备忘录博尔特的大胆策略

It may not work but it’s a gutsy strategy. Bolt is trying to out-rebel the armory of the rebels. The call to action is clear: “Switch to Bolt.” In another fiery thread by Bolt founder Ryan Breslow, he began: Shopify is eating their ecosystem.

Ryan Breslow 🕺 on Twitter: “Shopify is Eating their Ecosystem (thread): / Twitter”

Shopify is Eating their Ecosystem (thread):

Just two days after, in a sponsored article published in Retail Dive on Monday, Bolt challenged Shopify directly. The headline “Has your online shop outgrown Shopify?” insinuates a new direction taken by Breslow and team. It’s now a rivalry stoked by a chairman of the checkout platform now valued at over $11 billion by investors. A click-through link titled “Tired of Shopify holding you back?” drove the message home.

  • top of funnel: viral thread
  • mid-funnel: topical sponsored article
  • bottom funnel: custom landing page to capture interest

Bolt wants to take on Shopify, transitioning from a one-click checkout tool to a full-fledged eCommerce platform. The landing page that Retail Dive sends readers to leaves no question unanswered:

Take back control of your store with Bolt CheckoutOS, the checkout partner that scales with you. Switch from Shopify for a flexible commerce solution and get up to $2M in incentives and marketing funds.

The thread, sponsored article, and the landing pages are all part of the new approach to growth that Bolt is relying on to reach its goals. The $11 billion valuation is hefty, especially given that Shopify competitor BigCommerce is trading at below a $2 billion market capitalization. According to filings, Bolt’s total revenue for 2021 was expected to be between $216.2 million and $216.6 million with a Non-GAAP operating loss of $19-20 million.

The thread headlines a repositioning strategy that may be designed to help Bolt stretch its total addressable market (TAM).

In the viral thread, Breslow says that Shopify copied Bolt when it launched Shop Pay. He also says that Shopify uses its positioning in the market and app store to bring in developers to build solutions for its clients, uses the app landscape as its own R&D and then manipulates app store restrictions to cut off the most popular apps at their knees and recreate the product themselves.

Breslow has become known for fiery tweet storms targeting powerful industry players. His last, which challenged YCombinator, came shortly before he stepped down as Bolt’s CEO (a choice he said was his own). In that thread, Breslow said his Twitter threads were not a marketing strategy. At least in the Shopify case, the tweets accompanied by the sponsored article seem coordinated. Bolt wants to become a Shopify competitor, and this narrative shift around Bolt’s own positioning (while pointing out the weaknesses of Shopify) were clearly planned.

This move to take on Shopify could boost Bolt’s business from one-trick tech company. Bolt’s current valuation underscores just how valuable checkout solutions have become. But to earn its valuation (and eventually grow beyond it) its next chapter has to be bigger. This is the impetus behind its growing value proposition. It now bills itself as a “CheckoutOS.” Bolt isn’t the only company that started in one corner of eCommerce tech and is looking at what other areas it can conquer in order to raise its own ceiling. But becoming the next Shopify is a tall order. Can Bolt achieve it without eventually using the same tactics as Shopify to grow users?

Right now, Bolt is suggesting it can be a home for both growing businesses as well as app developers who may have been burned by Shopify. The bottom line of Breslow’s argument is that eCommerce should be open-source. Bolt sees itself as a leading candidate in the version of eCommerce that is now inhabited by companies like BigCommerce, Magento, and Commerce Cloud – where commerce scale is decentralized because of open platform access. It wants to not only compete with Shopify, but replace it with a new model. However, Wall Street is still catching up to Shopify.

Shopify is down 57 percent over the trailing three months. Unlike Amazon, who found ways to calm the Street while reinvesting in future growth, Shopify has not been able to weave the same “we’re just beginning” narrative. Shopify needs quarterly growth to justify its market cap and to achieve that, it will have to own more and more of the ecosystem until the eCommerce industry matures beyond its currently nascent stage. Wall Street sees online retail as an industry in post-COVID retraction, further agitated by Apple’s privacy policies impacting the Facebook advertising that many retailers relied upon. Look at how reliant Shopify is on Facebook’s marketing prowess:

Speaking anonymously (with permission to share his thoughts), a Shopify executive contested my view that product decisions are made with the public market in mind. No one in Shopify’s leadership “optimizes for Wall Street,” he said. Rather, the Shopify executive explained that simplicity is prioritized. Products are concluded because they are not good for merchants, consumers, or the ecosystem as a whole.

A product manager also reached out to explain the unique role of checkout within the Shopify ecosystem. End to end control is critical, it’s “the most important piece of commerce.” And as Shopify continues to scale, the company wants control over the most critical point of the consumer workflow.

So while Shopify isn’t publicly weaving the narrative that its Amazonian rival did in its first 15 years, the management team is still playing by the same book: ruthlessly thinking for the long-term even throughout global and societal changes.

