw is one of its fewer than 40 SKUs. The Mighty Patch has become the number one beauty product on Amazon, according to Marketplace Pulse. Rhyu, who will stay on following the acquisition, said that Amazon was the perfect launch platform because it was a fast, easy and cheap place to test product-market fit. Only once tested was Rhyu comfortable expanding Hero’s distribution through brick-and-mortar and owned channels.

Is the pure-play DTC era conceding to omnichannel nirvana? Other brands have followed a similar path, according to Marketplace Pulse filings, including: Anker, Zesty Paws and SmartyPants (the latter two were also acquired for exits in the excess of $500 million). Peloton recently said it would start selling on Amazon, where its bikes are often searched for. A sea change is starting. As 2PM wrote at the time of the Peloton news:

Amazon is the number one search engine for products, so eventually, every brand will seek out its marketplace reach. It only makes sense that a brand desperate for a resurgence of its own has taken a shot and proving Amazon’s reach and effectiveness.

In a recent report on DTC brands’ migration to online marketplaces, we explained that: “The marketplace model will become more relevant for digitally-native brands as eCommerce continues to evolve and lines blur. The most capable retailers will reach customers where they are.”

In retail’s battle of Davids versus Goliaths, it may seem that upstart brands recognizing they need the Amazon machine in order to succeed is a sign of defeat. It’s more so a reality check, and the best brands will still rise above the noise of Amazon to grow outside of it, rather than get washed away in Amazon’s tides. There are still valid concerns over how Amazon uses and abuses the data it garners from brands that sell on its site, but the best brands’ products will always outshine Amazon knockoffs. It’s the difference between standing out in a crowded room and isolating yourself to your own corner. DTC pure-plays have always had to fight it out for attention as evidenced by the industry’s reliance on marketing via Facebook, Instagram, and Google. The flaws in that model have become clear.

What can other brands learn from this acquisition? Here is a recap of what we have said in previous reports. There are factors to consider including: product category, price range, perishable / non-perishable, and consumer positioning (mid-market, luxury, etc). No brand should remain a pure-play, direct-to-consumer brand unless they maintain the profits and operations to support that decision. Selling direct is extremely expensive and more rare than any new-age marketer would like to believe. In contrast, going where customers are is a traditionally profitable proposition. A loss-making DTC brand is not nobler than a profitable wholesale brand.

Soon, DTC-as-strategy will become a relic of a past era of retail that was riding high on venture dollars and Facebook arbitrage. The brands are returning home to retailers, while using tools at their disposable to drive up their brand equity so when people see their product on a Target or Nordstrom shelf, or in Amazon’s sea of products, they choose it.

Report by Web Smith | Edited by Hilary Milnes with art by Alex Remy and Christina Williams

Memo: All About RMN

First-party data is defining this era of advertising and sales. Companies are now in a race against time: they’ll build, acquire, or market to the platforms that have it.

When Facebook revolutionized advertising for early direct-to-consumer brands in 2011-2014, a volume of eyeballs preceded its advertising technology push. Facebook was built atop its user volume, human capital. For Google, a volume of searches preceded its advertising technology push. Google was also built on the byproduct of its user inquiries. But this is the era of user privacy and the end of third-party data – both were commonly used by Facebook and Google. Today, retail sales data is what supplies first-party collection. It is the most important asset in digital marketing today. First-party data precedes today’s advertising arbitrage.

Advertising is being transformed by commerce media, a new form of advertising that closes the loop between media impressions and commerce transactions to improve targeting, provide new audience insights, and deliver more relevant and valuable experiences for consumers.

Consider the following analogy. Crude oil is collected and sent to a furnace, heating to 750 degrees. Then, a refinery separates that asset into useful substances like: diesel fuel, gasoline, kerosene, motor oil, asphalt, and candles. That raw substance is refined in what’s known as a distillation column. As we explained in 2PM’s first foray into the study of first-party data: “it is the substance that fills the distillation column of today, retail media networks process that oil-like first-party data into key assets.” For a retailer seeking new demand generation, ad platforms supplied by first-party data are like the oil refineries of today. Yes, this is a play on British Mathematician Clive Humby’s 2006 proclamation: data is the new oil. In this case, it is.

Retail media networks (RMN) are finding themselves in position to attract the advertising dollars that might have previously been spent with platforms like Facebook and Google. They are accomplishing this massive growth by way of droves of first-party customer data troves.