The ultimate irony of Bolt’s new strategy of antagonizing Shopify (like Shopify antagonizes Amazon) is simple. Shopify is slowly becoming more like Amazon to capture more share of eCommerce growth. If Bolt wants to compete against Shopify in other platforms, they will eventually adapt the same practices: picking and choosing between who gets to work within its ecosystem. When Bolt went after YCombinator, I wondered if the leadership team sanctioned the controversial statements made by Ryan Breslow. By taking aim at Shopify and backing it up with sponsored articles and thematic landing pages, it’s clear that the new marketing and public relations strategy has been sanctioned by the company. It has elevated Bolt in the eCommerce discussion. It’s set the stage for merchants and developers to see Bolt through the lens of larger aspirations.

Breslow sees Bolt as the third-generation of commerce enablers, a position shared by a number of headless competitors including its rival Fast.

But while the marketing strategy seems effective thus far, scale is a risky proposition. As Breslow correctly notes, there is a “success ceiling.” To break through the glass, you may end up making as many enemies as you do partners. If Bolt succeeds, it will have its own viral threads from younger, ambitious entrepreneurs to contend with. They’ll talk of the next generation and the right way to do things. And if they’re lucky, they’ll see the success ceiling too and adjust their strategies accordingly. It may lead to a bit of compromise. It may not work but it’s a gutsy strategy.

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes,美术:Alex Remy 和 Christina Williams 

成员简介:全渠道涅槃

双方都在寻求全渠道的涅槃。

耐克公司专注于其直接面向消费者的战略,在这一过程中伤害了百货商店和专卖店,而 Allbirds 则与批发商亲密合作。在考虑品牌知名度和单位经济效益的全渠道战略中,这是一个有趣的悖论。拥有销售速度和地位的品牌可以并将会转向自有商店/DTC 模式。努力实现盈利并扩大规模的品牌则转向第三方零售批发合作。

一个循环似乎正在形成:通过与批发商合作达到临界质量的数字原生品牌和传统品牌,最终可能会放弃数字优先战略。

这只是 DTC 玩法脆弱状态的又一个迹象,也是当前影响零售业的宏观趋势。自发布以来的短短一周内,本周二下午 2 点前概述的两个关键商务趋势及其连锁反应开始实时上演。摘自数字商务全球峰会演讲:

实体到数字:零售商从第三方零售商撤出

对于各种规模和地位的品牌来说,一个主要的战略是有意识地精心创建一个批发网络,以便控制库存和建立合作伙伴关系,而不是像过去几代人那样采用喷洒和喷洒的零售方式。随着品牌专注于自有渠道,第三方零售商所扮演的角色将越来越小,也将与以往不同。这就是一个很好的例子:到 2027 年,耐克的直销比例将达到 70%。

从数字到实体:DNVB 正在开放自有购物体验

对于网络品牌来说,扩张正在店铺层面进行。实体店提升了品牌的网络光环,如果做得好,还能赚钱。风险在于避免过度零售。随着这种扩张,商场也将按照 DTC 的形象进行改造。

Allbirds 本周的财报显示,该公司需要重新考虑其实体店和批发战略。据 CNBC 报道,该品牌公布的成本增加侵蚀了利润,导致股价下跌。开设零售店是一项主要支出。为了收回销售额,Allbirds 表示将通过第三方零售商进行销售,并指定 Nordstrom 为其批发合作伙伴。WWD 最近的一篇文章对此作了解释:

Zwillinger 说,公司将主要在美国和少数欧洲零售商中开展批发业务,未来还计划在亚洲开设分店。他说,这些商店将无法获得 Allbirds 的全部产品,只能选择最适合其细分市场的产品。Zwillinger 说,为了保持 Allbirds 过去五年来一直保持的定价完整性,他们在促销时销售的产品将受到限制。

为了回归其 DTC 根源,Allbirds 需要发展业务,建立更强大的品牌资产,同时保持首席执行官 Joey Zwillinger 在对 WWD 的评论中提到的单位经济效益(定价完整性)。耐克拥有长达几十年的优势,这种比较并不公平,但这种逆转正是耐克目前重建分销模式的方式。据 NPD 集团称,耐克与阿迪达斯和斯凯奇一样,都是自己最好的零售渠道。

耐克的直接零售战略庞大而细致,将商店概念、游戏、应用程序和 Web 3.0 都考虑在内。耐克计划在每一次互动中都拥有顾客,这对依赖耐克的零售商造成了伤害。鞋业新闻》(Footwear News)援引了耐克总部整合分销的紧迫性

对于耐克来说,积极的 DTC 战略导致该品牌终止了与 Zappos、Dillard's、DSW、Urban Outfitters、Shoe Show 等零售商的批发账户,使许多零售商无法在店内销售最受欢迎的品牌之一。耐克还削减了在现有供应商(如 Foot Locker)的产品数量,以巩固分销。

由于失去了耐克的部分门店,Foot Locker 公司报告的前景黯淡,股价下跌。而其他零售商,如 DSW、Urban Outfitters 和 Shoe Show,在耐克离开的消息传出后也面临着类似的市场压力。在品牌经历自身周期的同时,依靠品牌的商店也在经历自身的复兴。对大多数人来说,这既不是厄运,也不是阴霾。

如果我的假设是正确的,那么最大、最成熟的零售商留下的全渠道空白将由Allbirds和NOBULL这样的新兴现代品牌来填补。5年、10年或20年后,这些现代品牌可能会写下同样的故事,来展望自己的未来--这就是品牌、实体零售商和不断发展的分销战略之间共生关系的新形态。

一方面:盈利的传统企业品牌因放弃批发而转向 DTC 而成为新闻焦点。另一端:尚未盈利的数字原生品牌则因转向百货公司批发以寻求利润和规模而成为新闻焦点。

它们都在努力实现全渠道的涅槃。

作者:Web Smith | 编辑:Hilary Milnes,美术:Christina Williams

备忘录2PM 数字商务演示

虽然 DNVB 的大部分特征构成没有变化,但背景却发生了翻天覆地的变化。新的宏观经济趋势和市场力量正在影响着DTC行业,而DTC行业也在影响着旧世界。2PM 的报道和分析实时密切关注这些趋势;值得回过头来评估一下未来零售、Web3、供应链、隐私、房地产以及元宇宙内部所有权理念的整体前景。

在为德勤数字公司(Deloitte Digital)所做的介绍中,2PM 概述了八个具有前瞻性的想法。

实体到数字:零售商正在撤出第三方零售商[1

对于各种规模和地位的品牌来说,一个主要的战略是有意识地精心创建一个批发网络,以便控制库存和建立合作伙伴关系,而不是像过去几代人那样采用喷洒和喷洒的零售方式。随着品牌专注于自有渠道,第三方零售商所扮演的角色将越来越小,也将与以往不同。这就是一个很好的例子:到 2027 年,耐克的直销比例将达到 70%。

数字到实体:DNVB 正在开放自有购物体验[2]

对于网络品牌来说,扩张正在店铺层面进行。实体店提升了品牌的网络光环,如果做得好,还能赚钱。风险在于避免过度零售。随着这种扩张,商场也将按照 DTC 的形象进行改造。

广告业的变化苹果隐私更新将产生持久影响[3]

第一方数据将决定下一波广告和销售浪潮。品牌和平台现在正努力适应苹果的隐私更新,而谷歌也计划对安卓系统进行类似的改变。苹果将挑战 Meta 和谷歌作为主要广告平台的地位。再加上一键购买,苹果的主导地位不难想象。值得关注的还有gCommerce 的崛起和 QR 码的持续盛行。

CAC 持续上升,内容合作伙伴关系对物业变得更加重要[4]

影响广告策略的变化不止苹果一家。客户获取成本越来越高。除了对第一方数据的重视,内容合作也将成为广告主未来的关键战略。这种合作关系将超越合作关系,品牌将收购媒体属性,以获得对产品需求和社区的洞察。

在美国采用 eCom 之前,近距离支付就已开始增长[5] 。

目前,美国的移动支付采用率在全球排名第八。这将是美国科技界的下一场军备竞赛,各家公司将争相成为最大的移动支付运营商。预测:到 2027 年,美国的电子通信普及率将达到 30%。

空运、集装箱船和自有链[6]

在过去两年里,供应链中断重塑了零售业。最大的零售商将采取行动,确保自己不再受制于无法控制的力量,因为他们有资源拥有自己的供应链。预计亚马逊、塔吉特和沃尔玛将收购更多的供应链促进者。这可能会使小品牌更加听命于大零售商。

商场将促进电子商贸退货,以带动人流[7]

五年后商场的目的是什么?关注零售商最大的痛点:网上退货。美国的购物中心正陷入困境,有了这么多额外的零售空间,更多的购物中心将变成逆向物流中心,以帮助品牌减轻在线退货的成本。

Web3和DTC,区块链上的零售[8]

到 2027 年,零售商在虚拟世界的投入将与在实体世界的投入相当。Web3 可以帮助品牌建立新时代的忠诚度计划和社区,同时创造一个与创造更多实体商品无关的收入来源。请关注耐克和星巴克的发展方向。

就在这里。订阅者可获得 PDF 文件,只需回复订阅者电子邮件,我将亲自发送:

作者:韦伯-史密斯、希拉里-米尔恩斯、克里斯蒂娜-威廉姆斯和亚历克斯-雷米