We’re going to focus on the number one RMN: Amazon. It has been able to develop its own self-serve advertising business and in doing so, it’s inspired other retailers to do the same. Amazon’s is the blueprint, raking in $31 billion as of 2021. Walmart brought in a paltry $2.1 billion in ad revenue and Apple’s RMN has recently eclipsed that of Snapchat and TikTok with similar fundamentals.

Expect that RMNs will grow in popularity as Meta’s workarounds for data collection falter; we are already seeing this with Meta’s in-app browsers. In “Trojan Ad Data,” we explained: “Instagram, which has been building up its own shopping capabilities and lets users swipe up on ads to shop from inside the app, can track user data when they’re using the in-app browser by injecting code into URLs that tracks your searches by recording your keyboard inputs, a practice called keylogging. This workaround skirts Apple’s own ATT feature, as well Safari’s third-party cookie security.”

Retailers are dealing with supply chain backlogs, inventory challenges, recessionary forces, and unpredictable consumer demand. For mass market marketplace retailers like Amazon, Walmart, and (in its own way) Apple: advertising revenue is a reliable way to carry high margin revenues to the bottom line. On the other side: brand marketers are grappling with the ramifications of Apple’s privacy restrictions, which have cut off third-party data via apps like Facebook that used to inform high-return advertising strategies.

In a sense, today’s market and economy have influenced the perfect storm for the rise of the retail media network, which has up until now been growing quietly. From Fast Company:

A recession is bound to affect ad budgets across the board. But tighter tracking rules might make the data that retailers amass even more valuable to advertisers.

Retailers stumbled upon a gold mine; there isn’t better targeting data than a retail conversion (or an acquisition of the company with troves of their own first-party data). And now what Amazon has is worth even more to brands who are reconfiguring their performance marketing strategies in light of Apple’s privacy changes. DTC companies were built with the hope of growing independently of America’s largest retail marketplaces but retail media networks like Amazon’s, Target’s, and Walmart’s have already begun to contribute to many of these same brands setting aside idealism for growth. Amazon is already a top three advertiser with Facebook’s current ad model degrading by the quarter. Apple was a surprise entry and the Cupertino-based company will soon have an advertising business that is larger than Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok, or Pinterest. Apple’s privacy practices are to thank:

Within these retail media networks, brands can research consumer brand preferences, demographic data assigned to product loyalty, or what products and brands customers are searching for within their categories. Brand marketers can then programmatically buy their ad positions.

As the cookie crumbles, brands believe the modern retail media network can offer strategic change in the commerce experience (both online and offline) by: Influencing customers at the “digital shelf” point of consideration, offering lower-funnel advertising opportunities to fill the gap left by cookies, and delivering performance insights to improve their return on media investment. (via Broadsign)

In the best cases, retail media networks can make the online shopping experience more relevant to customers. Avoiding the sacrificing of integrity as ads become more prevalent will become the balancing act for these retailers-turned-advertisers as they find themselves on the receiving end of larger and larger marketing budgets.

Apple’s privacy practices may push more brands into the arms of Amazon (see: Peloton, who will now be able to appear in search results) as retailers of its size and scope look for first-party solutions to third-party data shortfalls. Walmart, who is much earlier along in its path to becoming a big three advertiser, released a statement to Fast Company:

Marketers want and need to connect more directly with customers. To do that – they need to know their customers better, the key for that is first party data. […] Large retailers, like Walmart, sit on a gold mine of first-party retail-powered data.

Thirty years ago, a brand needed a mass-market retailer like Walmart to be seen by consumers. Twenty years ago, a brand eschewed this relationship to go direct-to-consumer with the help of demographics data from platforms like Google and Facebook. Now, these DTC companies may be doing away with the need for independence altogether. It was mostly a façade anyway. Brands may or may not remain (exclusively) direct-to-consumer as the market continues to evolve away from that decade-long strategy but the advertising data used by these brands will be direct-from-consumer. We’re just beginning to see how impactful retail media networks may become for retailers looking to reignite growth after a turbulent, post-pandemic period of reversion.

वेब स्मिथ द्वारा | हिलेरी मिल्नेस द्वारा संपादित, एलेक्स रेमी और क्रिस्टीना विलियम्स द्वारा कला